<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">DOI: 10.18413/2313-8971-2017-3-2-41-45</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1105</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PEDAGOGICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>TEACHERS ON THE NEED OF MODERNIZATION OF CONTENT  OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ON SPECIALTY  “PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER”</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>TEACHERS ON THE NEED OF MODERNIZATION OF CONTENT  OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ON SPECIALTY  “PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER”</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Milenovich</surname><given-names>ZHivorad</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Milenovich</surname><given-names>ZHivorad</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>zivorad.milenovic@pr.ac.rs</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Cvetkovic</surname><given-names>Raisa</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Cvetkovic</surname><given-names>Raisa</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vinica@ptt.rs</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2017/2/Миленович_Цветкович.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The subject of this empirical study is the study of the assessment/ opinion of teachers on the need to modernize the curriculum in the specialty &amp;ldquo;The theory and methodology of primary education&amp;rdquo;. As a starting point, a hypothesis is chosen that indicates the need for more detailed development of problems related to the structure of higher pedagogical education, in particular, with the content of curriculums on the profile of a primary school teacher. Thus, at present, the task of modernizing the structure and content of the curricula of the academic disciplines in terms of the theory and methodology of primary education is topical. We also suggested that in the process of research a statistically significant difference in the teachers&amp;#39; assessments / opinions will be determined about the need to modernize the content of the curriculum work programs according to the profile &amp;ldquo;The theory and methodology of primary education&amp;rdquo;, depending on the level of their professional competence and the central/ peripheral location of the primary school, in which the questioned works as a teacher. To verify the reliability of theoretical hypotheses in December 2016, a sample survey was conducted among 103 respondents &amp;ndash; teachers of primary classes in Nis Region (Republic of Serbia). The data obtained in the course of the study are summarized in the PU-PMSPRN scale (a = 0.762) and statistically processed using the statistical package of the H-Kruskel-Wallis criterion and subsequent comparison with the calculated median. The results of the research showed the existence of a statistically significant difference in the teachers&amp;#39; assessments/ opinions about the need to modernize the content of the curriculum work programs by the profile of the theory and methodology of primary education, depending on the level of their professional competence: c&amp;sup2; (2, n = 103) = 6.140, p = 0.046, and from the central/ peripheral location of the primary school in which the respondent teaches: c&amp;sup2; (1, n = 103) = 0.498, p = 0.480 (Table 4).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The subject of this empirical study is the study of the assessment/ opinion of teachers on the need to modernize the curriculum in the specialty &amp;ldquo;The theory and methodology of primary education&amp;rdquo;. As a starting point, a hypothesis is chosen that indicates the need for more detailed development of problems related to the structure of higher pedagogical education, in particular, with the content of curriculums on the profile of a primary school teacher. Thus, at present, the task of modernizing the structure and content of the curricula of the academic disciplines in terms of the theory and methodology of primary education is topical. We also suggested that in the process of research a statistically significant difference in the teachers&amp;#39; assessments / opinions will be determined about the need to modernize the content of the curriculum work programs according to the profile &amp;ldquo;The theory and methodology of primary education&amp;rdquo;, depending on the level of their professional competence and the central/ peripheral location of the primary school, in which the questioned works as a teacher. To verify the reliability of theoretical hypotheses in December 2016, a sample survey was conducted among 103 respondents &amp;ndash; teachers of primary classes in Nis Region (Republic of Serbia). The data obtained in the course of the study are summarized in the PU-PMSPRN scale (a = 0.762) and statistically processed using the statistical package of the H-Kruskel-Wallis criterion and subsequent comparison with the calculated median. The results of the research showed the existence of a statistically significant difference in the teachers&amp;#39; assessments/ opinions about the need to modernize the content of the curriculum work programs by the profile of the theory and methodology of primary education, depending on the level of their professional competence: c&amp;sup2; (2, n = 103) = 6.140, p = 0.046, and from the central/ peripheral location of the primary school in which the respondent teaches: c&amp;sup2; (1, n = 103) = 0.498, p = 0.480 (Table 4).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Teacher</kwd><kwd>teaching profession</kwd><kwd>class-teaching</kwd><kwd>study programme</kwd><kwd>modernization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Teacher</kwd><kwd>teaching profession</kwd><kwd>class-teaching</kwd><kwd>study programme</kwd><kwd>modernization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Il&amp;#39;in V., Shabunova A., Leonidova G. The Social Position of Schoolteachers in Russia. Russian Education and Society. 2013. 55 (9). Pp. 47-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Edmond N., Hayler M. On Either Side of the Teacher: Perspectives on Professionalism in Education. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy. 2013. 39 (2). Pp. 209-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Karolc&amp;iacute;k S., Cipkov&amp;aacute; E., Kinchin, I. Тeacher Attitudes to Professional Development of Proficiency in the Classroom Application of Digital Technologies. International Education Studies, 2016. 9 (4), Pp. 9-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Kopnina H. Future Scenarios and Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education. 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>45 (4), Pp. 217-231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Milenovic A. Class Teaching in Primary Schools: Innovative Didactic Methodological Models. Belgrade: Andrejevic endowment. 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Radovic S. Teaching Materials &amp;quot;Surface Area of Geometric Figures,&amp;quot; Created Using the Software Package &amp;quot;GeoGebra&amp;quot;. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2013. 4 (2), Pp. 72-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Semenog O. Training of Masters in Philology in Ukraine and Abroad: Search for Educational Strategies. Comparative Professional Pedagogy. 2015. 5 (1). Pp. 25-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Subramonian G., Hallen D. Requirements and Constraints of B.Ed., Trainees in Communicative English. Journal on English Language Teaching, 2012. 2 (1), Pp. 27-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Hamzina G. Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities&amp;#39; Discourse: Employers&amp;#39; Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. 11 (16). Pp. 9101-9112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Chen F. Taboos in China: To Be or Not to Be. English Language Teaching. 2012. 5 (7), Pp. 123-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Yarovaya Y. Standardization of Primary Education in Great Britain. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2015. 12 (2), Pp. 169-174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>