2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2018-4-2-0-71401PSYCHOLOGYTROLLING IN THE INTERNET SPACE AS A RESULT OF DEVIANT INTERNET SOCIALIZATIONTROLLING IN THE INTERNET SPACE AS A RESULT OF DEVIANT INTERNET SOCIALIZATIONLuchinkinaAngelica IlyinichnaLuchinkinaAngelica Ilyinichnaaluch@ya.ruCrimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov20184200

The article describes users with a deviant direction of Internet socialization. The author points to the mythology of their thinking, which is expressed in destructive ideas about the role of the Internet in human life. The article notes that for this group of users, the Internet appears to be in the top three institutions of socialization of the individual, and the first mechanism of socialization in the hierarchy is the mechanism of self-expression. The motives for replication and contribution become the leading motives. The article presents the results of an empirical study of the personality traits of trolls. The purpose of the article is to analyze the social and psychological analysis of trolling as a result of the deviant direction of Internet socialization of the individual in the Internet space. The empirical research revealed the fact that the social experience of the user changes in the course of Internet socialization. One should note that Internet users with a deviant direction of socialization in the Internet space are more often active and overly active with sufficient or high level of instrumental competence. These users are characterized by the idea of the role of the Internet as a space of impunity, chosenness. Based on the results of the study, the leading motives of using the Internet space by the user with a deviant orientation include the motive of personal space, marked presence and replication, a combination of motives for contribution, replication in a deviant form of implementation. Users with a deviant orientation feel important and powerful.

The article describes users with a deviant direction of Internet socialization. The author points to the mythology of their thinking, which is expressed in destructive ideas about the role of the Internet in human life. The article notes that for this group of users, the Internet appears to be in the top three institutions of socialization of the individual, and the first mechanism of socialization in the hierarchy is the mechanism of self-expression. The motives for replication and contribution become the leading motives. The article presents the results of an empirical study of the personality traits of trolls. The purpose of the article is to analyze the social and psychological analysis of trolling as a result of the deviant direction of Internet socialization of the individual in the Internet space. The empirical research revealed the fact that the social experience of the user changes in the course of Internet socialization. One should note that Internet users with a deviant direction of socialization in the Internet space are more often active and overly active with sufficient or high level of instrumental competence. These users are characterized by the idea of the role of the Internet as a space of impunity, chosenness. Based on the results of the study, the leading motives of using the Internet space by the user with a deviant orientation include the motive of personal space, marked presence and replication, a combination of motives for contribution, replication in a deviant form of implementation. Users with a deviant orientation feel important and powerful.

trollingInternet socializationcommunicative commandInternet usersmythologymotivationdeviant directiontrollingInternet socializationcommunicative commandInternet usersmythologymotivationdeviant directionСписок литературыLuchinkina A.I. (2014), “Specificity of motivation of Internet users“, Gumanitarnyye nauki, 105-109.Luchinkina A.I. (2016), “Psychological analysis of deviations in the process of Internet socialization of the individual”, Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 1 (33), 54-62.Luchinkina A.I. (2016), “Specificity of the world view of Internet users”, Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya, 51-1, 311-317.Luchinkina I.S. (2017), “Methodological problems in the study of the communicative behaviour of users in the Internet”, Gumanitarnyye nauki, 4 (40), 42-46.Arestova O., Babanin L., Voiskounsky A. (1999), “Psychological research of computer-mediated communication in Russia”, Behaviour and Information Technology, 18 (2), 141-147.Birnbaum M. (2001), Psychological Experiments on the Internet, Academic Press, N.Y., USA.Donath J. (1999), “Identity and deception in the virtual community”, in Smith M.A. (ed.), Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge, N.Y., 29-59.Donath J. (2014), The Social Machine: Designs for Living Online, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Gackenbach G. (2007), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications, Academic Press, San Diego et al., USA.Griffin P, Belyaeva A.V., Soldatova G. U. (1992), “Socio-historical concepts applied to observations of computer use”, European J. of Psychology of Education, 7, 269-286.Harris R. (2008), A cognitive psychology of mass communication, L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA.Kiesler S. (1996), Social Psychology of the Internet, Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA.Riva G. (2001), Mind, cognition and society in the Internet age, IOS Press, Washington, USA.Siegel J. and Kiesler S. (1986), “Group processes in computer-mediated communication”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.Wallace P. (1999), The Psychology of the Internet, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, UK.