2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2018-4-3-0-51470PEDAGOGICSPROFESSIONAL AND PEDAGOGICAL SELF-REALIZATION OF THE UNIVERSITY TEACHER IN THE SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE OF HIGHER EDUCATIONPROFESSIONAL AND PEDAGOGICAL SELF-REALIZATION OF THE UNIVERSITY TEACHER IN THE SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE OF HIGHER EDUCATIONSitnikovaMaria IvanovnaSitnikovaMaria Ivanovnasitnikova@bsu.edu.ruShrubchenkoAnastasia VasilyevnaShrubchenkoAnastasia Vasilyevnashrubchenko@bsu.edu.ru20184300

The article proves the necessity of raising the level of professional and pedagogical self-realization of the university teacher in the system of quality assurance of higher education as a strategic priority in the activity of the university. It is determined that an urgent task and a guarantee of the quality of educational services provided by an educational institution is the creation of a "portrait" of a quality teacher. The competence approach is used as a methodological basis. Its development in the domestic education testifies that at present, in science, the given problem is effectively developed and is widely considered. The quality of teaching is presented as one of the main values in the modern university and the professionalism of the teacher of higher education. The quality of teaching is also considered as an integral characteristic of the teacher's activity, expressing a measure of the correspondence of the prevalent in society views about what the teaching process should be and what goals it should serve. Professionalism of the teacher of higher education is the ability to perform scientific, methodological, educational, research and educational activities in unity. A short review of the results of a study on the distribution of teachers according to the levels of their professional and pedagogical self-realization in the priority areas of pedagogical activity was made. The authors present the indicators of satisfaction of the bachelors of the higher educational institution with the quality of educational services and provide the indicators of satisfaction of teachers with certain aspects of their professional and pedagogical self-fulfillment. Based on the data obtained, conclusions are drawn that in the system of Russian education there is a tendency to underestimate the quality of teaching, which leads to the need for an expanded use and introduction of a universal concept into pedagogical practice, which means an ongoing process of assessing the quality of teaching.

The article proves the necessity of raising the level of professional and pedagogical self-realization of the university teacher in the system of quality assurance of higher education as a strategic priority in the activity of the university. It is determined that an urgent task and a guarantee of the quality of educational services provided by an educational institution is the creation of a "portrait" of a quality teacher. The competence approach is used as a methodological basis. Its development in the domestic education testifies that at present, in science, the given problem is effectively developed and is widely considered. The quality of teaching is presented as one of the main values in the modern university and the professionalism of the teacher of higher education. The quality of teaching is also considered as an integral characteristic of the teacher's activity, expressing a measure of the correspondence of the prevalent in society views about what the teaching process should be and what goals it should serve. Professionalism of the teacher of higher education is the ability to perform scientific, methodological, educational, research and educational activities in unity. A short review of the results of a study on the distribution of teachers according to the levels of their professional and pedagogical self-realization in the priority areas of pedagogical activity was made. The authors present the indicators of satisfaction of the bachelors of the higher educational institution with the quality of educational services and provide the indicators of satisfaction of teachers with certain aspects of their professional and pedagogical self-fulfillment. Based on the data obtained, conclusions are drawn that in the system of Russian education there is a tendency to underestimate the quality of teaching, which leads to the need for an expanded use and introduction of a universal concept into pedagogical practice, which means an ongoing process of assessing the quality of teaching.

quality assurance system of higher educationcompetence approachquality management of educationquality of teaching in the universityprofessional-pedagogical self-realization of the teacherquality assurance system of higher educationcompetence approachquality management of educationquality of teaching in the universityprofessional-pedagogical self-realization of the teacherСписок литературыAndreev, A.L. (2005) “Competence paradigm in education: the experience of philosophical and methodological analysis”, Pedagogy, 4, 19-26.Baidenko, V.I. (2004) “Competences in vocational education (To master the competence approach)”, Higher Education in Russia, 11, 4-12.Zimniaia, I.A. (2006) “Competence approach. What is its place in the system of modern approaches to the problems of education?”, Higher education today, 8, 23.Zimnyaya, I.A. (2005) “General culture and social and professional competence of a person”, Higher Education Today, 11, 14-20.Meshkova, Т.А. (2010) “The quality of teaching as an integral part of the culture of quality in the university”, Issues of Education, 3,115-134.Mityaeva, A.M. (2007), Competence model of multi-level higher education (on the material of the formation of educational and research competence of bachelors and masters), Author's abstract of PhD dissertation, Volgograd, Russia.On the approval of the state program of the Russian Federation “Development of Education”: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1642 of December 26“The main provisions of the Report of the International Commission on Education for the 21st Century” (2007), available at: http://www.ifap.ru/library/book201.pdf. (Accessed 25 July 2018).Plaksiy, S. (2005) “Paradoxes of reforming Russian higher education”, Alma mater, 10, 3-11.Filippov, V.M. (ed.) (2003), Reform of Education: Analytical Review, Center for Comparative Educational Policy, Moscow, 303.Sitnikova, M.I. (2012), “The model of ensuring the quality assurance system of teaching at the University on the basis of the competence-based approach: development, testing, correction”, Modern problems of science and education, № 5, available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7283 (Accessed 26 July 2018).Skok, G.B. (2003), “Some norms of the quality of the teacher's activity”, University management: practice and analysis, 3 (26), 84-90.Tatur, Yu.G. (2004), “Competence in the structure of the model of the quality of specialist training”, Higher education today, 3, 20-26.Shadrikov, V.D. (2004), “New model of specialist: innovative training and competence approach”, Higher education today, 8, 26-31.Belisle, С. and Linard, M. (1996), “Quellesnouvelles competences des acteurs de la formation dans le contexte des technologies de l’information et de la communication”, Education permanente, 127.Frenz, M. and Birmes, M. (2008), “Assessment of working and social behaviour in North Rhine-Westphalia in the Form of six “top notes”, The vocational school: Ztschr. invites. Association of commercial teachers Association, Jg. 60, H. 4, 115–120.Kirschner, P., Vilsteren, P.V., Hummel, and H., Wigman, M. (1997) “The Desighn of a Study Environment for Acquiring Academic and Professional Competence”, Studies in Higher Education, № 22 (2), 151–171.Robinson, Bernadette. (1995). “The Management of Quality in Open and Distance Learning” In Indira Gandhi National Open University, Structure and Management of Open Learning Systems. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, New Delhi, 20-22February 1995, Vol. 1, 95-109Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (2005), European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), Helsinki.