2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2018-4-4-0-21527PEDAGOGICSThe active didactic platform of the evolution of the flagship universityThe active didactic platform of the evolution of the flagship universityMelnikNadezhda MikhailovnaMelnikNadezhda Mikhailovnaprfgo@rambler.ruSamara State Technical University20184400

The article explores the mission and objective possibilities of the flagship university, as well as the conditions under which it really becomes a driving factor of the innovative economic, social, cultural development of the region through its contribution to the creation of high-tech industries, the implementation of cultural initiatives, ensuring the flow tax revenues to the regional budget and to training of high-potential professionals. As a result of studying domestic and foreign scientific, pedagogical, special literature, and practical pedagogical experience, the author makes a conclusion about the need of a qualitative change in the content of a university education by moving from the knowledge model of didactic platform to the active model of a didactic platform that ensures proportionality of education of a specialist to the changing needs of society, the economy, the individual. Special attention is paid to a unique character of the proposed active model of the didactic platform: ensuring the possibility of parametric control of creating new connections between the subject's impact on the object of activity and their reflection in the form of changing the parameters of the object, which ensures the aggregation of new knowledge of the current level of complexity at the right time and in any sphere of economy. The author proves that the active model of the didactic platform creates conditions for the development and implementation of solutions of a qualitatively new level (new properties, new functions), with fundamentally new opportunities based on a systemic representation of changes in the state and properties of an activity object in the process of directed activity of a subject. Such an approach realizes the conversion of a trainee from a passive acquirer and replicator of knowledge to the specialist, who can create a qualitatively new product with innovative value due to the holistic view of productive activity and the conscious choice of the direction of its activity in almost any field of activity.

The article explores the mission and objective possibilities of the flagship university, as well as the conditions under which it really becomes a driving factor of the innovative economic, social, cultural development of the region through its contribution to the creation of high-tech industries, the implementation of cultural initiatives, ensuring the flow tax revenues to the regional budget and to training of high-potential professionals. As a result of studying domestic and foreign scientific, pedagogical, special literature, and practical pedagogical experience, the author makes a conclusion about the need of a qualitative change in the content of a university education by moving from the knowledge model of didactic platform to the active model of a didactic platform that ensures proportionality of education of a specialist to the changing needs of society, the economy, the individual. Special attention is paid to a unique character of the proposed active model of the didactic platform: ensuring the possibility of parametric control of creating new connections between the subject's impact on the object of activity and their reflection in the form of changing the parameters of the object, which ensures the aggregation of new knowledge of the current level of complexity at the right time and in any sphere of economy. The author proves that the active model of the didactic platform creates conditions for the development and implementation of solutions of a qualitatively new level (new properties, new functions), with fundamentally new opportunities based on a systemic representation of changes in the state and properties of an activity object in the process of directed activity of a subject. Such an approach realizes the conversion of a trainee from a passive acquirer and replicator of knowledge to the specialist, who can create a qualitatively new product with innovative value due to the holistic view of productive activity and the conscious choice of the direction of its activity in almost any field of activity.

the core universitythe active model of the didactic platformparametric controlconsciously directed activitythe core universitythe active model of the didactic platformparametric controlconsciously directed activityСписок литературыAnisimov, YU.P. and Sviridova S.V. (2015), “Future-oriented areas of strategic development of innovation-active enterprises”, Herald of Voronezh State University. Economics and Management, 2, 92-98.Berulava, G.A. and Berulava, M.N. (2012), “The innovative methodological platform for higher education”, Herald of the University of the Russian Academy of Education, 4 (62), 8-37.Bezuevskaya, V.A. and Pelikhov, N.V. (2018), “Supporting University in Ugra: Myth or Reality?”, Creative economy, 12 (7), 1027-1038.Vasil’ev, V.A. (2011), “The abandonment of the fundamental nature of education makes “competence” a deliberate fiction”, Troitsky option, 85, 6-7.Verbitskiy, A.A. (2017), “New facets of the eternal problem. On education in and out of context”, Higher education today, 8, 6-13.Gavrikov, A.L. and Pevzner, M. N. (2018), “Russian universities on the path to institutional diversity: a strategy for the development of a regional flagship university”, Problems of modern education, 4, 84-101.Dyachenko, YU. “Functions of education and their role in modern society”, available at: http://www.km.ru/referats/5ec03d057cd24af18a0177acd727b023 (Accessed 20 September 2018).Kuz’minov, YA.I. and Peskov, D.N. (2017), “What future awaits universities?”, Issues of Education, 3, 202-233.Mel'nik, N.M. (2012), “The Methodology of a graduate student’s professional training for the activity in the conditions of innovative development of economy”, Herald of Samara State Technical University. Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 2 (18), 126-137.Mel'nik, N.M. (2017), “Evolution-activity theory of education – the basis of systemic consolidation of innovation activity of the university, enterprises, business”, Opinion of science, 12, 62-67.Mel'nik, N.M. (2013), “The Innovative Technology of the World Competition Leaders’ Training”, Herald of Samara State Technical University. Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 2 (20), 129-141.“The science. Technology. Person. Materials of the round table (2015), Philosophy of science and technology, 20 (2), 5-50.Nesterenko, V.M. (2011), “Parametric knowledge management in the process of solving professional problems”, Herald of Samara State Technical University. Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 1 (15), 89-99.Nesterenko, V.M. (2015), “Conceptual provisions of the system generation of solving urgent professional problems”, Herald of Samara State Technical University. Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 3, (27), 161-169.Pavlova, O.V. (2013), “Competence approach as the basis for the modernization of the modern system of higher professional education”, News of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 2, 72-75.Popov, A.A. and Ermakov, S.V. “The cultural-historical theory of L.S. Vygotsky and the third generation of anthropo-pratik development”, available at: http://opencu.ru/page/vigodskiyitri (Accessed 15 September 2018).Sklyarova, E.E. (2012), “The Conceptual model of innovative economy”, Socio-economic phenomena and processes, 9, 155-164.Pelikhov, N.V., Karataeva, G.E., Groshev, A.R., Bezuenskaya, V.A., Karataev, A.S. and Kosenok, S.M. (2017), “University in the region: what it is and what it should be”, University management: practice and analysis, 24 (4), 116-129.Chirkov, V.A., Andreev, V.V. and Tarasova, N.P. (2013), “Humanitarization of education and a system-based approach”, Modern problems of science and education, 6, available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=11591 (Accessed 03 October 2018).Chhedrovitskiy, G.P. (2005), [], Vostochnaya literatura , Moscow, Russia.Boucher, G., Conway, C. and Van der Meer, E. (2003), “Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region's Development”, Regional Studies, 37 (9), 887-897.Breznitz, S. and Feldman, M. (2012), “The engaged university”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (2), 139-157.Carayannis, E. and Grigoroudis, E. (2016), “Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness”, Foresight and STI Governance, 10 (1), 31-42.Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators (2017), available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en (Accessed 3 October 2018).Johnston, A., Huggins, R. and Stride, C. (2012), “The Knowledge Networks of Higher Education Institutions: An Analysis By Type and Location”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24, 475-502.Kergroach, S. (2017), “Industry 4.0: New Challenges and Opportunities for the Labour Market”, Foresight and STI Governance, 11 (4), 6-8.Lawton-Smith, H. (2007), “Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence”, Environment and Planning. Government and Policy, 25 (1), 98-114.Nesterenko, V.M. (2018), Conceptual principles of engineering education based on the approach to evolutionary activity, in Handbook on research in the field of engineering education in a global context (pp. 463-476), IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.Popov, E., Vlasov, M. and Horst, H. (2016), “Resource Potential of Knowledge Generation”, Montenegrin journal of economics, 12, 101-114.Preda, V. (2001), Printsipy didaktiki - v videnii psikhologii obrazovaniya i razvitiyaThe principles of didactics - in the vision of psychology of education and development], in Radu, I. and Ionescu, M. (eds.), Dachiya, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.Russell, B. (2003), The aims of education, Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK.Schaeffer, P., Fischer, B. and Queiroz, S. (2018), “Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems”, Foresight and STI Governance, 12 (2), 50-61.Uyarra, E. (2010), “Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities: Implications and Contradictions”, European Planning Studies, 18, 1227-1246.