2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2019-5-1-0-61631PSYCHOLOGYPeculiarities of psychological well-being of the individual heads of structural divisions of the universityPeculiarities of psychological well-being of the individual heads of structural divisions of the universityVelikanovaAlexandra SergeevnaVelikanovaAlexandra Sergeevnaagerasimova66@mail.ruOboznovAlexander AlexandrovicOboznovAlexander Alexandrovicaao46@mail.ruBelgorod State National Research University20195100

Creating a holistic understanding of the features of the psychological well-being of managers at different levels in organizations, including managers in educational institutions, is an urgent task. The purpose of the research is to study the role of the relationship of heads of structural units of the University to their positions and themselves as leaders, as well as their dominant professional motives for achieving psychological well-being. The study was conducted at Belgorod State National Research University and Belgorod Law Institute named after I.D. Putilin. It involved heads of departments of universities: deans, deputy deans in different areas and heads of departments. A total of 133 respondents participated in the study: 59 men and 74 women aged 21 to 70 years. The study used the following methods:"Methods of assessing professional well-being" (E.I. Ruth 2016), the questionnaire "Professional self-attitude" (K.V. Karpinsky, A. M.Kolyshko, 2010), the questionnaire "Metaphors of professional activity" (K.V. Karpinsky, T.V.Gijak, 2016), “The questionnaire ofbusiness orientation of the individual" (V.I. Taranenko, 2013). Main results: positive connections between the general indicator of psychological well-being of managers and their attitudes to their activities and themselves as leadershave been found. Based on the results of the regression analysis, the authorsstate that the overall indicator of the positivity of professional self-attitude, the indicators of self-blame in the profession, orientation towards the collective, and enthusiasm for the profession are predictors of the general indicator of psychological well-being.

Creating a holistic understanding of the features of the psychological well-being of managers at different levels in organizations, including managers in educational institutions, is an urgent task. The purpose of the research is to study the role of the relationship of heads of structural units of the University to their positions and themselves as leaders, as well as their dominant professional motives for achieving psychological well-being. The study was conducted at Belgorod State National Research University and Belgorod Law Institute named after I.D. Putilin. It involved heads of departments of universities: deans, deputy deans in different areas and heads of departments. A total of 133 respondents participated in the study: 59 men and 74 women aged 21 to 70 years. The study used the following methods:"Methods of assessing professional well-being" (E.I. Ruth 2016), the questionnaire "Professional self-attitude" (K.V. Karpinsky, A. M.Kolyshko, 2010), the questionnaire "Metaphors of professional activity" (K.V. Karpinsky, T.V.Gijak, 2016), “The questionnaire ofbusiness orientation of the individual" (V.I. Taranenko, 2013). Main results: positive connections between the general indicator of psychological well-being of managers and their attitudes to their activities and themselves as leadershave been found. Based on the results of the regression analysis, the authorsstate that the overall indicator of the positivity of professional self-attitude, the indicators of self-blame in the profession, orientation towards the collective, and enthusiasm for the profession are predictors of the general indicator of psychological well-being.

psychological well-being of the managerattitude to the professionprofessional self-attitudebusiness orientationpsychological well-being of the managerattitude to the professionprofessional self-attitudebusiness orientationСписок литературыAbrosimov, A.E., Buchek, A.A. and Frizen, M.A. (2015), “Personal potential of managers in educational institutions (on the example of autonomy and self-efficacy)”, Vestnik KRAUNC. Humanitarian sciences, 2 (26), 26-33. (In Russian).Berezovskaya, R.A. (2016) “Professional well-being: problems and prospects of psychological research”, Psychological studies, 9 (45), Art. 2. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed 23 December 2018). (In Russian).Bessonova, Yu.V. (2013), On the structure of psychological well-being [Psychological well-being of the individual in the modern educational space: Coll. of articles], 30-35, Yekaterinburg, RussiaBorisova, N.S. (2018), “Subjective well-being of higher school teachers”, Economy and society: development prospects, Collection of materials of the II All-Russian Scientific Practical Conference, ed. by T.S. Bobkova, Kirov,Russia, 142-146. (In Russian).Borodkina, E.V. (2012), “To the question of the study of subjective well-being in the professional-pedagogical activity”, Psychology and Pedagogy: methods and problems of practical application, 28, 31-34. (In Russian).Gaidamashko, I.V. (2013) “Psychological aspects of resolving intrapersonal conflicts of managers of educational organizations”, International Scientific Practical Journal Modern Psychology, 2, 3-5. (In Russian).Gizhuk, T.V. (2016), The personal meaning of professional activity as a factor in the formation of a subjective picture of a teacher’s career [Current problems of the personality psychology: a collection of scientific articles], Grodno, Belorussia, 162-182. (In Belorussian).Guseva, N.V. (2013), “Focus on the task and on interaction as important components of the effective activity of the head of the pedagogical team”, Current issues of modern psychology: materials of the II Intern. scientific conf., 18-21. Chelyabinsk, Russia. (In Russian).Endovitskii, D.A. (2017), “The influence of the personality of the university leader on the effectiveness of the university”, Higher education in Russia, 11, 79-88. (In Russian).Zausenko, I.V. (2012), Personality determinants of psychological well-being of the teacher, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Ural. State. ped. Univ., Ekaterinburg Russia. (In Russian).Karpinskiy, K.V. (2010), Professional self-attitude of a person and the method of his/ her psychological diagnosis, Grodno State University, Grodno, Belorussia. (In Belorussian).Karpinskiy, K.V., Gizhuk, T.V. (2015), “Metaphors of professional activity: a new method for diagnosing the personal meaning of a profession. Communication 2: Essence and Approbation of the Method”, Psychological Diagnostics, 2, 25-40. (In Russian).Luk'yanchenko, N.V. (2016), “The relationship of professionally significant personal qualities and working motivation of managers with their psychological well-being”, Siberian Psychological Journal, 62, 153-168. (In Russian).Minyurova, S.A., Zausenko, I.V. (2013) “Personal determinants of psychological well-being of the teacher”, Pedagogical education in Russia, 1, 94- 101. (In Russian).Psychological well-being of the individual in the modern educational space: Coll. of articles (2013), comp. byYu.V. Bratchikov, Ural. StatePed. Univ., Yekaterinburg, Russia. (In Russian).Rut, E.I. (2016) Professional well-being of employees of commercial organizations: criteria and methods of assessment: dis. ... master, St. Petersburg State. Univ., St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).Seligman, M.V. (2012), The path to prosperity. New understanding of happiness and well-being, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Sozontov, A.E. (2006), “Hedonistic and eudaemonisticapproaches to the problem of psychological well-being”, Questions of psychology, 4, 105-114. (In Russian).Taranenko, V.I. (2013), Human resource management, corporate monitoring, psychodiagnostics. Tests for personnel selection, Avalon-Alpha, Kiev, Ukraine. (In Ukraine).Shevelenkova, T.D., Fesenko, P.P. (2005), “Psychological well-being of the individual (review of the basic concepts and research methods)”, Psychological diagnosis, 3, 95-129. (In Russian).Bradburn, N. (1969), “The Structure of Psychological well-being” / N. Bradburn. Chicago: Aldene Pab, 269. (In USA)Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., Scheier, M. F. (1996), “A control-process perspective on the origins of affect”, In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.). Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and regulation (pp. 11–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Deci, E.L. (1980), “Intrinsic motivation”, New York: Plenum Publishing Co. Japaneso Edition, Tokyo: Seishin Shubo. (In Japan).Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (1985), “Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior— NY: Plenum Publishing Co, 45.Diener, E., Suh, E. (2013), “Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators”, Social Indicators Research, 40, (1-2), 189-216.Diener, Ed., Lucas, R.E. (2000), “Subjective well-being”. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index”, American psychologist, 55 (1), 34-43.Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions / M.E.P. Seligman, R.M., Ernst, J., Gillham et al. (2009), Oxford Review of Education, 35, 293-311.Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions / M.E.P. Seligman, T.A., Steen, N., Park, C., Peterson (2005), American Psychologist, 60 (5), 410-421.Ruch, W. (2010),“Values in action inventory of strengths” (VIA-IS) adaptation and validation of the german version and the development of a peer-rating form / W. Ruch, R.T. Proyer, C. Harzer et al, Journal of Individual Differences, 31 (3), 138-149.Ryff, C.D. (1995), “Psychological well-being in adult life”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104.Ryff, C.D., Keyes, C. L. (1995)“The structure of psychological well-being revisited”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.Ryff, C.D. (1998), “The contours of positive human health”, Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1-28.Warr, P. (1990), “The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.