<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2020-6-1-0-7</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1976</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of formation thinking in the digital environment &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(comparative analysis of generations)&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of formation thinking in the digital environment &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(comparative analysis of generations)&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Dutko</surname><given-names>Julia Alexandrovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dutko</surname><given-names>Julia Alexandrovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>yulya.dutko@bk.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Belovol</surname><given-names>Elena Vladimirovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Belovol</surname><given-names>Elena Vladimirovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ev.belovol@mpgu.su</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2020/1/Дутко_Беловол_d6DvKG1.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>In the 21st century, it is impossible to imagine human life without the use of digital technologies. Digital technologies as the most important means of human activity directly affect both the person as a whole and the structure of cognitive processes, in particular. In the modern world, a significant part of the research is devoted to the study of cognitive processes, as well as to the study of the &amp;ldquo;generation Z&amp;rdquo; phenomenon, however, the sociocultural aspect of the formation of the cognitive sphere among representatives of different cultural periods remains a poorly studied and debatable problem, which determines the relevance of this study. The purpose of the study is a theoretical analysis and an empirical study of the characteristics of the formation of personality thinking in a digital environment. The article provides a theoretical overview of the studies devoted to the study of thinking, and discusses the results of an empirical study of the processes of thinking between the representatives of the two cultural periods, which was conducted on the basis of GBOU School №2044. The study involved 80 students. The study is based on the following methods: a methodology for studying the visual-figurative thinking of the &amp;ldquo;Matrix&amp;rdquo; by J. Raven, a methodology for studying verbal and logical thinking &amp;ldquo;The identification of essential features&amp;rdquo; by S.Ya. Rubinstein, subtests of the methodology of D. Wexler, aimed at the study of thinking processes. Comparative data of the diagnostics carried out confirm that the features of the formation of thinking in the digital environment are manifested in the lack of verbal-logical thinking, low ability to generalize the material, synthesis and analysis operations, and visual-figurative thinking is the leading one. The results emphasize that the globalization of digital technology has had a serious impact on the formation of the mental processes of the individual. The scientific significance of the results is to identify the specifics of thinking processes in adolescents of the digital generation, taking into account which it is necessary to make changes in the methods of training and education. The results can be applied in the educational field; in psychological support and correction of cognitive development of personality; when developing training programs by taking into account the data obtained on subjectively significant features of the development of thinking in adolescents of generation Z.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the 21st century, it is impossible to imagine human life without the use of digital technologies. Digital technologies as the most important means of human activity directly affect both the person as a whole and the structure of cognitive processes, in particular. In the modern world, a significant part of the research is devoted to the study of cognitive processes, as well as to the study of the &amp;ldquo;generation Z&amp;rdquo; phenomenon, however, the sociocultural aspect of the formation of the cognitive sphere among representatives of different cultural periods remains a poorly studied and debatable problem, which determines the relevance of this study. The purpose of the study is a theoretical analysis and an empirical study of the characteristics of the formation of personality thinking in a digital environment. The article provides a theoretical overview of the studies devoted to the study of thinking, and discusses the results of an empirical study of the processes of thinking between the representatives of the two cultural periods, which was conducted on the basis of GBOU School №2044. The study involved 80 students. The study is based on the following methods: a methodology for studying the visual-figurative thinking of the &amp;ldquo;Matrix&amp;rdquo; by J. Raven, a methodology for studying verbal and logical thinking &amp;ldquo;The identification of essential features&amp;rdquo; by S.Ya. Rubinstein, subtests of the methodology of D. Wexler, aimed at the study of thinking processes. Comparative data of the diagnostics carried out confirm that the features of the formation of thinking in the digital environment are manifested in the lack of verbal-logical thinking, low ability to generalize the material, synthesis and analysis operations, and visual-figurative thinking is the leading one. The results emphasize that the globalization of digital technology has had a serious impact on the formation of the mental processes of the individual. The scientific significance of the results is to identify the specifics of thinking processes in adolescents of the digital generation, taking into account which it is necessary to make changes in the methods of training and education. The results can be applied in the educational field; in psychological support and correction of cognitive development of personality; when developing training programs by taking into account the data obtained on subjectively significant features of the development of thinking in adolescents of generation Z.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>clip thinking</kwd><kwd>cognitive processes</kwd><kwd>digital environment</kwd><kwd>generation Z</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>clip thinking</kwd><kwd>cognitive processes</kwd><kwd>digital environment</kwd><kwd>generation Z</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Avdulova, T.P. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Teenagers in the information space&amp;rdquo;, Psychology of learning, 12, 4-16. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Azarenok, N.V. (2009), Klipovoye soznaniye i yego vliyaniye na psikhologiyu cheloveka v sovremennom mire [Clip consciousness and its influence on human psychology in the modern world], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Asmolov, A. Semenov, A. and Uvarov, A. (2010) &amp;ldquo;We are waiting for changes&amp;rdquo;, Children in the information society, 5, 20-21. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bukatov, V.M. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Clip changes in the perception, understanding and thinking of modern schoolchildren &amp;ndash; an annoying new formation of the &amp;quot;post-industrial way&amp;quot; or a long-awaited resuscitation of the mental nature?&amp;rdquo;, Actual problems of psychological knowledge, 4 (49), 73-80. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Vygotsky, L.S. (2005), Psikhologiya razvitiyacheloveka [Psychology of human development], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Girenok, F.I. (2016), Klipovoye soznaniye: klipy v nauke, klipy v filosofii, klipy v politike, klipy v iskusstve, klipy v obrazovanii, neklipovoye [Clip consciousness: clips in science, clips in philosophy, clips in politics, clips in art, clips in education, non-clip], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Dubrovina, I.V. (2002), Vozrastnaya i pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Age and pedagogical psychology], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Palladino, L. (2014), Maksimal&amp;#39;naya kontsentratsiya. Kak sokhranit&amp;#39; effektivnost&amp;#39; v epokhu klipovogo myshleniya [The Maximum concentration. How to maintain efficiency in the era of clip thinking], Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Polishchuk, K.A. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Video Clip culture&amp;rdquo; in the modern consumption of information&amp;rdquo;, Proceedings of the Gomel state University, 1 (88), 189-192. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Rubinstein, S.L. (2005), Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General psychology], St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Sapa, A.V. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Generation Z-generation of the era of the GEF&amp;rdquo;, Productive pedagogy,&amp;nbsp;8 (56), 2-9. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Soldatova, G., Rasskazova, E., Lebesheva, M. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Cruel experience&amp;rdquo;, Children in the information society, 12, 26-35. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Spirkina, T.S. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Study of the dynamics of Internet addiction&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of Tomsk state University, 3,159-161. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Shalagina, E.V. (2014), &amp;ldquo;On the question of a new cognitive reality&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of social and humanitarian education and science, 2, 37-41. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Bennett, S., Maton, K. (2010), Beyond the &amp;quot;digital natives&amp;quot; debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students&amp;#39; technology experiences, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26,&amp;nbsp;321-331.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., Healing, G. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?&amp;rdquo;, Computers and Education, 54 (3), 57-64.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>