<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2020-6-2-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2043</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PEDAGOGICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Criteria assessment of teaching staff performance&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Criteria assessment of teaching staff performance&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Gordienko</surname><given-names>Tatyana Petrovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gordienko</surname><given-names>Tatyana Petrovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>tatgordienko@gmail.com</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bezusova</surname><given-names>Tatyana Alekseevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bezusova</surname><given-names>Tatyana Alekseevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>tabezusova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Perm State University.</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2020/2/Гордиенко_Т.П._Безусова_Т.А._hAqNSOQ.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article is devoted to the problem of assessing the activities of scientific and pedagogical workers in higher education and professional qualities of teachers. The scientific literature is analyzed from the perspective of studying the criteria-based assessment issues in the education system. In a broad sense, criterion assessment refers to the technology for determining the professional achievements of scientific and pedagogical workers by comparing them with the signs by which the quality of the teacher&amp;rsquo;s activities is evaluated. To characterize the features of the criteria-based assessment of teachers&amp;rsquo; performance in higher education organizations. The authors study and theoretically substantiate the need for assessment activities of teachers; reveal the principles and forms of criteria-based assessment (rating technology, a model for applying effective contracts); provide recommendations on the selection of indicators in the criteria-based assessment of educators. Materials and methods: theoretical (analysis of scientific and methodological literature, study of the experience of higher educational institutions), empirical (observation). The criterion basis for assessing the professional achievements of a teacher in higher education is recorded in the professional standard &amp;ldquo;Teacher of vocational training, vocational education and additional professional education&amp;rdquo;. The main principles of the criteria-based assessment of scientific and pedagogical workers are: the principle of descriptiveness (compliance with the current stage of development of the education system), the principle of interconnection and mutual influence of various types of activity, the principle of comparison and juxtaposition of the activities of teachers. The functions of criteria-based assessment include: diagnostic, controlling, motivational. The article provides examples of indicators of criteria-based assessment of the scientific work of university teachers. The results of the functioning of the system of effective contracts are presented on the example of the structural unit of the university. To determine the quality of the teacher&amp;rsquo;s activities, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate all types of work carried out by him: research work, academic work, educational work, organizational and methodological, professional competencies. The indicators of such an assessment must be divided into mandatory (the basis for concluding a new labor contract), optional (basis for material incentives).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the problem of assessing the activities of scientific and pedagogical workers in higher education and professional qualities of teachers. The scientific literature is analyzed from the perspective of studying the criteria-based assessment issues in the education system. In a broad sense, criterion assessment refers to the technology for determining the professional achievements of scientific and pedagogical workers by comparing them with the signs by which the quality of the teacher&amp;rsquo;s activities is evaluated. To characterize the features of the criteria-based assessment of teachers&amp;rsquo; performance in higher education organizations. The authors study and theoretically substantiate the need for assessment activities of teachers; reveal the principles and forms of criteria-based assessment (rating technology, a model for applying effective contracts); provide recommendations on the selection of indicators in the criteria-based assessment of educators. Materials and methods: theoretical (analysis of scientific and methodological literature, study of the experience of higher educational institutions), empirical (observation). The criterion basis for assessing the professional achievements of a teacher in higher education is recorded in the professional standard &amp;ldquo;Teacher of vocational training, vocational education and additional professional education&amp;rdquo;. The main principles of the criteria-based assessment of scientific and pedagogical workers are: the principle of descriptiveness (compliance with the current stage of development of the education system), the principle of interconnection and mutual influence of various types of activity, the principle of comparison and juxtaposition of the activities of teachers. The functions of criteria-based assessment include: diagnostic, controlling, motivational. The article provides examples of indicators of criteria-based assessment of the scientific work of university teachers. The results of the functioning of the system of effective contracts are presented on the example of the structural unit of the university. To determine the quality of the teacher&amp;rsquo;s activities, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate all types of work carried out by him: research work, academic work, educational work, organizational and methodological, professional competencies. The indicators of such an assessment must be divided into mandatory (the basis for concluding a new labor contract), optional (basis for material incentives).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>criteria-based assessment</kwd><kwd>teacher assessment</kwd><kwd>effective contract</kwd><kwd>rating system of assessment</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>criteria-based assessment</kwd><kwd>teacher assessment</kwd><kwd>effective contract</kwd><kwd>rating system of assessment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Aleksandrova, N.M. (2012), &amp;ldquo;The structure of the teacher&amp;rsquo;s professional activity and the basis for its assessment&amp;rdquo;, Chelovek i obrazovanie, 3 (32), 41-45. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Anohina, S.Ju. (2005), Organizational and pedagogical system for assessing the pedagogical activity of university teachers, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Novgorod, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Belova S.N. (2017), Theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of teachers&amp;#39; competence in the field of intra-university assessment of the quality of the educational process,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Zubkova, E.M. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Criteria-based assessment technology as a means of forming and evaluating the planned results of the Federal State Educational Standard&amp;rdquo;, Professional&amp;#39;noe razvitie pedagogicheskih i upravlencheskih kadrov v Moskovskom megapolise, Moscow, (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Isaeva, T.E. and Timoshek, I.N. (2003), Kompleksnaja otsenka dejatel&amp;#39;nosti prepodavatelja vysshej shkoly [A comprehensive assessment of the activities of a teacher of higher education], Rostov-on-Don, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Karazeeva, Zh.V. (2010), Assessment of the professionalism of university teachers engaged in advanced training of civil servants, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Krasnoborova, A.A. (2010), Criterion assessment as a technology for the formation of educational and cognitive competence of students, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Perm, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kriventsova, E.J. and Gunina, N.A. (2016), &amp;ldquo;The system of criteria-based assessment as an instrument for measuring the quality of education: current and final assessment&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy sovremennoj nauki i praktiki. Universitetim. V.I. Vernadskogo, 1 (59), 159-164. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Matvievskaja, E.G. (2009), The formation of the culture of evaluative activities of the teacher in the continuing education system: theory, methodology, practice, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Orenburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Romanov Е.V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Efficiency assessment of higher education institutions&amp;rdquo; Contradictions and paradoxes. Part II. The Education and science journal. 21(10): 32-52. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-10-32-52. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Canadas, Laura; Luisa Santos-Pastor, Maria; Javier Castejon, Francisco. Physical Education Teachers&amp;#39; Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice // Apunts Educacion Fisica y Deportes, 1 (139), 33-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Isik, A. Do &amp;ldquo;Students Feel that they are Assessed Properly?&amp;rdquo; Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8 (1), 63-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Lopez-de-Arana Prado, Elena; Aramburuzabala Higuera, Pilar; Opazo Carvajal, Hector. &amp;ldquo;Design and validation of a questionnaire for self-assessment of university service-learning experiences&amp;rdquo; Educacion XX1, 23 (1), 319-347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Patterson, Cody L.; Parrott, Amy; Belnap, Jason. &amp;ldquo;Strategies for Assessing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching in Mathematics Content Courses&amp;rdquo; Mathematics Enthusiast, 17&amp;nbsp;(2-3), 807-842.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>