2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2020-6-3-0-1.2122PEDAGOGICSStatus, motivation and satisfaction of a higher education teacher: reflections on the research resultsStatus, motivation and satisfaction of a higher education teacher: reflections on the research resultsSlinkovAnatoly MikhailovichSlinkovAnatoly Mikhailovichst121175@mail.ruSlinkovaOlga KonstantinovnaSlinkovaOlga Konstantinovnaslinkova@bsu.edu.ruKlimovaTatiana BronislavovnaKlimovaTatiana Bronislavovnatklimova@bsu.edu.ruBelgorod State National Research UniversityBelgorod Institute of Education Development20206300

The article presents the results of a study conducted under the auspices of the League of Higher Education Teachers in March - April 2020. The study was aimed at identifying the social status and role of teachers of domestic higher education in the development of civil society and it covered 45 regions of Russia. The article discusses the relationship of motivation, satisfaction and social significance of the work of university teachers. The authors analyze those aspects of work motivation and job satisfaction of university teachers that directly affect the level of prestige of this profession. The study showed that such factors as “administration's attitude to employees' needs” and “career growth” have the most negative impact on job satisfaction and, accordingly, awareness of teachers' own worth. A negative trend was observed in changes in the respondents' job satisfaction over the past year. We have made a conclusion that the real status, motivation and satisfaction of higher education teachers remain at a level clearly insufficient to solve the complex problems and challenges which modern Russian society is facing. To overcome the identified problems, it is proposed to conduct regular monitoring of job satisfaction at universities and to develop a corporate culture, which is based on the recognition of the value of labor of a higher education teacher.

The article presents the results of a study conducted under the auspices of the League of Higher Education Teachers in March - April 2020. The study was aimed at identifying the social status and role of teachers of domestic higher education in the development of civil society and it covered 45 regions of Russia. The article discusses the relationship of motivation, satisfaction and social significance of the work of university teachers. The authors analyze those aspects of work motivation and job satisfaction of university teachers that directly affect the level of prestige of this profession. The study showed that such factors as “administration's attitude to employees' needs” and “career growth” have the most negative impact on job satisfaction and, accordingly, awareness of teachers' own worth. A negative trend was observed in changes in the respondents' job satisfaction over the past year. We have made a conclusion that the real status, motivation and satisfaction of higher education teachers remain at a level clearly insufficient to solve the complex problems and challenges which modern Russian society is facing. To overcome the identified problems, it is proposed to conduct regular monitoring of job satisfaction at universities and to develop a corporate culture, which is based on the recognition of the value of labor of a higher education teacher.

statusmotivationjob satisfactionhigher education teachermonitoringcorporate culturestatusmotivationjob satisfactionhigher education teachermonitoringcorporate cultureСписок литературыAhmetshina, E.R. (2009), “Professional identity of a university teacher in the context of reforming the higher education system in Russia”, University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences, 4 (12), 80-87. (In Russian).Grudistova, E.G. (2009), Development of research methods of organizational culture and their use in personnel management, Abstract of dissertation for the degree of Candidate Of Economic Sciences, Baikal State University, Russia.Gucu, E.G., Nyagolova, M.D. and Runova, T.A. (2018), “Investigation of labor activity motivation of the higher education, Vestnik of Minin University, 3(24), available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-motivatsii-trudovoy-deyatelnosti-prepodavatelya-vuza/viewer (Accessed 08 June 2020).Dadaeva, T.M. and Fadeeva, I.M. (2014), “Reform of the higher school: paradoxes and institutional changes stubs”, University Management: Practice and Analysis, 4-5 (92-93), 28-35. (In Russian).Krasinskaya, L.F. (2008), “Professional motivation of a lecturer as a factor influencing on the innovation reformations at higher school”, Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 6-1, 153-159. (In Russian).Bondarenko, N.V. Gohberg, L.M. Kovaleva, N.V. and etc. (2019), Education in numbers: 2019: brief statistical compilation, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.Povarich, I.P. and Slinkova, O.K. (2006), “Methodology and experience of sociological studying of job satisfaction”, Polzunovsky vestnik, 3-1, 221-224. (In Russian).Pryazhnikov, N.S. (2018), “Moral and psychological well-being of workers of the higher school in the "stable" of reforming the educational system”, Herald of Omsk University. Series Psychology, 1, 56-64. (In Russian).Reznik, S.D. and Vdovina, O.A. (2015), “Who becomes a teacher of high school: the motives of choice of scientific and pedagogical activities”, University Management: Practice and Analysis, 3 (97), 112-119. (In Russian).Rusinov, R.K. (2017), “On some ways out of the situation of deformation of the "Higher education" social institution”, Electronic supplement to the Russian Juridical Journal, 4, 7-12. (In Russian).Slinkov, A.M. (2016), “Uncovering information-analytic essence of monitoring in the system of management of organization through methodological and managerial approaches”, State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, 1, 43-49. (In Russian).Slinkov, A.M. (2014), “Labour − need − innovation: managerial and motivational aspect”, Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 8, 318-327. (In Russian).Slinkova, O.K. and Pastukhova, D.A. (2014), “National and psychological characteristics of the personnel working in Russian organizations”, Research Result. Business and Service Technologies, T. 1, 2(2), 85-91. (In Russian).Joint meeting of the Presidium of the State Council and the Council for Science and Education on February 6, 2020. URL:  http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62744 (Accessed 08 June 2020).Fadeeva, I.M. and Fedoseeva, M.V. (2015), “Subjective well-being of university teacher in society, in profession and in university”, Monitoring of Punlic Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 153-163. (in Russian).