2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-1-0-12283PEDAGOGICS<strong>The value-semantic matrix of social interaction experience of a future specialist in the humanitarian sphere</strong><strong>The value-semantic matrix of social interaction experience of a future specialist in the humanitarian sphere</strong>KovalenkoElena ViktorvonaKovalenkoElena Viktorvonarouser5450@list.ruPutilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia20217100

In the context of the deepening ideological crisis of humanitarian knowledge and public consciousness, higher education solves the problem of improving the training of future humanitarian specialists to work in this environment. One of the directions of its solution is enrichment of the experience of social interaction of future specialists in the humanitarian sphere (teachers, cultural workers, lawyers). The purpose of the article is to study the problem of enriching the value-semantic experience of students and to develop, on this basis, an appropriate matrix for a future specialist in the humanitarian sphere. Methodology and methods: a system-dialectical approach, which allows considering the individual system of worldview constructs of experience as a derivative of the system of cultural and historical experience; system analysis and synthesis, modeling of the structure and functions of experience. The experience of social interaction is considered as an integrated educational result of a competence-based pedagogical process. Its structure is composed of value-semantic, thought-activity and expressive-activity components, which have a matrix basis. The value-semantic matrix of the individual experience of social interaction is considered as a model of active reflection in the consciousness of the student of the basic values, cultural, moral and moral norms, traditions, customs, images and samples of socially significant ways of life and behavior of its citizens. The results of the study of the concept and functions of the cultural matrix, the role of the cultural matrix of the Russian world in regulating the behavior of large communities, groups and individuals are presented. Based on the system-dialectical approach, the structure and content of the matrix elements are substantiated. The elements of the value-semantic matrix are polar pairs of basic values of Russian culture, formed at the intersection of personal (values, goals, meanings) and activity (spheres of life) predictors. In the educational process, this matrix serves as a framework model of the value-semantic component of the student&#39;s social interaction experience, sets the conceptual content of his axiological field, serves as the basis for the choice of the axiological content of education and the development of diagnostic tools for determining the level of formation of the studied experience, is used as a methodological means of translating the methods of social interactions in pedagogical tasks.

In the context of the deepening ideological crisis of humanitarian knowledge and public consciousness, higher education solves the problem of improving the training of future humanitarian specialists to work in this environment. One of the directions of its solution is enrichment of the experience of social interaction of future specialists in the humanitarian sphere (teachers, cultural workers, lawyers). The purpose of the article is to study the problem of enriching the value-semantic experience of students and to develop, on this basis, an appropriate matrix for a future specialist in the humanitarian sphere. Methodology and methods: a system-dialectical approach, which allows considering the individual system of worldview constructs of experience as a derivative of the system of cultural and historical experience; system analysis and synthesis, modeling of the structure and functions of experience. The experience of social interaction is considered as an integrated educational result of a competence-based pedagogical process. Its structure is composed of value-semantic, thought-activity and expressive-activity components, which have a matrix basis. The value-semantic matrix of the individual experience of social interaction is considered as a model of active reflection in the consciousness of the student of the basic values, cultural, moral and moral norms, traditions, customs, images and samples of socially significant ways of life and behavior of its citizens. The results of the study of the concept and functions of the cultural matrix, the role of the cultural matrix of the Russian world in regulating the behavior of large communities, groups and individuals are presented. Based on the system-dialectical approach, the structure and content of the matrix elements are substantiated. The elements of the value-semantic matrix are polar pairs of basic values of Russian culture, formed at the intersection of personal (values, goals, meanings) and activity (spheres of life) predictors. In the educational process, this matrix serves as a framework model of the value-semantic component of the student&#39;s social interaction experience, sets the conceptual content of his axiological field, serves as the basis for the choice of the axiological content of education and the development of diagnostic tools for determining the level of formation of the studied experience, is used as a methodological means of translating the methods of social interactions in pedagogical tasks.

experiencesocial interactionvalue-semantic componentcultural matrixbasic valueexperiencesocial interactionvalue-semantic componentcultural matrixbasic valueСписок литературыAbdurazakov, M.M. and Shafranova, O.E. (2015), &ldquo;The development of the subjectivity of the higher school teacher as a task of their continuous education&rdquo;. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 6 (27), 90-99. (In Russian).Barkova, E.V. (2017), Kul&#39;turnaya matritsa globalizatsii [The cultural matrix of globalization], www. spkurdumova.ru (Accessed 31 January 2021).Verbitsky, A.A. (2012), &ldquo;Problem points of implementation of the competence approach&rdquo;, Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2, 52-60. (In Russian).Vinograi, E.G. (2014), Sistemno-dialekticheskiy podkhod: teoriya i metodologiya [A system-dialectical approach: theory and methodology], Kemerovo, Russia.Gromyko, Yu.V. (2019), Rossiyskaya sistema obrazovaniya segodnya: Reshayushchiy faktor razvitiya ili put&#39; v bezdnu? Obrazovaniye kak politicheskaya tekhnologiya [The Russian education system today: The decisive factor of development or the path to the abyss? Education as a political technology], LENAND, Moscow, Russia.Frank S.L. Comp. P.V. Alekseev (1992). Dukhovnyye osnovy obshchestva [The spiritual foundations of society], Republic, Moscow, Russia.Isaev, I.F. (2002), Professional&#39;no-pedagogicheskaya kul&#39;tura prepodavatelya [Professional and pedagogical culture of the teacher], Academy, Moscow, Russia.Klein, F. (1989), Lektsii o razvitii matematiki v XIX stoletii [Lectures on the development of mathematics in the XIX century], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.Kovalenko, E.V. (2019), &ldquo;Enriching the experience of social interaction of a future specialist: a theoretical aspect&rdquo;, Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Series: Humanities, 38 (4), 605-613. (In Russian).Kondakov, A.M., Sergeev I.S. (2020), &ldquo;The basic values of Russian civilization and their transformation at the stage of transition to a digital society&rdquo;, Pedagogy, 6, 5-23. (In Russian).The matrix of Russian culture: A myth? The engine of modernization? A barrier? (2012): A book on the materials of the Assembly of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, SWAP, Moscow, Russia.Sagatovsky, V.N. (1994), Russkaya ideya: prodolzhim li prervannyy put&#39;? [Russian idea: will we continue the interrupted path?] St. Petersburg, 217.Sereda, G.K. (1985), What is memory? Psychological Journal, 6(6), 42. (In Russian).Slobodchikov, V.I. (2013), Human psychology. Introduction to the psychology of subjectivity [The psychology of a person. Introduction to the psychology of subjectivity], PSTSU Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.Stepin, V. S. (2011), Civilization and culture [Civilization and culture], SPbGUP, St. Petersburg, Russia.Romm, T. A. (2012), &laquo;Theoretical conceptualization of social education in modern pedagogy&raquo;, Vestnik KSPU, 110-114. (In Russian).Fromm, E. To have or to be? (2014), Per. s engl. E. M. Telyatnikova.: AST, Moscow, 270.Arifin, F., Wigati F. and Lestari Z. (2013), &laquo;Typical Responses in Giving Evaluation: An Analysis of High and Low Context Culture Communication&raquo; Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 3(1), 85-92.Croucher, S.M., Bruno, A. and McGrath, P., et al. (2012), &laquo;Conflict Styles and High-Low Context Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Extension&raquo; // Communication Research Reports, 29 (1), 64-73. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.640093Rokeach, M. (1979), &ldquo;Some Unresolved Issues in Theories of Beliefs, Attitudes and Values&rdquo;, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 75.Schwartz, S.H. (2009). &ldquo;Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences&rdquo;, C.-Y. Chiu, Y.Y. Hong, S. Shavitt, R.S.Wyer (eds). Understanding culture: Theory, research and application. N.Y.: Psychology Press, 127-150.Ward, A.-K., Ravlin E.C. and Klaas B.S. et al. (2016), &ldquo;When do high-context communications speak up? Exploring contextual communication orientation and employee voice&rdquo;, Journal of Applied Psychology, 101 (10), 1498-1511. doi: 10.1037/apl0000144.