<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-2-0-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2404</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;The place of the virtual image of the individual in the perceptual processes of social interaction in virtual space&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;The place of the virtual image of the individual in the perceptual processes of social interaction in virtual space&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Rasina</surname><given-names>Evelina Osmanovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rasina</surname><given-names>Evelina Osmanovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>rasina.evelina@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2021/2/Расина.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Social interaction platforms on the Internet have a significant impact on the perception processes and users&amp;#39; social cognition. The interpersonal interaction effectiveness is due to the peculiarities of the visual-figurative reflection of the subjects of each other. At the interaction moment the subject is not the user himself/ herself, but only his/ her semantic reflection, the real personal image filled with symbols and signals, which contains information about him/ her and performs the translator function and the impression managing tool. The personal virtual image is considered as a source of information about the carrier-user. Perception occurs primarily through the prism of the personal experience who perceives the image. Its meaning-forming function is realized by means of generalization and semantic components interpretation. An idea about a particular person through social perception is formed, in which the social cognition mechanisms are actively involved. The main purpose of this article is to determine the personal virtual image place in the interpersonal perception processes in the social interaction act in the virtual space, as well as to identify the features of social perception in virtual space in comparison with the processes of real space. Methodology and methods: The research was carried out in real and virtual spaces. At the stage of the ascertaining experiment, the &amp;ldquo;Who am I?&amp;rdquo; test of M. Kuhn and T. McPartland was used as a psychodiagnostic technique to determine the psychological characteristics of the personality image perception in real and virtual space or &amp;ldquo;20 statements&amp;rdquo; as modified by T.V. Rumyantseva. The analysis of the results was carried out by means of content analysis. Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using the SPSS 23.0 software (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U-test). Results: Analysis of the research data showed that the social perception processes by subjects of interpersonal interaction in real and virtual spaces have a number of differences. Significant differences were noted in the perception of the personality image individual components. The study made it possible to identify a new personality image structural component that is not characteristic of real space &amp;ndash; the virtual Self, which is characterized by a high degree of personality&amp;#39;s activity virtualization (interaction with others, self-actualization, self-identification) and the acceptance of virtual space as a full-fledged environment for existence.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Social interaction platforms on the Internet have a significant impact on the perception processes and users&amp;#39; social cognition. The interpersonal interaction effectiveness is due to the peculiarities of the visual-figurative reflection of the subjects of each other. At the interaction moment the subject is not the user himself/ herself, but only his/ her semantic reflection, the real personal image filled with symbols and signals, which contains information about him/ her and performs the translator function and the impression managing tool. The personal virtual image is considered as a source of information about the carrier-user. Perception occurs primarily through the prism of the personal experience who perceives the image. Its meaning-forming function is realized by means of generalization and semantic components interpretation. An idea about a particular person through social perception is formed, in which the social cognition mechanisms are actively involved. The main purpose of this article is to determine the personal virtual image place in the interpersonal perception processes in the social interaction act in the virtual space, as well as to identify the features of social perception in virtual space in comparison with the processes of real space. Methodology and methods: The research was carried out in real and virtual spaces. At the stage of the ascertaining experiment, the &amp;ldquo;Who am I?&amp;rdquo; test of M. Kuhn and T. McPartland was used as a psychodiagnostic technique to determine the psychological characteristics of the personality image perception in real and virtual space or &amp;ldquo;20 statements&amp;rdquo; as modified by T.V. Rumyantseva. The analysis of the results was carried out by means of content analysis. Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using the SPSS 23.0 software (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U-test). Results: Analysis of the research data showed that the social perception processes by subjects of interpersonal interaction in real and virtual spaces have a number of differences. Significant differences were noted in the perception of the personality image individual components. The study made it possible to identify a new personality image structural component that is not characteristic of real space &amp;ndash; the virtual Self, which is characterized by a high degree of personality&amp;#39;s activity virtualization (interaction with others, self-actualization, self-identification) and the acceptance of virtual space as a full-fledged environment for existence.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>virtual personality image</kwd><kwd>social perception</kwd><kwd>social perception mechanisms</kwd><kwd>social network</kwd><kwd>attraction</kwd><kwd>stereotyping</kwd><kwd>identification</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>causal attribution</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>virtual personality image</kwd><kwd>social perception</kwd><kwd>social perception mechanisms</kwd><kwd>social network</kwd><kwd>attraction</kwd><kwd>stereotyping</kwd><kwd>identification</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>causal attribution</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Andreeva, G.M. (2001), Sotsial&amp;rsquo;naya psikhologiya [Social psychology], Aspekt Press, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Baranov, A.B. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Social perception in the context of interpersonal and textual interaction&amp;rdquo;, Pskihologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki. Vserossijskij zhurnal nauchnyh publikatsij, 46-48. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bodalev, A.A. (1982), Vospriyatie i ponimanie cheloveka chelovekom [Perception and understanding of man by man], Moscow University Press, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Vojskunskij, A. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Social perception in social networks&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14, Psikhologija, 2, 90-104. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Gavrilova, T.P. (1981), &amp;ldquo;Analysis of younger schoolchildren and younger adolescents&amp;rsquo; empathic experiences&amp;rdquo;, Psikhologija mezhlichnostnogo poznanija. Akad. ped. nauk SSSR, 122-139. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Gozman, L.Ja. (1987), Psikhologija emotsional&amp;#39;nyh otnoshenij [The psychology of emotional relationships], Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Dmitrieva, L.G. and Hamzina, D.V. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Features of the empathy manifestation among students &amp;minus; social networks users&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki, 1 (834), 175-187. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kelli G. (1984), Protsess kauzal&amp;#39;noy atributsii. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya sotsial&amp;#39;naya psikhologiya: teksty [The process of causal attribution. Contemporary foreign social psychology: texts], Izd. Moskovskogo universiteta, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Obydenkova V.K. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Interpersonal perception in the context of human cyber socialization in social networks of the Internet environment&amp;rdquo;, Sbornik dokladov v Mezhvuzovskoj konferencii &amp;ldquo;Eksperimental&amp;#39;nye issledovanija molodyh uchenyh po rezul&amp;#39;tatam issledovanij v oblasti psikhologii, pedagogiki, sotsiokul&amp;#39;turnoj antropologii&amp;rdquo;. 400-404. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Panferov V.N. (1982), &amp;ldquo;Cognitive standards and stereotypes of mutual understanding of people&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy psihologii. 5. 139-141. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Panferov V. N. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Theoretical consequences from the experience of human cognition by man&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 12 (3), Ch. II, 228-237. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Panferov V.N. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Methodological implications of studying social perception&amp;rdquo; Metodologija i istorija psikhologii, 4 (3), 142-153. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Rasina Je.O. (2019), &amp;ldquo;The concept of &amp;laquo;virtual image of the person&amp;raquo; in the conceptual field of psychology: the theoretical and methodological discourse&amp;rdquo; Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo inzhenerno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psikhologija, 2 (16), 66-69. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Ryaguzova E.V. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Sociocultural conditioning of the appearance perception of an unfamiliar other&amp;rdquo; Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Akmeologija obrazovanija. Psikhologija razvitija, 4, 2(14), 166-169. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Fomichenko A.S. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Social perception features&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2 (202), 17-21. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Shnajder M.I. 2016. &amp;ldquo;Empathy as a form of the others reflection&amp;rdquo;, Gumanizacija obrazovanija, 2, 60-65. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Folkes V.S. (1982). Forming relationships and the matching hypothesis.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 631-636.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Miller, R., Perlman, D. and Brehm, S (2006). Intimate Relationships.&amp;nbsp;New York: McGraw-Hill. (USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Moreland, Richard L. and Beach, Scott R. (1992). Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: journal, May, 28, 255-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Turkle, Sherry. The second self: computers and the human spirit / Sherry Turkle. 20th anniversary ed. The MIT Press; Twentieth Anniversary edition. (USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Walster, Elaine, G. William Walster, Ellen Berscheid and Karen Dion (1971).&amp;rdquo;Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis&amp;rdquo; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, March, 7 (2), 173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Wu, Y.J., Chang, Wei-Hung and Yuan, Chih-Hung (2015), &amp;ldquo;Do Facebook profile pictures reflect user&amp;rsquo;s personality?&amp;rdquo; Computers in Human Behavior. October 51, (Part B), 880-889.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>