<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-3-0-7</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2490</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of the manifestation of transfer in students in the educational process&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of the manifestation of transfer in students in the educational process&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Zhmurin</surname><given-names>Igor Evgenyevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhmurin</surname><given-names>Igor Evgenyevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>raketa302@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Korneichik</surname><given-names>Irina Victorovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Korneichik</surname><given-names>Irina Victorovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>iv.korneichik@mgou.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>State University of Education; Institute of Practical and Clinical Psychology, International University of Psychological and Pedagogical Innovations</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2021/3/Жмурин_Корнейчик.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The construction of transfer in relations is given a central place in the theoretical foundations of the psychodynamic approach. The uniqueness of transference, noted by Freud in 1912, is actively investigated in modern psychoanalysis and is considered not only within the framework of psychotherapeutic practice, but also woven into the problems of professional and personal relationships. The most complex and less studied, for the assessment of portable relationships, is the mental reality of the learning process, which includes the dynamics of individual moments of interaction of its participants and is based on the experience of previous relationships. This determined the idea of the study, which includes the study of the connection of the recreated past social experience of students in current relations with participants in the educational process. The purpose of the study was to study the features of the manifestation of transfer in students in the relationship &amp;ldquo;teacher-student&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;student-student&amp;rdquo;. The empirical study was conducted in 2020-2021, and, which preceded it, the analysis of scientific articles on the information platform made it possible to determine the directions of modern studies of transfer and highlight the most relevant indicators of its manifestation in the educational space of the university. Indicators of student relations are collected using the methodology &amp;ldquo;Questionnaire of interpersonal relations&amp;rdquo; by V. Schutz and evaluated in the relationship &amp;ldquo;student-teacher&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;student-student&amp;rdquo;. To study the manifestation of transfer in students within the framework of their relations in the space of the educational process, an author&amp;#39;s questionnaire was developed, based on the provisions of the questionnaire of L. Luborski&amp;#39;s helping relations. The results of empirical research in the form of correlation analysis of manifestations of transfer and indicators of relations within the framework of the student-teacher and student-student relations are presented. The results showed that in relations with classmates, the manifestation of transfer has a more rigid structure and this is expressed in a more active manifestation of transference, and in relations with the teacher, students are more prone to show autonomy, maintain control and are less focused on his social status.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The construction of transfer in relations is given a central place in the theoretical foundations of the psychodynamic approach. The uniqueness of transference, noted by Freud in 1912, is actively investigated in modern psychoanalysis and is considered not only within the framework of psychotherapeutic practice, but also woven into the problems of professional and personal relationships. The most complex and less studied, for the assessment of portable relationships, is the mental reality of the learning process, which includes the dynamics of individual moments of interaction of its participants and is based on the experience of previous relationships. This determined the idea of the study, which includes the study of the connection of the recreated past social experience of students in current relations with participants in the educational process. The purpose of the study was to study the features of the manifestation of transfer in students in the relationship &amp;ldquo;teacher-student&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;student-student&amp;rdquo;. The empirical study was conducted in 2020-2021, and, which preceded it, the analysis of scientific articles on the information platform made it possible to determine the directions of modern studies of transfer and highlight the most relevant indicators of its manifestation in the educational space of the university. Indicators of student relations are collected using the methodology &amp;ldquo;Questionnaire of interpersonal relations&amp;rdquo; by V. Schutz and evaluated in the relationship &amp;ldquo;student-teacher&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;student-student&amp;rdquo;. To study the manifestation of transfer in students within the framework of their relations in the space of the educational process, an author&amp;#39;s questionnaire was developed, based on the provisions of the questionnaire of L. Luborski&amp;#39;s helping relations. The results of empirical research in the form of correlation analysis of manifestations of transfer and indicators of relations within the framework of the student-teacher and student-student relations are presented. The results showed that in relations with classmates, the manifestation of transfer has a more rigid structure and this is expressed in a more active manifestation of transference, and in relations with the teacher, students are more prone to show autonomy, maintain control and are less focused on his social status.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>transference</kwd><kwd>psychoanalysis</kwd><kwd>relationships</kwd><kwd>students</kwd><kwd>educational process</kwd><kwd>professional boundaries</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>transference</kwd><kwd>psychoanalysis</kwd><kwd>relationships</kwd><kwd>students</kwd><kwd>educational process</kwd><kwd>professional boundaries</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Chumichova, I.V. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Aspekty consultativnoy praktiki pri rabote s problemami sotsializatsii podrostkov raznykh natsionalnostey v multiculturnom prostranstve&amp;rdquo;, Aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki psikhologicheskikh, pikhologo-pedagogicheskikh i pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy, 327-333. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Freud, Z. (1997), &amp;ldquo;O dinamike pereneseniya&amp;rdquo;, Psikhoanaliticheskie etyudy, 113-120. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Gabbard, G. and Lester, E. (2014), Psikhoanalyticheskie granitsy i ih narusheniya [Psychoanalytic boundaries and their transgressions], Klass, Moskow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Leaders, A.G. (2006), Psikhologicheskoe obsledovanie sem&amp;rsquo;i [Family psychological examination], Academy, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Luborski, L. (2003), Printsipy psikhoanaliticheskoy psikhoterapii [Principles of psychoanalytic psychotherapy], Kogito-Centr, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Timchenko, G.N., Chumichova, I.V. and Zhmurin I.E. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Problemy settinga v psikhoanaliticheskoy praktike v dotsifrovoy i tsifrovoy srede: sistematizirovanniy obzor literatury&amp;rdquo;, Chelovechesky capital, S12-2, 187-193. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Zhmurin, I.E. and Elovskikh A.E. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Rol&amp;rsquo; perenosa v otnosheniyah studentov-psikhologov&amp;rdquo;, XV Levitovskie chteniya, 199-208. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Zhmurin, I.E. and Trofimova A.P. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Analyz proyavleniya tipov mezhlichnostnikh otnosheniy u budutshikh psikhologov-consultantov s raznim urovnem sokhrannosti vnutrennikh granits lichnosti&amp;rdquo;, Chelovechesky capital, 6-2 (126), 478-482. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Zhmurin, I.E. and Trofimova A.P. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Kachestvenniy analiz osobennostey ponimaniya vnutrennikh granits lichnosti studentami psikhologami-consultantami&amp;rdquo;, Aktualnie problemi teorii i praktiki, 39-45. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Bird, S. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Managing professional boundaries&amp;rdquo;, Australian Family Physician (AFP) General Practice Psychiatry, 42 (9), 666-668, available from: http: // www.racgp.org.au/afp/2013/september/managing-professional-boundaries (Accessed 22 March 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Chen, J.A., Rosenberg, L.B., Schulman, B.J., Alpert, J.E. and Waldinger, R.J. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Reexamining the Call of Duty: Teaching Boundaries in Medical School&amp;rdquo;. Academic Medicine, 93 (11), 1624-1630, available at: doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002305 (Accessed 23 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Friedman, S.H. and Martinez, R.P. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Boundaries, Professionalism, and Malpractice in Psychiatry&amp;rdquo;, Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 17 (4), 365-371, available at: doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190019 (Accessed 23 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Gabbard, G.O. and Nadelson, C. (1995), &amp;ldquo;Professional boundaries in the physician-patient relationship&amp;rdquo;, JAMA, 273 (18), 1445-1449, available at: doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520420061039 (Accessed 28 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Gabbard, G.O. and Westen, D. (2003), &amp;ldquo;Rethinking therapeutic action&amp;rdquo;, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84 (4), 823-841, available at: doi: 10.1516/N4T0-4D5G-NNPL-H7NL (Accessed 13 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Gutheil, T.G. and Gabbard, G.O. (1993), &amp;ldquo;The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions&amp;rdquo;, American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 188-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Gutheil, T.G. and Gabbard, G.O. (1998), &amp;ldquo;Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings&amp;rdquo;, American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 409-414.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Jena, A.B, Seabury, S. and Lakdawalla, D. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Malpractice risk according to physician specialty&amp;rdquo;, The new England journal of Medicine, 365, 629-636.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Martinez, R. (2000), &amp;ldquo;A model for boundary dilemmas: ethical decision-making in the patient-professional relationship&amp;rdquo;, Ethical Human Sciences and Services, 2 (1), 43-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Reyes, N.H., Ruan, E. and Schiff, G.D. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Professional-Patient Boundaries: a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians&amp;#39; Attitudes and Practices&amp;rdquo;, Journal of general internal medicine, 35 (2), 457-464, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05543-0 (Accessed 23 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Rodriguez, C.I., Cabaniss, D.L., Arbuckle, M.R. and Oquendo, M.A. (2008), &amp;ldquo;The role of culture in psychodynamic psychotherapy: parallel process resulting from cultural similarities between patient and therapist&amp;rdquo;, American Journal of Psychiatry, 165 (11), 1402-1406, available at: doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020215 (Accessed 23 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Schiff, G.D. (2013), &amp;ldquo;A piece of my mind. Crossing boundaries-violation or obligation?&amp;rdquo;, JAMA, 310 (12), 1233-1234, available at: doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276133 (Accessed 23 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Situmorang, D.D.B. (2020), &amp;ldquo;The issues of transference and countertransference in tele-psychotherapy during COVID-19 outbreak&amp;rdquo;, Asian journal of psychiatry, 54: 102427, available at: doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102427 (Accessed 22 April 2021).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Yomans, F., Klarkin, D. and Kernberg, O. (2018), Transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Washington [etc.]: American psychiatric publishing, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>