<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2022-8-3-0-11</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2824</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;A study of cognitive characteristics in employees of small business: standardization of the method&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;A study of cognitive characteristics in employees of small business: standardization of the method&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Tishchenko</surname><given-names>Nikolay Anatolevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tishchenko</surname><given-names>Nikolay Anatolevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Luchinkina</surname><given-names>Irina Sergeevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Luchinkina</surname><given-names>Irina Sergeevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>miss_luchinkina@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><institution>Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2022/3/120-127.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. The features of the cognitive activity of the individual, which influence the perception of the image of the enterprise as a place of work, are analyzed. Regardless of the type of the prevailing organizational culture of the enterprise, the attitude of the staff to the enterprise may differ, and such differences are associated with cognitive distortions in the thinking of employees. However, there are no methods diagnosing these distortions in organizational activity. The purpose of the article is to describe the method of studying cognitive distortions of a person&amp;#39;s thinking in organizational activities. Methodology (materials) and methods: the author proposes the methodology &amp;ldquo;Cognitive distortions in organizational activity&amp;rdquo;, which allows to identify cognitive distortions of the staff. Results: in the course of the questionnaire standardization procedure, data on its reliability and validity were obtained, as well as data from the expert community, which allows us to conclude that the Cognitive Distortions in Organizational Activity questionnaire successfully realizes its goal: to study the cognitive attitudes of the individual in the perception of the organization. Reliable values were determined for each of the scales: dichotomy, catastrophic thinking and depreciation of the positive, emotional justification, labeling, mental filter, mind reading, personalization, obligation and overgeneralization. The calculated values of Cronbach&amp;#39;s &amp;alpha;-coefficient were in the range of 0.8-0.9, which indicates the development, balance and reliability of the questionnaire.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The features of the cognitive activity of the individual, which influence the perception of the image of the enterprise as a place of work, are analyzed. Regardless of the type of the prevailing organizational culture of the enterprise, the attitude of the staff to the enterprise may differ, and such differences are associated with cognitive distortions in the thinking of employees. However, there are no methods diagnosing these distortions in organizational activity. The purpose of the article is to describe the method of studying cognitive distortions of a person&amp;#39;s thinking in organizational activities. Methodology (materials) and methods: the author proposes the methodology &amp;ldquo;Cognitive distortions in organizational activity&amp;rdquo;, which allows to identify cognitive distortions of the staff. Results: in the course of the questionnaire standardization procedure, data on its reliability and validity were obtained, as well as data from the expert community, which allows us to conclude that the Cognitive Distortions in Organizational Activity questionnaire successfully realizes its goal: to study the cognitive attitudes of the individual in the perception of the organization. Reliable values were determined for each of the scales: dichotomy, catastrophic thinking and depreciation of the positive, emotional justification, labeling, mental filter, mind reading, personalization, obligation and overgeneralization. The calculated values of Cronbach&amp;#39;s &amp;alpha;-coefficient were in the range of 0.8-0.9, which indicates the development, balance and reliability of the questionnaire.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>cognitive distortions</kwd><kwd>personality</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>organizational activity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cognitive distortions</kwd><kwd>personality</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>organizational activity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Бек Дж. Когнитивная терапия: полное руководство: пер. с англ. М.: ООО &amp;laquo;И.Д. Вильямс&amp;raquo;. 2006. 400 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Гудкова Т.В. Особенности корпоративной культуры российских компаний: монография. М.: Проспект. 2016. 168 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Дробаха Ю.В. Корпоративная культура как фактор успешного развития компании (на примере &amp;laquo;большой четверки&amp;raquo;) // Реформы в России и проблемы управления. 2017. С. 39-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Егорова М.А. &amp;laquo;Когнитивное пространство&amp;raquo; и его соотношение с понятиями &amp;laquo;ментальное пространство&amp;raquo;, &amp;laquo;когнитивная база&amp;raquo;, &amp;laquo;концептосфера&amp;raquo;, &amp;laquo;картина мира&amp;raquo; // Вестник Иркутского государственного лингвистического университета. 2012. № 3. С. 61-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Лучинкина А.И., Тищенко Н.А. Методические особенности исследования корпоративной культуры организации // Человеческий капитал. 2021. № 7 (151). С. 87-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Лучинкина А.И., Тищенко Н.А. Особенности корпоративной культуры в организациях малого бизнеса // Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования. 2021. Т. 7. № 3. С. 96-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Лучинкина И.С. Когнитивные механизмы коммуникативного поведения в интернет-пространстве // Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования. 2018. Т. 4. № 3. С. 56-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Перекрестова В.А., Фурсова П.В. Корпоративная культура и ее роль в жизни организации // Человек. Социум. Общество. 2020. № 8. С. 15-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Проненко Е.А. Смысловые аспекты феномена совместного лидерства в команде // Инновационная наука: психология, педагогика, дефектология. 2019. Т. 2. № 1. С. 6-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Шарков Ф.И. Имидж фирмы: технологии управления: учебное пособие. М.: Академический проект. 2006. 272 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Эллис А. Гуманистическая психотерапия: Рационально-эмоциональный подход. М.: ЭКСМО-Пресс, 2002. 272 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Beck A.T., Freeman A. Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. Guilford Press New York, 2003. USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Beck A. T. et al. An Inventory for Measuring Depression // Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961. Т. 4. №6. P. 561-571.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>