<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2022-8-4-0-8</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2915</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of self-presentation of Russian teachers with &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;different levels of empathy&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of self-presentation of Russian teachers with &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;different levels of empathy&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chagina</surname><given-names>Alina Vladimirovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chagina</surname><given-names>Alina Vladimirovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>alinachagina90@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Kostroma State University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2022/4/Чагина.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. The modern educator needs to master new forms and methods of effective communication in his or her professional life. The problem of teachers&amp;#39; self-efficacy and successful self-presentation tactics is very relevant. In this regard, it becomes productive to study the relationship of empathy with self-presentation strategies and teaching styles among school teachers. The purpose of the article was to determine the relationship of empathy with the tactics of self-presentation of teachers. The main research methods are the &amp;ldquo;Teacher Empathy Scale&amp;rdquo; (Wang, et al, 2022), the questionnaire &amp;ldquo;Teacher Roles Scale&amp;rdquo; (Stojiljković, et al, 2012) and the questionnaire &amp;ldquo;Scale of self-presentation tactics&amp;rdquo; (Lee, et al, 1999). 116 teachers from the regions of Russia took part in the survey, 94.5% of them were women. SPSS 19.0 programs were used for data processing. Research results: the most common tactics of self-presentation among Russian teachers are apology, role model and renunciation. Among the least popular are bullying, negative evaluation of others, exaggeration of their achievements. The tactics of self-presentation were associated with the level of empathy: the closest relationship was revealed with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;attractive behavior&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;request/ plea&amp;rdquo;. The tactics of self-presentation turned out to be interrelated with the teaching roles: the pedagogical role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;hindering oneself&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;communicating one&amp;#39;s achievements&amp;rdquo;, as well as &amp;ldquo;an example to follow&amp;rdquo;. The motivational role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;hindering oneself&amp;rdquo;, the cognitive-diagnostic role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;role model&amp;rdquo;. The role in affective interaction is interrelated with the tactics of self-presentation: &amp;ldquo;justification with denial of responsibility&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;justification with acceptance of responsibility&amp;rdquo;, as well as with &amp;ldquo;desire/effort to please&amp;rdquo;. Conclusions: the most preferred strategies of self-presentation among Russian teachers are avoidance as evasion of responsibility and avoidance of decisive actions and attractive behavior as behavior that causes a favorable impression of the subject of self-presentation. This should be taken into account when building work with teachers in the school system.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The modern educator needs to master new forms and methods of effective communication in his or her professional life. The problem of teachers&amp;#39; self-efficacy and successful self-presentation tactics is very relevant. In this regard, it becomes productive to study the relationship of empathy with self-presentation strategies and teaching styles among school teachers. The purpose of the article was to determine the relationship of empathy with the tactics of self-presentation of teachers. The main research methods are the &amp;ldquo;Teacher Empathy Scale&amp;rdquo; (Wang, et al, 2022), the questionnaire &amp;ldquo;Teacher Roles Scale&amp;rdquo; (Stojiljković, et al, 2012) and the questionnaire &amp;ldquo;Scale of self-presentation tactics&amp;rdquo; (Lee, et al, 1999). 116 teachers from the regions of Russia took part in the survey, 94.5% of them were women. SPSS 19.0 programs were used for data processing. Research results: the most common tactics of self-presentation among Russian teachers are apology, role model and renunciation. Among the least popular are bullying, negative evaluation of others, exaggeration of their achievements. The tactics of self-presentation were associated with the level of empathy: the closest relationship was revealed with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;attractive behavior&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;request/ plea&amp;rdquo;. The tactics of self-presentation turned out to be interrelated with the teaching roles: the pedagogical role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;hindering oneself&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;communicating one&amp;#39;s achievements&amp;rdquo;, as well as &amp;ldquo;an example to follow&amp;rdquo;. The motivational role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;hindering oneself&amp;rdquo;, the cognitive-diagnostic role is interconnected with the tactics of &amp;ldquo;role model&amp;rdquo;. The role in affective interaction is interrelated with the tactics of self-presentation: &amp;ldquo;justification with denial of responsibility&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;justification with acceptance of responsibility&amp;rdquo;, as well as with &amp;ldquo;desire/effort to please&amp;rdquo;. Conclusions: the most preferred strategies of self-presentation among Russian teachers are avoidance as evasion of responsibility and avoidance of decisive actions and attractive behavior as behavior that causes a favorable impression of the subject of self-presentation. This should be taken into account when building work with teachers in the school system.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>empathy</kwd><kwd>tactics of self-presentation in teachers</kwd><kwd>secondary school</kwd><kwd>teacher roles</kwd><kwd>Russian teachers</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>empathy</kwd><kwd>tactics of self-presentation in teachers</kwd><kwd>secondary school</kwd><kwd>teacher roles</kwd><kwd>Russian teachers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Anokhina, N.F. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Teacher&amp;#39;s self-presentation in the Internet space&amp;rdquo;, Educational technologies, 4, 135-144. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bozhovich, L.I. (1995), Izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye trudy: Problemy formirovaniya lichnosti [Selected psychological manuscripts: Problems of personality formation], Mezhdunarod. ped. akad., Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Gavrilova, T.P. (1975), &amp;ldquo;The concept of &amp;ldquo;empathy&amp;rdquo; in foreign psychology&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy psikhologii, 2, 147-158. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Glukhikh, S.I. (2012), &amp;ldquo;The image of a modern teacher as a condition for the formation of professional competence&amp;rdquo;, National education, 2, 112-116. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Gofman, I. (2000), Predstavleniye sebya drugim v povsednevnoy zhizni [Presenting yourself to others in everyday life], &amp;ldquo;KANON-press&amp;rdquo;, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Deineka, O.S. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Multifactorial questionnaire in the diagnosis of socio-economic consciousness&amp;rdquo;, Psychology. Economy. Law, 2, 22-26. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Donskaya, L. Ju. (2004), &amp;ldquo;Presenting yourself to others in everyday life&amp;rdquo;, Abstract of Ph. D. dissertation, Stavropol&amp;#39;, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Dukhanina, L.N. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Cooperation of preschool education organizations and the parent community in the conditions of modern challenges&amp;rdquo;, Upbringing and education of young children, 5, 577-579. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Dukhanina, L.N. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Infrastructure of giftedness, or will we live until Monday?&amp;rdquo;, Psychological science and education, 2020. 4, 31-40. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Dukhanina, L.N., Sobkin, V.S. and Adamchuk, D.V. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Modern teacher: satisfaction with material status&amp;rdquo;, Pedagogical education in the CIS member States: modern problems, concepts, theories and practice, Materials of the VII International. scientific. Practical, 48-58. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Ilyin, E.P. (2000), Motivatsiya i motivy [Motivation and motives], Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Inozemtseva, L.P. (2011), &amp;ldquo;The image of a teacher as a component of his/her professional personality&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 24, 231-232. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Kipurova, S.N. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Development of empathy of the future teacher in the process of studying pedagogical disciplines&amp;rdquo;, Abstract of Ph. D. dissertation, Tula, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Klimenko, A.A., Hazova, S.A. and Karaseva, S.A. (2018), Samoprezentatsionnaya kompetentnost: soderzhaniye i osnovy formirovaniya [Self-presentation competence: content and basics of formation], KubGAU, Krasnodar, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Kolmogorova, L.S. and Spiridonova, G.G. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Characteristics of self-presentation in the context of the ratio of internal and external components of human culture&amp;rdquo;, The world of science, culture and education, 4(53), 180-182. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kulagina, N.V. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Features of self-presentation of men and women in the field of business relations&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 3(27), 122-128. doi: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-3-122-128. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Lazurskij, A.F. (1995), Ocherk nauki o kharakterakh [An essay on the science of characters], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Maksimenko, A.A., Pichugina, E.G. (2012), Kontrmarketing tabakokureniya [Countermarketing of tobacco smoking], Kostroma State University, Kostroma, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Obozov, N.N. (1995), Psikhologicheskaya kultura otnosheniy [Psychological culture of relationships], AO NPO CKTI, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Pikuleva, O.A. (2005), &amp;ldquo;Self-presentation of personality in the process of social interaction&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Political science. International relations, 1, 85-91. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Pikuleva O.A., Chiker V.A. (2010), Taktiki samoprezentatsii. Psikhologiya menedzhmenta [Tactics of self-presentation], Peter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Pikuleva, O.A. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Psychology of self-presentation of personality: gender and age aspects&amp;rdquo;, Psychological science and education, 4, 37-44. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Pikuleva, O.A. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Classifications of personality self-presentation: theoretical foundations and problematic aspects&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin, 5(1), 63-69. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Pikuleva, O.A. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Social psychology of personality self-presentation&amp;rdquo;, Abstract of Ph. D. dissertation, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Salamatina, Ju.V. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Types of empathy in teaching&amp;rdquo;, Azimut of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology, 8, 4(29), 193-196. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Semenova, L.Je. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Features of self-presentation of male secondary school teachers in the context of their professional activity&amp;rdquo;, Psychological Science and education, 1, 82-89. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Chekalina, A.A. (2012), &amp;ldquo;About the peculiarities of self-presentation of female teachers&amp;rdquo;, Theory and practice of social development, 3, 85-88. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Cooper, D.B. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Teachers as Moral Models? The Role of Empathy in Relationships between Pupils and their Teachers&amp;rdquo;, Ledds: Leeds Metropolitan University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Davis, M. (1983), &amp;ldquo;Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach&amp;rdquo; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113-126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Gherghinescu, R. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Anotimpurile empatiei: Psihologie sociala cognitive&amp;rdquo;, Bucureşti: Editura, Atos.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Goffman, E. (1959), The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Goleman, D. (1995), Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books Inc, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Guilford, J.P. (1959), Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Hoffman, M. (1978), &amp;ldquo;Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation&amp;rdquo;, Developmental Psychology, 11, 607-622. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Hogan, R. (1969), &amp;ldquo;Development of an empathy scale&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Johnson, J.A., Cheek, J.M. and Smither, R. (1983), &amp;ldquo;The Structure of empathy&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1299-1312. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Jones, E.E., Pittman, T.S. and Jones, E.E. (1982), &amp;ldquo;Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation&amp;rdquo;, In: Suls, J., Ed., Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 1, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Lăzărescu, M.P. (2013), &amp;ldquo;The Structure and Dynamics of the Teacher&amp;rsquo;s Empathic Behavior&amp;rdquo;, Procedia &amp;ndash; Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 511-515.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-J., Quigley, B.M., Nesler, M.S., Corbett, A.B. and Tedeschi, J. (1999), &amp;ldquo;Development of a self-presentation tactics scale&amp;rdquo;, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 701-722.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Maucorps, P.-H. and Bassoul, R. (1961), &amp;ldquo;Empathies et connaissance d&amp;#39;autrui&amp;rdquo;, Revue fran&amp;ccedil;aise de sociologie Ann&amp;eacute;e, 2-1,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>109-111. (In Franse).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Mehrabian, A. and Epstein, N. (1972), &amp;ldquo;A measure of emotional empathy&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Myers, D.G. (2010), Self presentation. Social psychology, McGraw-Hill, NY USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Stojiljković, S., Djigić, G. and Zlatković, B. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Empathy and Teachers&amp;rsquo; Roles. Procedia &amp;ndash; Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 69, 960-966. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Suryaningrat, R.D., Mangunsong, F.M. and Riantoputra, C.D. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Teachers&amp;#39; aggressive behaviors: what is considered acceptable and why?&amp;rdquo; Heliyon. 6(10). e05082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05082.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney,&amp;nbsp;J., Fine, D., Smith, R. and Wei, l L. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short)&amp;rdquo;, Personality and Individual Differences,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>41, 929-940.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Zhang, L., Peng, Y., Lu, J., Huang, Y. and Chen, W. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Development and validation of the empathy scale for teachers (EST)&amp;rdquo;, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72, 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101112.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>