2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2023-9-4-0-83292PSYCHOLOGY<strong>Features of marital attitudes in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication</strong><strong>Features of marital attitudes in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication</strong>GutYulia NikolaevnaGutYulia Nikolaevnagut.julya@yandex.ruOvsyanikovaElena AlekseevnaOvsyanikovaElena Alekseevnaovsyannikova@bsuedu.ruDoroninaNatalia NikolaevnaDoroninaNatalia Nikolaevnadoronina@bsuedu.ruLubkovaAnastasia AlexandrovnaLubkovaAnastasia Alexandrovnaubkova.nastia@yandex.ruFederal Research Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research, Sh. Rashidov Samarkand State UniversityBelgorod State National Research UniversityMoscow Psychological and Social University20239400

Introduction. Psychotherapeutic communication is one of the most important characteristics of family relationships. Psychotherapeutic communication, as a rule, refers to loyalty to a partner, his acceptance, as well as empathy, respect, sincerity and congruence in relation to a communication partner. One of the main functions of the family is considered to be an emotional or psychotherapeutic function, it is this function that determines the degree of satisfaction with marital relations. To implement this function of the family, the coincidence or consistency of marital attitudes is required. The purpose of the study: to study the features of marital attitudes and indicators of communication in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication. Materials and methods: the study involved men (N=69) and women (N=129), a total sample of N=198 married people. All participants of the study were divided into 2 groups: spouses with high and low indicators on the scale of &ldquo;Psychotherapeutic communication&rdquo; (methodology &ldquo;Peculiarities of communication between spouses&rdquo;). The following techniques were used: &ldquo;Features of communication between spouses&rdquo; (Yu.E. Alyoshina, L.Ya. Gozman, E.M. Dubovskaya); a questionnaire &ldquo;Measuring attitudes in a married couple&rdquo; (Yu.E. Alyoshina, L.Ya. Gozman, E.M. Dubovskaya); &ldquo;Methodology for diagnosing interpersonal relationships&rdquo; (T.&nbsp;Leary). The results: approximately 50% of the spouses who participated in our study have a high level of psychotherapeutic communication and about the same number of respondents have a low level of psychotherapeutic communication in a couple. Spouses with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication in the family are more characterized by such features of interpersonal relationships as dominance, energy, authority, self-confidence. They also know how to show gentleness, delicacy, empathy, care, affection, conformity and loyalty to the partner&#39;s position, have a &ldquo;famil&rdquo; language and similar views. Their ability to take the initiative in solving problems, as well as the presence of their own point of view and the ability to defend it determines a higher level of psychotherapeutic communication between spouses. Spouses with a low level of psychotherapeutic communication in the family are more likely to show flexibility, search for compromises and constructive ways to resolve conflicts, submission and denial of responsibility. For spouses with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication, the sexual sphere in family life seems to be less significant than for spouses with a low level of psychotherapeutic communication. In families with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication, a less optimistic view of people and a lesser degree of importance of children in family life were found. Conclusion. The hypothesis that there are differences in the characteristics of marital attitudes in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication has been fully confirmed.

Introduction. Psychotherapeutic communication is one of the most important characteristics of family relationships. Psychotherapeutic communication, as a rule, refers to loyalty to a partner, his acceptance, as well as empathy, respect, sincerity and congruence in relation to a communication partner. One of the main functions of the family is considered to be an emotional or psychotherapeutic function, it is this function that determines the degree of satisfaction with marital relations. To implement this function of the family, the coincidence or consistency of marital attitudes is required. The purpose of the study: to study the features of marital attitudes and indicators of communication in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication. Materials and methods: the study involved men (N=69) and women (N=129), a total sample of N=198 married people. All participants of the study were divided into 2 groups: spouses with high and low indicators on the scale of &ldquo;Psychotherapeutic communication&rdquo; (methodology &ldquo;Peculiarities of communication between spouses&rdquo;). The following techniques were used: &ldquo;Features of communication between spouses&rdquo; (Yu.E. Alyoshina, L.Ya. Gozman, E.M. Dubovskaya); a questionnaire &ldquo;Measuring attitudes in a married couple&rdquo; (Yu.E. Alyoshina, L.Ya. Gozman, E.M. Dubovskaya); &ldquo;Methodology for diagnosing interpersonal relationships&rdquo; (T.&nbsp;Leary). The results: approximately 50% of the spouses who participated in our study have a high level of psychotherapeutic communication and about the same number of respondents have a low level of psychotherapeutic communication in a couple. Spouses with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication in the family are more characterized by such features of interpersonal relationships as dominance, energy, authority, self-confidence. They also know how to show gentleness, delicacy, empathy, care, affection, conformity and loyalty to the partner&#39;s position, have a &ldquo;famil&rdquo; language and similar views. Their ability to take the initiative in solving problems, as well as the presence of their own point of view and the ability to defend it determines a higher level of psychotherapeutic communication between spouses. Spouses with a low level of psychotherapeutic communication in the family are more likely to show flexibility, search for compromises and constructive ways to resolve conflicts, submission and denial of responsibility. For spouses with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication, the sexual sphere in family life seems to be less significant than for spouses with a low level of psychotherapeutic communication. In families with a high level of psychotherapeutic communication, a less optimistic view of people and a lesser degree of importance of children in family life were found. Conclusion. The hypothesis that there are differences in the characteristics of marital attitudes in families with different levels of psychotherapeutic communication has been fully confirmed.

familymarriagefamily relationspsychotherapeutic communicationinterpersonal relations of spousessatisfaction with marriagemarital attitudesfamilymarriagefamily relationspsychotherapeutic communicationinterpersonal relations of spousessatisfaction with marriagemarital attitudesСписок литературыGrishina, A.V. and Prudnik, A.N. (2022), &ldquo;The level of satisfaction with marital and family relations in connection with the specifics of the value-semantic sphere of married couples&rdquo;, Don State University, 2, 70-84 (In Russian).Evgrafova, Yu.A. (2014), &ldquo;Socio-psychological factors of adaptation of spouses in young married couples&rdquo;, Penza State University, 2(18), 34-39 (In Russian).Zakharov, A.I. (1981), &ldquo;Psychological features of diagnostics of optimization of relations in a conflict family&rdquo;, Questions of psychology, 3, 58-68 (In Russian).Monina, G.B. (2011), &ldquo;Emotional intelligence as a factor of personal and professional growth&rdquo;, Educational notes of the St. Petersburg University of Technologies and Management of Economics, 3(33), 84-96 (In Russian).Pecherkina, A.A., Ershova, I.A. and Novikova, O.V. (2019), &ldquo;Study of attitudes of spouses with varying degrees of satisfaction with marriage&rdquo;, Ural State Pedagogical University, 9, 163-168 (In Russian).Puzyreva, L.A. and Arsenyeva, L.A. (2020), &ldquo;Factors influencing marriage satisfaction in young and mature families&rdquo;, Penza State University, 115-118 (In Russian).Rosina, N.L. and Kozlovskikh, O.S. (2018), &ldquo;The influence of family communication on marriage satisfaction in early adulthood&rdquo;, Vyatka State University, 1, 104-109 (In Russian).Safina, N.H. (2004), &ldquo;Features of marital relations at various stages of the formation of a young family&rdquo;, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Kazan,&nbsp;Russia.Chumakova, Yu.A. and Korochentseva, A.V. (2019), Rol udovletvoryonnosti brakom i mezhlichnostnogo obsheniya v formirovanii otnosheniya k vneshnemu obliku supruga [The role of satisfaction with marriage and interpersonal communication in the formation of attitudes to the appearance of the spouse], Credo, Moscow, Russia.Schneider, L.B. (2008), Semeynaya problematika v empiricheskih issledovaniyah [Family problems in empirical research], Moscow Psychological and Social Institute, Moscow, Russia.Ellis, A. (2001), Gumanisticheskaya psikhoterapiya. Ratsionalno-emotsionalniy podkhod [Humanistic psychotherapy. Rational-emotional approach], Sova, St. Petersburg, Russia.Brown-Baatjies, O, Fouch&eacute;, P, Greeff, A. (2008), &ldquo;The development and relevance of the resiliency model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation&rdquo;, Acta Academy, 40(1), 78-126 (In Hungary).Lee, E. and Roberts, L.J. (2018), &ldquo;Between individual and family coping: a decade of theory and research on couples coping with health‐related stress&rdquo;,&nbsp;J FamTheoryRev, 10(1), 141-164, (In USA).Lavee, Y., McCubbin, H.I. and Olson, D.H. (1987), &ldquo;The effect of stressful life events and transitions on family functioning and wellbeing&rdquo;, J MarriageFam, 49(4), 857-873, (UK).Lavee, Y. and Olson, D.H. (1991), &ldquo;Family types and response to stress&rdquo;,&nbsp;J MarriageFam, 53(3). P. 786-798 (UK).Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Poston, D., Summers, J.A. and Turnbull, A. (2006), &ldquo;Assessing family outcomes: Psychometric evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale&rdquo;, J MarriageFam, 68, 1069-1083 (UK).Garc&iacute;a-Moya, I., Moreno, Ca. and Jim&eacute;nez-Iglesias, A. (2013), &ldquo;Understanding the joint effects of family and other developmental contexts on the sense of coherence (SOC): A person-focused analysis using the Classification Tree&rdquo;, Journal of Adolescence, 5, 913-923, (In Spain).Grevenstein, D., Bluemke, M., Schweitzer, J. and Aguilar-Raab, C. (2019), &ldquo;Better family relationships &ndash; higher well-being: The connection between relationship quality and health related resources&rdquo;, Mental Health &amp; Prevention, 6, 160-200 (In Australia).