<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-2-0-6</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3458</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Resources of psychological safety of the personality of a higher school teacher in modern conditions&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Resources of psychological safety of the personality of a higher school teacher in modern conditions&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kuzmina</surname><given-names>Galina Anatolievna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuzmina</surname><given-names>Galina Anatolievna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Gal_k_a_@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2024/2/Кузьмина.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. The present time is characterized by acute social events and phenomena that form new, constantly changing, and often dangerous challenges, both for each individual and for society. In this regard, even greater demands are placed on the activities of a higher school teacher, which, due to its specificity, is closely associated with intense psychological, social and psychophysiological tension, and additional risks appear. The issue of qualitative study of the psychological safety of teachers from the point of view of its preservation and strengthening, through the allocation and analysis of its resources, is relevant. The purpose of the empirical study is to identify and study the resources of psychological security of the personality of a teacher of educational institutions of higher education. Materials and methods. The study was based on 672 respondents belonging to the faculty and administrative staff of educational institutions of higher education from nine federal districts of the Russian Federation. As diagnostic tools, individual questionnaires and author&amp;#39;s psychometric scale questionnaires (based on the principle of the Likert scale) were used, formed on the basis of the results of the analysis of the works of domestic and foreign authors on the problem of psychological safety in general and its resources in particular. The reliability of the results of the study is ensured by the application of mathematical statistics methods during processing, namely: analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results. It was revealed that of the 13 allocated psychological safety resources, the most significant for higher school teachers include: &amp;ldquo;stress tolerance&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;ability to adapt to any life situation&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;resistance to various external influences (psychological, informational, etc.)&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;physical health&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;feeling of personal well-being&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;the possibility of self-realization&amp;rdquo;. The least significant resource was &amp;ldquo;material security&amp;rdquo;. The gender, age, professional and territorial features of assessing the resources of psychological security of a person who carries out his activities in educational institutions of higher education within the framework of modern environmental conditions are revealed. Conclusion. Teachers of higher educational institutions are highly responsible for high-quality and successful training, and the formation of future specialists, from the position of social, labor and intellectual resources of the country. The study of the psychological safety of this category of persons, taking into account the circumstances and conditions of the present time, is an urgent and priority area. The 13 psychological safety resources identified as a result of the study, as well as the significant differences found in their assessment, make it possible to create and expand diagnostic tools, as well as programs and methods for the formation, strengthening, preservation and correction of psychological safety of higher school teachers.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The present time is characterized by acute social events and phenomena that form new, constantly changing, and often dangerous challenges, both for each individual and for society. In this regard, even greater demands are placed on the activities of a higher school teacher, which, due to its specificity, is closely associated with intense psychological, social and psychophysiological tension, and additional risks appear. The issue of qualitative study of the psychological safety of teachers from the point of view of its preservation and strengthening, through the allocation and analysis of its resources, is relevant. The purpose of the empirical study is to identify and study the resources of psychological security of the personality of a teacher of educational institutions of higher education. Materials and methods. The study was based on 672 respondents belonging to the faculty and administrative staff of educational institutions of higher education from nine federal districts of the Russian Federation. As diagnostic tools, individual questionnaires and author&amp;#39;s psychometric scale questionnaires (based on the principle of the Likert scale) were used, formed on the basis of the results of the analysis of the works of domestic and foreign authors on the problem of psychological safety in general and its resources in particular. The reliability of the results of the study is ensured by the application of mathematical statistics methods during processing, namely: analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results. It was revealed that of the 13 allocated psychological safety resources, the most significant for higher school teachers include: &amp;ldquo;stress tolerance&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;ability to adapt to any life situation&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;resistance to various external influences (psychological, informational, etc.)&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;physical health&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;feeling of personal well-being&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;the possibility of self-realization&amp;rdquo;. The least significant resource was &amp;ldquo;material security&amp;rdquo;. The gender, age, professional and territorial features of assessing the resources of psychological security of a person who carries out his activities in educational institutions of higher education within the framework of modern environmental conditions are revealed. Conclusion. Teachers of higher educational institutions are highly responsible for high-quality and successful training, and the formation of future specialists, from the position of social, labor and intellectual resources of the country. The study of the psychological safety of this category of persons, taking into account the circumstances and conditions of the present time, is an urgent and priority area. The 13 psychological safety resources identified as a result of the study, as well as the significant differences found in their assessment, make it possible to create and expand diagnostic tools, as well as programs and methods for the formation, strengthening, preservation and correction of psychological safety of higher school teachers.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>psychological safety</kwd><kwd>psychological safety resources</kwd><kwd>teachers</kwd><kwd>educational organizations of higher education</kwd><kwd>educational environment</kwd><kwd>assessment of psychological safety resources</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>psychological safety</kwd><kwd>psychological safety resources</kwd><kwd>teachers</kwd><kwd>educational organizations of higher education</kwd><kwd>educational environment</kwd><kwd>assessment of psychological safety resources</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Аллахверанова Т.Ф. Психологическая устойчивость личности // Аллея науки. 2020. 1(28). С. 270-274.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Баева И.А. Психологическое проектирование профессиональной деятельности педагога в условиях неопределенности // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. 2017. 186. С.&amp;nbsp;13-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Баева И.А., Гаязова Л.А., Кондакова И.В. Личностные ресурсы психологической безопасности подростков и молодежи в образовательной среде // Интеграция образования. 2021. 25, 3(104). С. 482-497.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Гвоздецкая В.К. Психологические особенности мужчин и женщин в различные периоды возрастных кризисов // Sciences of Europe. 2019. 9. С. 12-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Груздева М.А., Калачикова О.Н. Социокультурные характеристики населения регионов Северо-Западного федерального округа: общее и особенности // Вестник удмуртского университета. 2019. 3. С. 306-317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Губин В.А., Казанков В.В. Психология устойчивости: объективная и субъективная сторона устойчивости человека // Высшее образование в современном мире: история и перспективы. 2020. 1. С. 207-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Кондратюк Н.Г. Надежность осознанной саморегуляция как ресурс психологической безопасности личности в условиях стресса и неопределенности // Психология саморегуляции в контексте актуальных задач образования: Материалы научной конференции, Москва, 27-28 апреля 2021 года. 156-161. DOI 10.24412/cl-36466-2021-1-156-161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Корчевский А.М. Здоровье преподавателя - основа эффективности педагогического процесса // Вестник Амурского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2016. 74. С. 137-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Крежевских О.В. Проектирование профессиональной биографии как предиктор непрерывного профессионального самоопределения и обучения педагога. Перспективы науки и образования. 2020. 6(48). С. 430-445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Кузьмина Г.А. Современные угрозы психологической безопасности личности в глобальной сети Интернет // Социальная реальность виртуального пространства: материалы IV Международной научной конференции. Иркутск: Издательство ИГУ. 2020. С. 157-164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Манжос Л.В. Особенности профессиональной самореализации педагогов в современных условиях // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 3: Педагогика и психология. 2015. 3(162). С. 83-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Рыжов А.Я. Психофизиологическая характеристика профессиональной деятельности преподавателей вуза // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика и психология. 2015. 2. С. 5-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Северова Е.А. Изучение стрессоустойчивости и степени эмоциональной реактивности у мужчин и женщин // Научно-методический электронный журнал &amp;laquo;Концепт&amp;raquo;. 2016. 11. С. 801-805.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Трофимова Е.Л., Кузьмина Г.А. Психологическая безопасность личности педагога в условиях неопределенности // Известия Иркутского государственного университета. Серия Психология. 2022. 39. С. 54-75. doi: 10.26516/2304-1226.2022.39.54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Шиняева О.В. Преподаватели-гуманитарии в российских вузах: кризис профессиональной группы или адаптация к &amp;laquo;новой нормальности&amp;raquo;? // Наука. Культура. Общество. 2022. 1. С. 76-89. doi: 10.19181/nko.2022.28.1.7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Юнусова С.Г., Розенталь А.Н., Балтина Т.В. Стресс. Биологический и психологический аспекты // Ученые записки Казанского государственного университета. 2018. 150(3). С. 139-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Ясвин В.А. Исследования образовательной среды в отечественной психологии: от методологических дискуссий к эмпирическим результатам // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2018. 18(1). С. 80-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Genn J.M. AMEE medical education guide no. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in education &amp;ndash; a unifying perspective // Med. Teach. 2011. 23(5). P. 445-454.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Gong S. Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: integration of the employee proactivity, in-formation exchange, and psychological safety perspectives // J. Manag. 2012. 38(5). Р. 1611-1633.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Janoff-Bulman R. Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma // N.Y. Free Press. 2016. 4(28). Р. 24-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Miller J.G. Living Systems // McGraw-Hill. 2018. 3. Р. 222-228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Moos R.H. The social climate scales: an overview // Consulting Psychologists Press. 2014. 14. Р. 340-348.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Sch&amp;ouml;nrock-Adema J., Bouwkamp-Timmer T., van Hell E.A. Key elements in assessing the educational environment: Where is the theory? // Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2017. 17. Р. 727-742.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Shehnaz S.I. Development and validation of the AMEET inventory: An instrument measuring medical faculty members perceptions of their educational environment // Med. Teach. 2014. 26. Р. 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Wells J.C., Baldwin E.D. Historic preservation, significance, and age value: A comparative phenomenology of historic Charleston and the nearby new-urbanist community of I&amp;rsquo;On // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2012. 32(4). Р. 384-400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Zhong J., You J., Gan Y. Job stress, burnout, depression symptoms, and physical health among Chinese university teachers // Psychological Reports. 2019. 105. Р. 124-1254.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>