Список литературы

2313-8971

Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education

2313-8971

10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-3-1-0

3521

PSYCHOLOGY

<strong>The relationship of technophobia and technophilia with intrasubjective factors in representatives of different age groups</strong><br />  

Saenko

Aleksey Yuryevich

Saenko

Aleksey Yuryevich

a.y.saenko@yandex.ru

Russian State Social University

2024

10300

Introduction. The implementation of “intelligent” systems capable of independently collecting, processing and analyzing information opens up wide opportunities and prospects, but also puts society in front of complex challenges and dilemmas, which is reflected in the attitude of the individual to such systems and technologies. It is important that the active integration of the latest achievements of science and technology into everyday life is commensurate with the psychological readiness of society for appropriate innovative transformations. In this regard, the issue of identifying psychological factors related to an overly open attitude to technology (technophilia) and fear of technology (technophobia) becomes extremely relevant, which will contribute to achieving a balance with regard to new technologies and increasing the reflexivity of society regarding possible technological risks in the near future. The purpose of the empirical study is to study the relationship between technophilia and technophobia in representatives of different age groups with intrasubjective factors. Materials and methods. The study involved 240 respondents aged 20 to 51 years (Mage=31.31; SD=11.54), of which 113 men (Mage=31.87; SD=12.28) and 127 women (Mage=30.81; SD=10.86). The following standardised methods were used: the Schwartz’s PVQ-21 value questionnaire, the A.B. Kupreichenko's methodology "Trust/distrust of personality in the world, self and other people", “Technophilia” and “Technophobia” scales of the attitude to technology questionnaire by G.U. Soldatova et al. Results. The specificity of technophobia and technophilia in representatives of the youthful (20-21 years old) middle (38-51 years old) age is shown. The interrelationships of technophobia and technophilia with intrasubjective factors were established: a person's trust/distrust of himself, other people, the world around him, value profile and personality traits. Predictors of technophobia and technophilia have been identified in men and women of adolescent and middle age (the second period of adulthood). Conclusion. Technophilia and technophobia, which are psychological phenomena of different content, are interrelated with the level of confidence of a person in himself/herself, the world around him/her and other people, value profile and personality traits, and the content of this relationship is revealed taking into account gender and age characteristics.

attitude to new technologiestechnophobiatechnophiliaintrasubjective factorstrustvalue profilepersonality traits

Список литературы

Akimova, A.Yu. (2020), Doverie i nedoverie cheloveka tekhnike: Sotsialno-psikhologicheskiy podkhod [Human trust and distrust of technology: A socio-psychological approach], in Oboznov, A.A. (ed.), Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Alekseeva, O.S. (2022), “Dispositional personality traits of the millennial generation”, New Psychological Research, 2 (2), 103-118. DOI:10.51217/ npsyresearch_2022_02_02_06. (In Russian).

Alekseeva, O.S. and Rzhanova, I.E. (2019), “Values and their connection with basic personality traits”, Psychological research, 12, 63, 1-11. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/233/168 (Accessed 28 March 2024). (In Russian).

Kochneva, E.M. and Nikitina, A.A. (2019), “Gender characteristics of job satisfaction in early and middle adulthood”, The world of science. Pedagogy and psychology, 7, 3, 1-9. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/44PSMN319.pdf (Accessed 4 April 2024). (In Russian).

Lebedeva, N.M., Bushina, E.V. and Shmidt, P. (2020), “Individual, personal, and contextual predictors of organizational creativity in Russia”, Organizational psychology, 10(4), 63-87. (In Russian).

Nestik, T.A. (2020), “Attitude to new technologies and value orientations of Russians”, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and labor psychology, 5, 4, 54-82. DOI: 10.38098/ipran.opwp.2020.17.4.003. (In Russian).

Nestik, T.A. and Zhuravlev, A.L. (2018), Psikhologiya globalnyh riskov [Psychology of global risks], Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Nestik, T.A. and Zhuravlev, A.L. (2020), Chelovek v usloviyah globalnyh riskov: Sotsialno-psikhologicheskiy analiz [Man in the conditions of global risks: socio-psychological analysis]. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. DOI: 10.38098/soc.2020.88.75.001.

Soldatova, G.U., Nestik, T.A., Rasskazova, E.I. and Dorokhov, E.A. (2021), “Psychodiagnostics of technophobia and technophilia: development and approbation of a questionnaire on attitudes to technology for adolescents and parents”, Social psychology and society, 12, 4, 170-188. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120410. (In Russian).

Rzhanova, I.E. and Alekseeva, O.S. (2021), “Values of men and women in different generations”, New psychological research, 1, 4, 91-108. DOI: 10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_04_05. (In Russian).

Saenko, A.Y. (2024), “The relationship of value orientations and satisfaction of safety needs with attitude towards robots: an intergenerational aspect”, Theoretical and experimental psychology, 17 (1), 49-69. DOI: 10.11621/TEP-24-03/ (In Russian).

Soldatova, G.U. and Nestik, T.A. (2016), “Attitude to the Internet among Internet users: technophobes and technophiles”, Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Psychological Sciences, 1, 54-61. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7235-2016-1-54-61. (In Russian).

Hkromov, A.B. (2000), Pyatifaktorny oprosnik lichnosti: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [The five-factor personality questionnaire: An educational and methodological guide], Izdatel'stvo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Kurgan, Russia.

Daruwala, N. (2024), “A cross-cultural investigation on Smart Home Technology: the roles of digital competence, technophobia, technophilia, and trust”, Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 42(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2024.42.1.9-24. (In UK).

Hulse, L.M., Xie, H. and Galea, E.R. (2018), “Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age”, Safety Science, 102, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.00. (In UK).

Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M. and Murdvee, M. (2017), “Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire”, Technology in Society, 51, 183-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.007. (In UK).

Osiceanu, M.-E. (2015), “Psychological Implications of Modern Technologies: «Technofobia» versus «Technophilia»”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229. (In UK).

Pﬂugfelder, E.H. (2018), “Autonomous Vehicles and Gender: A Commentary”, Transfers, 8, 104-111. DOI: 10.3167/TRANS.2018.080108. (In UK).

Purc, E. and Laguna, M. (2019), “Personal values and innovative behavior of employees”, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865. (In UK).

Rode, J.A. and Poole, E.S. (2018), “Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping”. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT (GenderIT '18), Association for Computing Machinery. New York, USA. 79-90. DOI: 10.1145/3196839.3196845. (In UK).