2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-4-0-63623PSYCHOLOGY<strong>Model of digital personality in the post-non-classical paradigm</strong><strong>Model of digital personality in the post-non-classical paradigm</strong>ZhikharevaLiliya VladimirovnaZhikharevaLiliya Vladimirovnaliliya_80@list.ruLuchinkinaAngelica IlyinichnaLuchinkinaAngelica Ilyinichnaaluch@ya.ruLuchinkinaIrina SergeevnaLuchinkinaIrina Sergeevnamiss_luchinkina@mail.ruYudeevaTatyana VasilievnaYudeevaTatyana Vasilievnadjoma@list.ruFevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical UniversityCrimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov202410400

Introduction. The impact of globalization and digitalization on personality formation in the post-non-classical paradigm is characterized by multiplicity and uncertainty. The analysis of scientific literature allows us to identify the key criteria of post-non-classical approaches to personality formation: simulation nature, information content and ability to multitask. The purpose. The aim of the work is to study the features of personality formation in the context of digital space and globalization, as well as to develop a logical model of personality based on the postulates of the post-non-classical paradigm. Methodology and methods. The study used the modeling method. Based on the postulates of the post-non-classical paradigm, the presented &ldquo;Logical Model of Personality&rdquo; is based on the network principle of systematicity. Results. The model includes six levels of mental organization: individual characteristics, environmental level, social situation of life, psychological model of personal construct, activity as a mechanism for realizing personal potentials and integrative level. Digital personality is considered as an extension of the real personality in the digital environment and as an independent digital model developed by artificial intelligence. Various levels of digital personality include identification data, communication skills, information content, emotional reactions and behavioral models. Digital personality is formed through the processes of selective self-presentation, interaction, adaptation to new conditions and integration of the virtual and real &ldquo;I&rdquo;. Conclusion. The concepts of digital personality, digital identity and virtual personality can be considered as synonymous. Digital personality is a superstructure of a real personality immersed in digital space or a self-developing product created by artificial intelligence that imitates the behavior of a real personality in digital space. It is possible to distinguish identification, information-content, emotional-evaluative, behavioral levels of digital personality. Mechanisms for the formation of digital personality can be selective presentation, interactivity, adaptation, integration.

Introduction. The impact of globalization and digitalization on personality formation in the post-non-classical paradigm is characterized by multiplicity and uncertainty. The analysis of scientific literature allows us to identify the key criteria of post-non-classical approaches to personality formation: simulation nature, information content and ability to multitask. The purpose. The aim of the work is to study the features of personality formation in the context of digital space and globalization, as well as to develop a logical model of personality based on the postulates of the post-non-classical paradigm. Methodology and methods. The study used the modeling method. Based on the postulates of the post-non-classical paradigm, the presented &ldquo;Logical Model of Personality&rdquo; is based on the network principle of systematicity. Results. The model includes six levels of mental organization: individual characteristics, environmental level, social situation of life, psychological model of personal construct, activity as a mechanism for realizing personal potentials and integrative level. Digital personality is considered as an extension of the real personality in the digital environment and as an independent digital model developed by artificial intelligence. Various levels of digital personality include identification data, communication skills, information content, emotional reactions and behavioral models. Digital personality is formed through the processes of selective self-presentation, interaction, adaptation to new conditions and integration of the virtual and real &ldquo;I&rdquo;. Conclusion. The concepts of digital personality, digital identity and virtual personality can be considered as synonymous. Digital personality is a superstructure of a real personality immersed in digital space or a self-developing product created by artificial intelligence that imitates the behavior of a real personality in digital space. It is possible to distinguish identification, information-content, emotional-evaluative, behavioral levels of digital personality. Mechanisms for the formation of digital personality can be selective presentation, interactivity, adaptation, integration.

digitalizationdigital identitymodelingpost-non-classical paradigmartificial intelligencedigitalizationdigital identitymodelingpost-non-classical paradigmartificial intelligenceСписок литературыAristarkhova, I.L. and Tekl, S. (1995), &ldquo;Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet&rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, (3-4), 347. (In Russian).Baeva L.V. (2013) &ldquo;Electronic culture: experience of philosophical analysis&rdquo;, Voprosy filosofii, 5, 75-83. (In Russian).Bandura, A. and Uolters, R. (2000), Podrostkovaya agressiya: Izuchenie vliyaniya vospitaniya i semeinyh otnosheniy, [Adolescent Aggressio: Exploring the Impact of Parenting and Family relationships], EKSMO Press, Moscow, Russia.Beitson, G. (2005), Shagi v napravlenii ekologii raz uma: izbrannye stati po psihiatrii, [Steps towards the ecology of the mind: selected articles on psychiatry], Combook, Moscow, Russia.Belinskaya, E.P. and Gavrichenko, O.V. (2018), &ldquo;Self-presentation in virtual space: phenomenology and patterns&rdquo;, Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 11(60), 12-32. DOI: 0.54359/ps.v11i60.269/. (In Russian).Bodriyar, Z. (2015), Simulyakry i simulyatsii, [Simulacra and simulations], POSTUM Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976), Dva mira detstva. Deti v SSHA i SSSR, [Two worlds of childhood. Children in the USA and the USSR], Moscow, Russia.Dilts, R. (1997), Izmenenie ubezhdeniy s pomoshchyu NLP, [Changing beliefs with NLP], Independent firm &ldquo;Klass&rdquo;, Moscow, Russia.Zhihareva, L.V., Luchinkina, I.S., Grebenyuk, A.A. and Luchinkina, A.I. (2022), &ldquo;Independent firm Klass Cyberbullying as a form of deviant personality behavior in the Internet space&rdquo;, Nauchny rezultat. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya., 4. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8971-2022-8-4-0-9. (In Russian).Zekeryaev, R.I. (2019), &ldquo;Psychological features of the user&#39;s virtual personality and its types&rdquo;, Sovremennaya nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Poznanie, 1(88), 31-37. (In Russian).Kanakova, A.E. (2024), &ldquo;Does a person have a digital identity, or does a person have a digital identity?&rdquo;, Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 8(1), 126-135. DOI: 10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-126-135. (In Russian).Luchinkina, A.I., Andreev, A.S. and Korshak, A.A. (2024), &ldquo;Integral individuality in the context of the post-non-classical paradigm: the psychodynamic aspect&rdquo;, Chelovecheskiy kapital, 1(181), 174-180. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2024.01.18. (In Russian).Luchinkina, A.I., Zhikhareva, L.V. and Andreev, A.S. (2022), &ldquo;Gender characteristics of media consumption of modern youth&rdquo;, Gumanitarnye nauki, 1(57), 114-121. (In Russian).Luchinkina, A.I., Zhikhareva, L.V., Luchinkina, I.S., Grebenyuk, A.A., Yudeeva T.V., Zekeryaev R.I. and Davidyuk N.M. (2022), &ldquo;Features of online aggression of Internet-active youth&rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie nauki, 3, 21-35. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7235-2022-3-21-35. (In Russian).Luchinkina, A.I., Luchinkina, I.S., Sichkoriz, N.V. and Umerova, A.I.K. (2021), &ldquo;Emotional response of a person to a change in reality&rdquo;, Chelovecheskiy kapital, 7(151), 150-158. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2021.07.18. (In Russian).Luchinkina, A.I. and Rudenko, E.S. (2022), &ldquo;Features of the communicative behavior of the personality of adolescents with different levels of suicidal risks when changing reality&rdquo;, Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 19(2). 118-128. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2022.2.9. (In Russian).Luchinkina, I.S. (2022), &ldquo;Psychological features of digital personality behavior&rdquo;, Vestnik YUUrGGPU, 6 (172). DOI:10.25588/1575.2022.74.53.015. (In Russian).Pogorelov, D.N. and Soldatova, E.L. (2018), &ldquo;The phenomenon of virtual identity: the current state of the problem&rdquo;, Obrazovanie i nauka, 5(20). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-5-105-124. (In Russian).Palkova, A.V. (2012), &ldquo;&ldquo;Multimedium&rdquo; The Internet in the context of the development of mass media and communication&rdquo;, Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 10(2), 110-118. (In Russian).Pashkov, A.G. (2016), &ldquo;Personality in the conditions of information civilization: where electronic &ldquo;gadgets&rdquo; lead a person&rdquo;, Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika, 1(22), 7-10. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-5(169)-45-51. (In Russian).Rasina, E.O. (2021), &ldquo;Psychological characteristics of the virtual personality image&rdquo;, Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii: mezhdunarodny nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 6 (59). (In Russian).Rassel, B. (2006), &ldquo;Mathematical logic based on type theory&rdquo;, Logika, ontologiya, yazyk, 16-62. (In Russian).Rimskiy, V. (2009), &ldquo;The impact of the Internet on social activity, formation and development&rdquo;, Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya, 1(99), 86-96. (In Russian).Senchenko, N.A. (2016), &ldquo;Virtual personality in the socio-cultural Internet space&rdquo;, Kultura i tsivilizatsiya, 1, 128-140. (In Russian).Sokolova, D.M. (2013), &ldquo;The main trends of social virtualization in the information age&rdquo;, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2, 61-65. (In Russian).Soldatkina, O.L. (2019), &ldquo;Digital law: features of the digital environment and subjects&rdquo;, Gosudarstvo i pravo, 12, 113-123. DOI: 10.36511/2078-5356-2021-2-131-135. (In Russian).Soldatova, G.U. (2018), &ldquo;Digital Socialization in the Cultural and Historical paradigm: a changing child in a changing world&rdquo;, Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 3(9), 71-80. DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090308. (In Russian).Solovyeva, L.N. (2020), &ldquo;Digital identity as a phenomenon of information modernity&rdquo;, Society: philosophy, history, culture, 12(80). (In Russian).Flenina, T.A. (2015), &ldquo;Network identity in the self-consciousness of Russian youth&rdquo;, Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertsena, 178, 76-79. (In Russian).Chiksentmikhai, M. (2013), Evolyutsiya lichnosti, [The evolution of personality], Alpina is non-fiction, Moscow, Russia.Chudova, N.V. (2002), &ldquo;Features of the image of the &ldquo;I&rdquo; of the &ldquo;Internet inhabitant&rdquo;&rdquo;, Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 1(23), 113-118. (In Russian).Shneider, L.B. and Symanyuk, V.V. (2017), &ldquo;The user in the information environment: digital identity today&rdquo;, Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 10&nbsp;(52), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i52.392. (In Russian).Yudeeva, T.V. (2022), &ldquo;Motivation of destructive communicative behavior of teenagers in social networks&rdquo;, Mezhdunarodny nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal, 2(116), 178-182. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2022.116.2.066. (In Russian).Robert, P., John C.D., Gerald E.M. and Peter M. (2008), Behavioral Genetics, Worth Publishers, New York. (In USA).Anton, M.S., Denis, A.Z., Artyom, E.P. and Tatiana, A.B. (2021), &ldquo;Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Post-non-classical Scientific Rationality&rdquo;, IFAC-Papers OnLine, 54 (13). DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.480. (In Austria).Gabarnet, A., Feixas, G. and Montesano, A. (2023), &ldquo;What Is the Psychological Role of the Virtual Self in Online Worlds? A Scoping Review&rdquo;, Research Gate, 7, 109. DOI: 10.3390/mti7120109. (In Germany).H&auml;llgren, C. and Bj&ouml;rk, A. (2023), &ldquo;Young people&#39;s identities in digital worlds&rdquo;, International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 1(40), 49-61. (In UK).Huang, J. and Kumar, S., Hu, C. (2021), &ldquo;A Literature Review of Online Identity Reconstruction. Front, Psychol. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696552. (In Switzerland).McAdams, D.P. (1988), &ldquo;Biography, narrative, and lives: An introduction&rdquo;, Psychobiography and life narratives: A special issue of the Journal of Personality, 1-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00460.x. (In USA).Suler, J. (2004), &ldquo;The Online Disinhibition Effect&rdquo;, Pubmed, 7, 321. (In USA).Suler, J. (2015), &ldquo;Psychology of the Digital Age Humans Become Electric. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1089/1094931041291295. (In UK).Vopson, M.M. (2019), &ldquo;The mass-energy-information equivalence principle&rdquo;, AIP Advances, 9(9). DOI: 10.1063/1.5123794. (In USA).Turkle, S. (2011), Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other, Basic Books, New York, USA.Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B. (1997), &ldquo;Principia mathematica&rdquo;, Cambridge. (In UK).