<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-4-0-8</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3625</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Psychodiagnostic methods and a typology of representative perception systems in students&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Psychodiagnostic methods and a typology of representative perception systems in students&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ryzhkova</surname><given-names>Maria Igorevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ryzhkova</surname><given-names>Maria Igorevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>mariryzhk@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Rychkova</surname><given-names>Lidia Sergeevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rychkova</surname><given-names>Lidia Sergeevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>South Ural State University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2024/4/Рыжкова_Рычкова.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. The problem of increasing the effectiveness of learning in universities remains relevant. The quality of learning can be directly related to the ability to perceive information in the educational environment. The inconsistency between learning styles and the leading channel of perception for generation Z students can decrease the effectiveness of material assimilation. In this regard, the role of teachers of higher education and their ability to take into account the variety of styles of perception of information by students is becoming an increasingly significant role. This knowledge will more actively and productively integrate students in the educational process. The purpose of the study is to choose psychodiagnostic tools to investigate the representative systems of perception among modern students and determine the types of modalities of perception that are most preferred by them. Materials and methods. The sample comprised 189 students of the psychological profile of South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk). The following methods were used: The Leading Representative System (Stolyarenko&amp;nbsp;L.D.); The Leading Perception Modality Test (Navalikhina A.I.); The Representational System Bias Test (Lewis V., Pucelik F.); The VARK Questionnaire (Fleming N.); a package of mathematical and statistical programs Microsoft Excel. Results. A complex of psychodiagnostic techniques was proposed for researching the type of representative system of perception of students, which can be recommended as the basic for solving similar goals and objectives to a wide range of psychologists-researchers. The leading representative systems of the perception of the information of modern students were identified: kinesthetic (in the range from 37% to 52%), visual (14-29%), digital (12-34%), audio (10-28%) system. It was revealed that students of the psychological profile use both unimodal and multimodal strategies. Conclusion. Diagnosis of the leading modality of students is a significant tool in the hands of a university teacher to achieve higher learning outcomes. The alignment of the pedagogical approach with the student&amp;#39;s perceptual mode will facilitate more efficacious training and the deployment of optimal strategies.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The problem of increasing the effectiveness of learning in universities remains relevant. The quality of learning can be directly related to the ability to perceive information in the educational environment. The inconsistency between learning styles and the leading channel of perception for generation Z students can decrease the effectiveness of material assimilation. In this regard, the role of teachers of higher education and their ability to take into account the variety of styles of perception of information by students is becoming an increasingly significant role. This knowledge will more actively and productively integrate students in the educational process. The purpose of the study is to choose psychodiagnostic tools to investigate the representative systems of perception among modern students and determine the types of modalities of perception that are most preferred by them. Materials and methods. The sample comprised 189 students of the psychological profile of South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk). The following methods were used: The Leading Representative System (Stolyarenko&amp;nbsp;L.D.); The Leading Perception Modality Test (Navalikhina A.I.); The Representational System Bias Test (Lewis V., Pucelik F.); The VARK Questionnaire (Fleming N.); a package of mathematical and statistical programs Microsoft Excel. Results. A complex of psychodiagnostic techniques was proposed for researching the type of representative system of perception of students, which can be recommended as the basic for solving similar goals and objectives to a wide range of psychologists-researchers. The leading representative systems of the perception of the information of modern students were identified: kinesthetic (in the range from 37% to 52%), visual (14-29%), digital (12-34%), audio (10-28%) system. It was revealed that students of the psychological profile use both unimodal and multimodal strategies. Conclusion. Diagnosis of the leading modality of students is a significant tool in the hands of a university teacher to achieve higher learning outcomes. The alignment of the pedagogical approach with the student&amp;#39;s perceptual mode will facilitate more efficacious training and the deployment of optimal strategies.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>modality of perception</kwd><kwd>audial</kwd><kwd>visual</kwd><kwd>kinesthetic</kwd><kwd>digital</kwd><kwd>psychodiagnostics of modality of perception</kwd><kwd>representative system</kwd><kwd>students of generation Z</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>modality of perception</kwd><kwd>audial</kwd><kwd>visual</kwd><kwd>kinesthetic</kwd><kwd>digital</kwd><kwd>psychodiagnostics of modality of perception</kwd><kwd>representative system</kwd><kwd>students of generation Z</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Ananiev B.G. (2001), Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as an Object of Knowledge], Peter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Zorina, E.M. (2021), &amp;ldquo;Modern trends in the organization of the educational process at the university with the use of pedagogical support&amp;rdquo;, Man and Education. 2&amp;nbsp;(67), 100-106. (In Russia).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Navalikhina, A.I. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Leading perception modality test for learning purposes&amp;rdquo;, PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin, 3, 192-204. (In Russia).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Zenkina, V.G., Sakhonenko, V.A., Artyushenko, B.G. and Solodkova, O.A. (2016), &amp;ldquo;A representative system of medical students and the success of learning in the university&amp;rdquo;, Modern High Technologies, 1, 111-114. (In Russia).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kholodnaya, M.A. (2004), Kognitivnyye stili: O prirode individualnogo uma [Cognitive Styles. About the nature of the individual mind], Peter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Chuprikova, N.I. (1997), Psikhologiya umstvennogo razvitiya: printsip differentsiatsii [Psychology of mental development: the principle of differentiation], Stoletiye, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Bruner, J. (1977), Psychology of Cognition. Progress, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Coffield, F., Moseley D., Hall E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004), Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. Learn Skills Res Centre. London, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Fleming, N.D. (1995), &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m different; not dumb. Modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. In: Research and Development in Higher Education, edited by Zelmer A.&amp;rdquo; Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia, 1995, 18, 308-313. (In New Zealand).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Grinder, J. and Bandler, R. (1976), The Structure of Magic (in 2 volumes). Science and Behavior Books, California, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>James, W. and Gardner, D. (1995), &amp;ldquo;Learning styles: implications for distance learning&amp;rdquo;, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 67, 19-32. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Kusumawarti, E., Subiyantoro, S. and Rukayah (2020), &amp;ldquo;The Effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Model toward Writing Narrative: Linguistic Intelligence Perspective&amp;rdquo;. International Journal of Instruction, 13 (4), 677-694. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2020.13442a. (In Switzerland).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Miller, P. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Learning styles: the multimedia of the mind&amp;rdquo;. Educational Resource Information Center. 451. 1-10. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Muslimin, M. and Firmansyah F. (2022), &amp;ldquo;The use of visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning to increase student learning outcomes Inornatus&amp;rdquo;. Biology Education Journal, 2 (2), 85-93. DOI: 10.30862/inornatus.v2i2.343. (In UK).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Ramadian, O.D., Cahyono, B.Y. and Suryati, N. (2019), &amp;ldquo;The implementation of visual, Auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning model in improving students&amp;rsquo; achievementin writing descriptive texts&amp;rdquo;. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2 (3), 142-149. DOI: 10.12928/eltej.v2i3.946. (In Indonesia).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Sousa, D.A. (2006), How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. California, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Tomić, D., Rastovski, D. and Ćurić, M. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Exploring the VARK model: a review of the validity and reliability of the questionnaire and its relationship to learning outcomes&amp;rdquo;, Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific Symposium Region, Entrepreneurship, Development, Osijek, Croatia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Vorobiyenko, P., Vasylenko, O. and Chepelyuk N. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Psychological and pedagogical bases for the creation of an automated system for the diagnosis of levels of perception channels development (perception.guide)&amp;rdquo;, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 62 (6), 225-238. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v62i6.1923. (In Ukraine).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Wehrwein, E.A., Lujan H.L. and DiCarlo, S.E. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>students&amp;rdquo;, Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 153-157. DOI:10.1152/advan.00060.2006. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Yadrischenskaya, T. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Analysis of Perceptual-Mnemonic Characteristics of Students in Modern Conditions of Digitalization of Society&amp;rdquo;. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020), Khabarovsk, Russia. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200723.081.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>