2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2025-11-1-0-93698PSYCHOLOGY<strong>Innovative receptivity of the teacher: development and validation of a questionnaire</strong><br /> &nbsp;<strong>Innovative receptivity of the teacher: development and validation of a questionnaire</strong><br /> &nbsp;AvakyanInna BorisovnaAvakyanInna Borisovnaavakjaninna@ramler.ruGeneral of the Army S.M. Shtemenko Krasnodar Higher Military School202511100

Introduction. Effective psychological and pedagogical support of a teacher&#39;s professional activity is necessary to ensure the quality and effectiveness of pedagogical functions in the context of modernisation of the educational system. The purpose of the study is to develop, validate and standardize an original methodology for assessing the innovative susceptibility of a teacher. Materials and methods. The study, aimed at identifying the psychometric characteristics of the new methodology, involved 482 people aged 21 to 65 years. Of these, 262 were women (53.8%), 220 were men (46.2) (sample 1); to verify convergent validity, 482 respondents took part in the study (sample 2); to assess test-retest reliability, 144 people took part (sample 3). The study used the methods of mathematical statistics: nonparametric criterion of rank correlation rs &ndash;Spearman to identify the convergent validity of the questionnaire, standardized effect size of Cohen&#39;s d to identify statistically significant differences between the levels of innovative susceptibility of the teacher by gender, the magnitude of the statistical effect of the indicators of innovative susceptibility of the teacher for the level characteristic. Research results. The developed methodology includes 7 scales and 36 questions: stimulating factor, personal and pedagogical values, personal and professional qualities, typological characteristics of innovative susceptibility, pedagogical methods, interactive teaching methods, the result of innovative susceptibility, allowing to assess the level of innovative susceptibility on a five-point scale based on the presented indicators. In the process of developing a hypothetical construct of the methodology, a theoretical analysis of scientific approaches to the subject of the study was carried out, the content of the phenomenon of innovative susceptibility of the teacher was revealed. The article presents the text of the methodology, keys, interpretation of the results, data on the standardization of the sample, on the basis of which the study was designed. Conclusion. The obtained results of the study confirm the high level of reliability, accuracy, validity of the questionnaire, which allows us to present it as a reasonable and suitable psychodiagnostic tool for studying the psychological characteristics and the level of manifestation of innovative susceptibility of teachers of educational institutions in the process of psychological and pedagogical support of pedagogical activity.

Introduction. Effective psychological and pedagogical support of a teacher&#39;s professional activity is necessary to ensure the quality and effectiveness of pedagogical functions in the context of modernisation of the educational system. The purpose of the study is to develop, validate and standardize an original methodology for assessing the innovative susceptibility of a teacher. Materials and methods. The study, aimed at identifying the psychometric characteristics of the new methodology, involved 482 people aged 21 to 65 years. Of these, 262 were women (53.8%), 220 were men (46.2) (sample 1); to verify convergent validity, 482 respondents took part in the study (sample 2); to assess test-retest reliability, 144 people took part (sample 3). The study used the methods of mathematical statistics: nonparametric criterion of rank correlation rs &ndash;Spearman to identify the convergent validity of the questionnaire, standardized effect size of Cohen&#39;s d to identify statistically significant differences between the levels of innovative susceptibility of the teacher by gender, the magnitude of the statistical effect of the indicators of innovative susceptibility of the teacher for the level characteristic. Research results. The developed methodology includes 7 scales and 36 questions: stimulating factor, personal and pedagogical values, personal and professional qualities, typological characteristics of innovative susceptibility, pedagogical methods, interactive teaching methods, the result of innovative susceptibility, allowing to assess the level of innovative susceptibility on a five-point scale based on the presented indicators. In the process of developing a hypothetical construct of the methodology, a theoretical analysis of scientific approaches to the subject of the study was carried out, the content of the phenomenon of innovative susceptibility of the teacher was revealed. The article presents the text of the methodology, keys, interpretation of the results, data on the standardization of the sample, on the basis of which the study was designed. Conclusion. The obtained results of the study confirm the high level of reliability, accuracy, validity of the questionnaire, which allows us to present it as a reasonable and suitable psychodiagnostic tool for studying the psychological characteristics and the level of manifestation of innovative susceptibility of teachers of educational institutions in the process of psychological and pedagogical support of pedagogical activity.

innovative receptivityteacherreliabilityconvergencevaliditystandardizationinnovative receptivityteacherreliabilityconvergencevaliditystandardization

The author would like to thank the faculty members of the universities who participated in the study, and also expresses her gratitude to the reviewers for the qualitative and detailed analysis of the content of the article.

Список литературыAvakyan, I.B. (2019), &ldquo;Factor analysis of the development of innovative readiness of university teachers&rdquo;, Science for Education Today, 1, 43-56. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1901.03. (In Russian).Avakyan, I.B. (2018), &ldquo;On the issue of the relationship between innovative readiness of teachers and the socio-psychological climate of universities&rdquo;, Obrazovanie i nauka, 20(4), 114-131. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-4-114-131. (In Russian).Avakyan, I.B. (2024), &ldquo;Factor analysis of pedagogical conservatism&rdquo;, Tsifra. Psikhologiya, 4(5), 1-11. DOI: 10.60797/PSY.2024.5.6. (In Russian).Belolutskaya, A.K., Kristofik, I.S. and Mkrtchyan, V.A. (2022), &ldquo;Features of teachers&#39; reflection: connection with personal and professional value orientations, Obrazovanie i nauka, 24(7), 160-190. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-160-190. (In Russian).Koroleva N.N., Shingaev S.M. and Esaulova E.A. (2023), &ldquo;Value-motivational predictors of job satisfaction of teachers of general education organizations&rdquo;, Psikhologiya. Seriya: Poznanie, 8, 65-71. DOI: 10.37882/2500-3682.2023.08.10. (In Russian).Krushelnitskaya O.I. and Tretyakova A.N. (2023), &ldquo;The Problem of Methods for Studying the Value-Motivational Sphere of an Individual in the Era of Change&rdquo;, Gumanitarnye nauk, 13(3), 44-51. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-3-44-51. (In Russian).Lazarenko I.R., Matveeva N.A., Kolesova S.V. and Kulikova L.G. and Loginova O.A. (2022), Gotovnost pedagogov obrazovatelnykh organizatsiy srednego obshchego obrazovaniya k innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [Readiness of Teachers of Secondary General Education Organizations for Innovative Activities],: AltGPU. Barnaul, Russia.Panteleeva, V.V., Knysheva, T.P. (2016), &ldquo;Questionnaire of personnel innovation readiness&rdquo;, Akmeologiya, 3, 81-86. (In Russian).Fetiskin, N.P., Kozlov, V.V., Manuilov, G.M. (2002), Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Social and psychological diagnostics of personality and small group development], Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii, Moscow, Russia.Shulga, I.I. (2022), &ldquo;Pedagogical culture: value-semantic context of digital transformation of education&rdquo;, Vestnik pedagogicheskikh innovatsii, 1(65), 5-12. (In Russian).Ershtein L.B. (2021), &ldquo;Excessive workload of university teachers as a factor in the destruction of higher education in Russia, Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsialno-ehkonomicheskie nauki&rdquo;, 2, 75-87. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.2.6. (In Russian).Costello, R. (2017), &ldquo;Gaming innovations in higher education: Emerging research and opportunities&rdquo;, 1-178. DOI: 10.4018 / 978-1-5225-2981-1.de la Fuente, J., Kauffman, D., D&iacute;az-Orueta, U. and Kauffman, Y. (2018), &ldquo;Adapting the Research Development and Innovation (RD &amp; I) Value Chain in Psychology to Educational Psychology Area&rdquo;, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01188.Solodikhina, M.V. and Solodikhina, A.A. (2019), &ldquo;Development of critical thinking of master&rsquo;s degree students using stem cases&rdquo;, Obrazovanie i Nauka, 21(3), 125&ndash;153. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-3-125-153. (In Russian).Stupnisky, R.H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B. and Guay, F. (2018), &ldquo;Faculty members&rsquo; motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types&rdquo;, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 15-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004.