2313-8971Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education2313-897110.18413/2313-8971-2025-11-3-0-83872PSYCHOLOGY<strong>Assessment of the effectiveness of psychological services in the education system in the Russian Federation</strong><br /> &nbsp;<strong>Assessment of the effectiveness of psychological services in the education system in the Russian Federation</strong><br /> &nbsp;UlyaninaOlga AlexandrovnaUlyaninaOlga Alexandrovnaulyaninaoa@mgppu.ruYurchukOlga LeonidovnaYurchukOlga Leonidovnayurchukol@mgppu.ruTukfeevaYulia VladimirovnaTukfeevaYulia Vladimirovnaulyaninaoa@mgppu.ruTrofimovaAnastasia PavlovnaTrofimovaAnastasia Pavlovnaulyaninaoa@mgppu.ruRozvezevaAnastasia KirillovnaRozvezevaAnastasia Kirillovnasharapovaak@mgppu.ruMoscow State University of Psychology and Education202511300

Introduction. A psychological service can be developed through an assessment of deficits and resources, which can be analysed by monitoring its effectiveness. Analysing and discussing the results of this monitoring makes it possible to make the necessary management decisions. The purpose of monitoring the effectiveness of the psychological service in the education system was to assess its current state in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Мethodology and methods. Criteria, parameters and indicators were previously developed to determine the level of effectiveness of the psychological service. The analysis was conducted on the basis of two criteria: the quality and accessibility of psychological and pedagogical assistance to participants in educational relations. Based on the selected criteria, special forms of questionnaires have been developed, which are an automated tool. Results. According to the monitoring results, the average level of effectiveness of psychological services prevails in most regions. Educational organizations provide psychological and pedagogical assistance to participants in educational relations, but there remains an urgent need for staffing them with full-time educational psychologists. There is also a discrepancy between the recommended and approved standards for the number of PPMS centers and PPMS, which complicates the provision of psychological and pedagogical assistance to the entire child population of the Russian Federation. Conclusion. The monitoring results made it possible to determine the level of effectiveness of the psychological service and identify areas for its development. Monitoring also allows the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to conduct self-diagnostics to analyze the existing risks in the development of the psychological service, resource potential and identify the main factors affecting the outcome of its activities.

Introduction. A psychological service can be developed through an assessment of deficits and resources, which can be analysed by monitoring its effectiveness. Analysing and discussing the results of this monitoring makes it possible to make the necessary management decisions. The purpose of monitoring the effectiveness of the psychological service in the education system was to assess its current state in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Мethodology and methods. Criteria, parameters and indicators were previously developed to determine the level of effectiveness of the psychological service. The analysis was conducted on the basis of two criteria: the quality and accessibility of psychological and pedagogical assistance to participants in educational relations. Based on the selected criteria, special forms of questionnaires have been developed, which are an automated tool. Results. According to the monitoring results, the average level of effectiveness of psychological services prevails in most regions. Educational organizations provide psychological and pedagogical assistance to participants in educational relations, but there remains an urgent need for staffing them with full-time educational psychologists. There is also a discrepancy between the recommended and approved standards for the number of PPMS centers and PPMS, which complicates the provision of psychological and pedagogical assistance to the entire child population of the Russian Federation. Conclusion. The monitoring results made it possible to determine the level of effectiveness of the psychological service and identify areas for its development. Monitoring also allows the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to conduct self-diagnostics to analyze the existing risks in the development of the psychological service, resource potential and identify the main factors affecting the outcome of its activities.

psychological serviceemergency and crisis psychological assistancemonitoringstaffing qualityaccessibilityshortagesteacher psychologistpsychological serviceemergency and crisis psychological assistancemonitoringstaffing qualityaccessibilityshortagesteacher psychologistСписок литературыDubrovina, I.V. (2024), &ldquo;Psychological service on the way of its development&rdquo;, Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya, 21(1), 14-26. DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2024210101. (In Russian).Dubrovina, I.V. (2022), &ldquo;Background of the development of the school psychological service (on the occasion of the 110th anniversary of the Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences&rdquo;, Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya, 19(1), 18-32. DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2022190102. (In Russian).Tukfeeva, J.V., Knysheva, T.P., Trofimova, A.P., Sharapova, A.K. and Kurbanova, V.V. (2025), &ldquo;Staffing of psychological and pedagogical support in the system of general education and secondary vocational education&rdquo;, Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya, 17(1), 81-99. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2025170106. (In Russian).Ulyanina, O.A., Tukfeeva, J.V., Semenova, K.G. and Trofimova, A.P. (2025), &ldquo;Criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of psychological services in the system of general education and secondary vocational education&rdquo;, Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya, 2025, 22(1), 33-49. DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2025220104 (In Russian)Molozhavenko, A.V. (2020), &ldquo;Supervision in the interaction of a mentor with a young teacher-psychologist as a technology for the effective implementation of generalized work functions of a professional standard&rdquo;, Izvestiya VGPU, 2(145), 20-28. (In Russian).Ulyanina, O.A., Tukfeeva, J.V., Semenova, K.G. and Trofimova, A.P. (2025), &ldquo;Features of professional training of teachers-psychologists and social educators in Russia&rdquo;, Innovatsionnaya nauchnaya sovremennaya akademicheskaya issledovatelskaya traektoriya (INSAJT), 1(21), 30-40. DOI 10.17853/2686-8970-2025-1-30-40. (In Russian).Rubtsov, V.V., Zabrodin, J.M. and Leonova, O.I. (2018), &ldquo;Approbation and application of the professional standard &ldquo;Teacher-psychologist (psychologist in the field of education)&rdquo;: results of the regional experience&rdquo;, Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 23(1), 8292. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230107. (In Russian).Rubtsov, V.V. and Leonova, O.I. (2024), &ldquo;Psychological Education Service in the Russian Federation today: unresolved problems and main directions of development: a report presented at the All-Russian Congress of Psychological Services in the Education System of the Russian Federation&rdquo;, Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya, 21(1), 5-13. (In Russian).Savinkov, S.N. (2025), Psikhologicheskaya sluzhba v obrazovanii: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Psychological service in education: a textbook for universities], Izdatelstvo Yurait, Moscow, Russia.Ulyanina, O.A., Ermolaeva, A.V., Volkov, D.S., Komolova, O.S. and Sokolova, E.E. (2024), &ldquo;The system of providing emergency and crisis psychological assistance to participants in educational relations: the experience of specialists from the Federal Coordination Center for Psychological Services in the Education System of the Russian Federation&rdquo;, Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya. T. 21. № 4. 140-151. DOI: 10.17759/bppe.2024210413. (In Russian).Burns, M.K. (2011), &ldquo;School Psychology Research: Combining Ecological Theory and Prevention Science&rdquo;, School Psychol, 40, 132-139. DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2011.12087732. (In UK).Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Barron, B. and Osher, D. (2020), &ldquo;Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development&rdquo;, Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. DOI:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 (In UK.)Fenning, P., Pearrow, M. and Politikos, N. (2023), &ldquo;NASP 2020 Professional Practice Standards: Applications and Opportunities for School-Based Consultation&rdquo;, Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 33. DOI: 10.1080/10474412.2022.2154675. (In UK).Gutkin, T.B. and Conoley, J.C. (1990), &ldquo;Reconceptualizing School Psychology from a Service Delivery Perspective: Implications for Practice, Training, and Research&rdquo;, School Psychol, 28, 203-223. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4405(90)90012-V. (In UK).Jin, L., Taresh, S. and Duraipandi, O. (2023), &ldquo;The Effectiveness of The Educational Psychology Report: an Exploratory Study Taking into Account the Perspectives of Stakeholders Across the Youth, Caregiver and Educational&rdquo;, Library Progress International, 43(2), 929-934. (In UK).M&uuml;ller, B., Hagen, A., Vannini, N. and B&uuml;ttner, G. (2021), &ldquo;Measurement of the Effects of School Psychological Services: A Scoping Review&rdquo;, Front. Psychol. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.606228. (In UK).