<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2026-12-3-0-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4284</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PEDAGOGICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Structural aspects of teaching the basics of AI as a tool&amp;nbsp;for developing the critical thinking of schoolchildren&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Structural aspects of teaching the basics of AI as a tool&amp;nbsp;for developing the critical thinking of schoolchildren&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Vinogradova</surname><given-names>Elena Valentinovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vinogradova</surname><given-names>Elena Valentinovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>gimbel08@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Selyutina</surname><given-names>Elena Александровна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Selyutina</surname><given-names>Elena</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>1729856@bsuedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Belyaeva</surname><given-names>Irina Nikolaevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Belyaeva</surname><given-names>Irina Nikolaevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ibelyaeva@bsuedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Orthodox Secondary School of Saints Methodius and Cyril</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2026/3/9._Виноградова_Селютина_Беляева.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. In the context of the rapid digitalization of modern education, it is necessary to prepare schoolchildren for effective interaction with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The formation of critical thinking is a priority task of modern pedagogy, since it ensures the ability of students to independently analyze information and make informed decisions in a digital environment. The purpose of the study is to identify the structural and content features of teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in the context of the formation of critical thinking among students. Methodology and methods. The study is based on system-activity, personality-oriented and competence-based approaches. The following theoretical methods were employed: an analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature; the systematisation of the didactic capabilities of artificial intelligence; and empirical methods, including pedagogical observation and the analysis of educational products. Experimental work was carried out at the private educational institution &amp;ldquo;The Orthodox Secondary School of Saints Methodius and Cyril, Belgorod&amp;rdquo;. Results. The identified training features include propaedeutic, conceptual, algorithmic, practical and analytical-reflexive modules. The practical significance of these results is that the identified training features can be used in the basics of artificial intelligence when creating elective courses and extracurricular activities. Particular attention is paid to forming students&amp;#39; understanding of the principles of AI systems and their capabilities and limitations. Conclusion. Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence is an effective tool for developing critical thinking and preparing schoolchildren for life in the digital economy. The identified training features contribute to students developing a systematic understanding of modern technologies and the skills needed to use them consciously.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. In the context of the rapid digitalization of modern education, it is necessary to prepare schoolchildren for effective interaction with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The formation of critical thinking is a priority task of modern pedagogy, since it ensures the ability of students to independently analyze information and make informed decisions in a digital environment. The purpose of the study is to identify the structural and content features of teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in the context of the formation of critical thinking among students. Methodology and methods. The study is based on system-activity, personality-oriented and competence-based approaches. The following theoretical methods were employed: an analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature; the systematisation of the didactic capabilities of artificial intelligence; and empirical methods, including pedagogical observation and the analysis of educational products. Experimental work was carried out at the private educational institution &amp;ldquo;The Orthodox Secondary School of Saints Methodius and Cyril, Belgorod&amp;rdquo;. Results. The identified training features include propaedeutic, conceptual, algorithmic, practical and analytical-reflexive modules. The practical significance of these results is that the identified training features can be used in the basics of artificial intelligence when creating elective courses and extracurricular activities. Particular attention is paid to forming students&amp;#39; understanding of the principles of AI systems and their capabilities and limitations. Conclusion. Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence is an effective tool for developing critical thinking and preparing schoolchildren for life in the digital economy. The identified training features contribute to students developing a systematic understanding of modern technologies and the skills needed to use them consciously.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>critical thinking</kwd><kwd>education of schoolchildren</kwd><kwd>didactic materials</kwd><kwd>algorithmic thinking</kwd><kwd>neural network technologies</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>critical thinking</kwd><kwd>education of schoolchildren</kwd><kwd>didactic materials</kwd><kwd>algorithmic thinking</kwd><kwd>neural network technologies</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>This article is dedicated to the 150th anniversary of Belgorod National Research University and its long-standing tradition of researching the psychological and pedagogical mechanisms of personality development, advanced educational practices, and the integration of science, education, and upbringing.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Andreev, V.I. (2005), Pedagogika vysshey shkoly v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obrazovaniya [Pedagogy of higher education in the context of digitalization of education: textbook], Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy, Kazan, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Asmolov, A.G., Burmenskaya, G.V. and Volodarskaya, I.A. et al. (2010), Formirovanie universalnykh uchebnykh deystviy v osnovnoy shkole: ot deystviya k mysli: posobie dlya uchitelya [Formation of universal learning activities in basic school: from action to thought: manual for teachers], Prosveshchenie, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Akhmadullina, R.M., Valiakhmetova, N.R. and Yarmakeev, I.E. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Possibilities and risks of using neural networks in education&amp;rdquo;, Philology and Culture, 2 (76), 260-271. DOI: 10.26907/2782-4756-2024-76-2-260-271. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Balunova, S.A., Pichuzhkina, D.Yu. and Timofeeva, K.O. (2024), &amp;ldquo;The use of digital technologies in the development of critical thinking&amp;rdquo;, Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 84-1, 37-40. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Bostrom, N. (2016), Iskusstvennyy intellekt: etapy, ugrozy, strategii [Artificial intelligence: stages, threats, strategies], Transl. from English by S. Filin, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Verbitsky, A.A. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Contextual learning in the competency-based approach&amp;rdquo;, Higher Education in Russia, 11, 39-46. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Gabay, T.V. (2010), Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical psychology: textbook], Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Davydov, V.V. (1996), Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of developmental learning], INTOR, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Zair-Bek, S.I. and Mushtavinskaya, I.V. (2011), Razvitie kriticheskogo myshleniya na uroke [Development of critical thinking in the classroom], Prosveshchenie, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Zimnyaya, I.A. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Key competencies &amp;ndash; a new paradigm of educational outcomes&amp;rdquo;, Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole, 2, 7-14. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Klarin, M.V. (2016), Innovatsionnye modeli obucheniya. Issledovanie mirovogo opyta [Innovative learning models. Study of global experience], Luch, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Kodzhaspirova, G.M. (2016), Pedagogika v skhemakh i tablitsakh [Pedagogy in charts and tables], Prospekt, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Lapchik, M.P., Semakin, I.G. and Khenner, E.K. (2001), Metodika prepodavaniya informatiki [Methods of teaching informatics], Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Lapchik, M.P., Ragulina, M.I., Semakin, I.G. and Khenner, E.K. (2020), Metodika obucheniya informatike [Methods of teaching informatics], 3rd ed., ed. by M.P. Lapchik, Lan&amp;#39;, Saint Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Makhmutov, M.I. (1975), Problemnoe obuchenie: osnovnye voprosy teorii [Problem-based learning: main issues of the theory], Pedagogika, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Podymova, L.S. and Slastenin, V.A. (2024), Pedagogika [Pedagogy], Yurayt Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Polat, E.S. (2010), Sovremennye pedagogicheskie i informatsionnye tekhnologii v sisteme obrazovaniya [Modern pedagogical and information technologies in the education system], Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Robert, I.V. (2014), Teoriya i metodika informatizatsii obrazovaniya (psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy i tekhnologicheskiy aspekty) [Theory and methodology of informatization of education (psychological-pedagogical and technological aspects)], BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Rubinstein, S.L. (2002), Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology], Piter, Saint Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Selevko, G.K. (1998), Sovremennye obrazovatelnye tekhnologii [Modern educational technologies], Narodnoe obrazovanie, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Slastenin, V.A., Isaev, I.F. and Shiyanov, E.N. (2013), Pedagogika [Pedagogy], Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Sofronova, N.V. and Belchusov, A.A. (2021), Teoriya i metodika obucheniya informatike [Theory and methods of teaching informatics], 2nd ed., revised and expanded, Yurayt Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Ugrinovich, N.D. (2011), Informatika i IKT. 8-11 klassy [Informatics and ICT. Grades 8-11], 2nd ed., BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Khutorskoy, A.V. (2005), Metodika lichnostno-orientirovannogo obucheniya [Methodology of personality-oriented learning], VLADOS, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Sholokhovich, V.F. (1995), Didakticheskie osnovy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy obucheniya [Didactic foundations of information learning technologies], Yekaterinburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>