<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2026-12-3-1-0</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4285</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Psycho-pedagogical conditions for the emergence&amp;nbsp;and development of primary school students&amp;#39; agency in the educational environment&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Psycho-pedagogical conditions for the emergence&amp;nbsp;and development of primary school students&amp;#39; agency in the educational environment&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Gorodova</surname><given-names>Tatyana Anatolevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gorodova</surname><given-names>Tatyana Anatolevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Belgorod80@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ovsyanikova</surname><given-names>Elena Alekseevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ovsyanikova</surname><given-names>Elena Alekseevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ovsyannikova@bsuedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Khudaeva</surname><given-names>Maya Yuryevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khudaeva</surname><given-names>Maya Yuryevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>khudaeva@bsuedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University</institution></aff><aff id="aff3"><institution>Belgorod State National Research Universit</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Education Center №1</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2026/3/10._Городова_Овсяникова_Худаева.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Introduction. The transformation of the student into a genuine agent &amp;minus; both of cognitive activity and of everyday life &amp;ndash; is viewed as the primary guiding principle of modern primary education. It is during this developmental stage that the fundamental personal mechanisms of volitional control, goal-setting, self-organization, and reflective self-awareness begin to emerge. The purpose of the study: to theoretically substantiate, develop, and experimentally verify a comprehensive set of external and internal psycho-pedagogical conditions that foster the effective development of primary school children&amp;#39;s agency. Materials and methods. The study involved 364 participants: 196 primary school students in years 1-4 (111 girls and 85 boys), eight primary school teachers and 160 parents. The experimental and control groups each comprised 50 pupils in years 3 and 4 (Center of Education №1, Belgorod). The diagnostic toolkit encompassed the Child Agency Assessment Technique (N.I. Vyunova, N.A. Zhestkova), Volitional Self-Assessment and Imaginary Situations tests (M.V. Matyukhina, S.G. Yarikova), the modified &amp;ldquo;Who Am I?&amp;rdquo; technique (M. Kuhn), Teacher Agency Questionnaire&amp;nbsp;(E.N. Volkova, I.A. Seregina), STOP Pedagogical Communication Style inventory, parental questionnaires, and teacher expert evaluation forms. Statistical data processing was executed in SPSS using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon T, Fisher&amp;#39;s &amp;phi;* transformation, and Spearman&amp;#39;s rank correlation. Results. Structural and gender-specific peculiarities of agency were identified: girls demonstrated significantly higher levels of agency towards themselves (Uemp = 3670, p&amp;le;0.01), towards others (Uemp = 3762, p&amp;le;0.01), and integrated agency (Uemp = 3639, p&amp;le;0.01). A substantial divergence between children&amp;#39;s self-assessed autonomy and teachers&amp;#39; expert assessments was documented (Temp = -12.07, p&amp;le;0.01). A 12-session developmental intervention targeting students and an educational module for teachers and parents were implemented. A postintervention assessment revealed statistically significant improvements across all agency dimensions in the experimental group (p&amp;le;0.01). Conclusions. The findings substantiate that the emergence of agency is contingent upon the synergistic unity of internal personal resources (self-worth, reflection, internal action plan) and external environmental mediation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The transformation of the student into a genuine agent &amp;minus; both of cognitive activity and of everyday life &amp;ndash; is viewed as the primary guiding principle of modern primary education. It is during this developmental stage that the fundamental personal mechanisms of volitional control, goal-setting, self-organization, and reflective self-awareness begin to emerge. The purpose of the study: to theoretically substantiate, develop, and experimentally verify a comprehensive set of external and internal psycho-pedagogical conditions that foster the effective development of primary school children&amp;#39;s agency. Materials and methods. The study involved 364 participants: 196 primary school students in years 1-4 (111 girls and 85 boys), eight primary school teachers and 160 parents. The experimental and control groups each comprised 50 pupils in years 3 and 4 (Center of Education №1, Belgorod). The diagnostic toolkit encompassed the Child Agency Assessment Technique (N.I. Vyunova, N.A. Zhestkova), Volitional Self-Assessment and Imaginary Situations tests (M.V. Matyukhina, S.G. Yarikova), the modified &amp;ldquo;Who Am I?&amp;rdquo; technique (M. Kuhn), Teacher Agency Questionnaire&amp;nbsp;(E.N. Volkova, I.A. Seregina), STOP Pedagogical Communication Style inventory, parental questionnaires, and teacher expert evaluation forms. Statistical data processing was executed in SPSS using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon T, Fisher&amp;#39;s &amp;phi;* transformation, and Spearman&amp;#39;s rank correlation. Results. Structural and gender-specific peculiarities of agency were identified: girls demonstrated significantly higher levels of agency towards themselves (Uemp = 3670, p&amp;le;0.01), towards others (Uemp = 3762, p&amp;le;0.01), and integrated agency (Uemp = 3639, p&amp;le;0.01). A substantial divergence between children&amp;#39;s self-assessed autonomy and teachers&amp;#39; expert assessments was documented (Temp = -12.07, p&amp;le;0.01). A 12-session developmental intervention targeting students and an educational module for teachers and parents were implemented. A postintervention assessment revealed statistically significant improvements across all agency dimensions in the experimental group (p&amp;le;0.01). Conclusions. The findings substantiate that the emergence of agency is contingent upon the synergistic unity of internal personal resources (self-worth, reflection, internal action plan) and external environmental mediation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>agency</kwd><kwd>primary school age</kwd><kwd>subject position</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>independence</kwd><kwd>responsibility</kwd><kwd>developmental psychological program</kwd><kwd>subject-subject interaction</kwd><kwd>educational environment</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>agency</kwd><kwd>primary school age</kwd><kwd>subject position</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>independence</kwd><kwd>responsibility</kwd><kwd>developmental psychological program</kwd><kwd>subject-subject interaction</kwd><kwd>educational environment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>This article is dedicated to the 150th anniversary of Belgorod National Research University and its long-standing tradition of researching the psychological and pedagogical mechanisms of personality development, advanced educational practices, and the integration of science, education, and upbringing.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Abulkhanova, K.A. (1999), Psikhologiya i soznaniye lichnosti (Problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya realnoy lichnosti) [Psychology and consciousness of personality (Problems of methodology, theory and research of real personality)], Moskovskiy psikhologo-sotsialnyy institut, Izdatelstvo NPO &amp;ldquo;MODEK&amp;rdquo;, Moscow, Voronezh, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Ananyev, B.G. (2001), Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as an object of cognition], Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bozhovich, L.I. (2008), Lichnost i eyo formirovaniye v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood], Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Brushlinskiy, A.V. (2003), Psikhologiya subiekta [Psychology of the subject], in Znakov, V.V. (ed.), Institut psikhologii RAN, Aleteyya, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Volkova, E.N. and Seregina, I.A. (2005), &amp;ldquo;Questionnaire for assessing the level of development of teacher&amp;#39;s subjectivity&amp;rdquo;, Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 26 (3), 84-95. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Vygotskiy, L.S. (1996), Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Educational psychology], in Davydov, V. V. (ed.), Pedagogika-Press, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Vyunova, N.I. and Zhestkova, N.A. (2009), Razvitiye subyektnosti mladshikh shkolnikov v obrazovatelnom protsesse [Development of primary school students&amp;#39; subjectivity in the educational process], VGU, Voronezh, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Davydov, V.V. (1996), Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of developmental education], INTOR, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Isayev, E.I. and Slobodchikov, V.I. (2013), Psikhologiya obrazovaniya cheloveka: Stanovleniye subyektnosti v obrazovatelnykh protsessakh [Psychology of human education: Formation of subjectivity in educational processes], Izd-vo PSTGU, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Konopkin, O.A. (1980), Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy proizvolnoy regulyatsii deyatelnosti [Psychological mechanisms of voluntary regulation of activity], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Matyukhina, M.V. and Yarikova, S.G. (2004), &amp;ldquo;Development of volitional qualities of primary school students&amp;rdquo;, Nachalnaya shkola, (4), 23-28. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Ognev, A.S. (1997), Teoreticheskiye osnovy psikhologii subyektogeneza [Theoretical foundations of the psychology of subjectogenesis], VGPU, Voronezh, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Osnitskiy, A.K. (2010), Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy samostoyatelnosti [Psychological mechanisms of independence], IG-SOTSIN, Moscow, Obninsk, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Petrovskiy, V.A. (1996), Lichnost v psikhologii: paradigma subyektnosti [Personality in psychology: paradigm of subjectivity], Feniks, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Rubinshtein, S.L. (2012), Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology], Piter,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Slobodchikov, V.I. (2005), Ocherki psikhologii obrazovaniya [Essays on the psychology of education], 2nd ed., BGPI, Birobidzhan, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Tatenko, V.A. (1996), Psikhologiya v subyektnom izmerenii [Psychology in the subject dimension], Prosvita, Kiev, Ukraine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Tsukerman, G.A. (2008), Vvedeniye v shkolnuyu zhizn: Programma adaptatsii detey k shkole [Introduction to school life: School adaptation program for children], Genezis, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Dignath, C., Buettner, G. and Langfeldt, G. (2008), &amp;ldquo;How can primary school students learn to self-regulate their learning? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training in primary education&amp;rdquo;, Educational Research Review, 3 (2), 101-129. (In UK).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Paris, S.G. and Paris, A.H. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning&amp;rdquo;, Educational Psychologist, 36 (2), 89-101. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Perry, N. E., Phillips, L. and Dowler, J. (2004), &amp;ldquo;Examining features of tasks and their potential for fostering self-regulated learning in elementary classrooms&amp;rdquo;, Educational Psychologist, 39 (4), 185201. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Reeve, J. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Why teachers adopt a controlling rather than an autonomy-supportive motivating style: Toward a social-pedagogical perspective&amp;rdquo;, Educational Psychologist, 44&amp;nbsp;(3), 159-175.&amp;nbsp;DOI: 10.1080/00461520903028990. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2017), Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (eds.) (1998), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G. and Kindermann, T. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (4), 765-781. (In USA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S. and Kovach, R. (1996), Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond IQ to mastery, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>