<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">762</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PEDAGOGICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>GOVERNANCE AND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>GOVERNANCE AND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Danyushina</surname><given-names>Yulia Vladimirovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Danyushina</surname><given-names>Yulia Vladimirovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>juliadaniushina@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2015/1/Данюшина_ЮВ.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The paper suggests establishing a separate sub-discipline on the crossroads of Applied Linguistics and Communication studies &amp;ndash; Governance and Business Linguistics &amp;ndash; a complex, interdisciplinary field for researching the use of language in governance and business, and for exploring the verbal specifics of institutional communication. The discursive approach is adopted to provide the basis for the investigation, and the multi-level critical discourse analysis is used as its key research method. &amp;ldquo;2.0&amp;rdquo; implies the specific new opportunities given for improving institutional communication efficiency by modern IT, the Internet (Web 2), new, telecommunications, social networks, multimedia. The author starts exploring the field by investigating the corporate websites and blogs of the leading US companies &amp;ndash; the paper explores the language of the corporate governance, leadership, internal and external specifics of the corporate communication. The paper argues that all companies can be classified into 4 discursive types identified by the author on the basis of the four types of social implications in their discursive rhetoric.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper suggests establishing a separate sub-discipline on the crossroads of Applied Linguistics and Communication studies &amp;ndash; Governance and Business Linguistics &amp;ndash; a complex, interdisciplinary field for researching the use of language in governance and business, and for exploring the verbal specifics of institutional communication. The discursive approach is adopted to provide the basis for the investigation, and the multi-level critical discourse analysis is used as its key research method. &amp;ldquo;2.0&amp;rdquo; implies the specific new opportunities given for improving institutional communication efficiency by modern IT, the Internet (Web 2), new, telecommunications, social networks, multimedia. The author starts exploring the field by investigating the corporate websites and blogs of the leading US companies &amp;ndash; the paper explores the language of the corporate governance, leadership, internal and external specifics of the corporate communication. The paper argues that all companies can be classified into 4 discursive types identified by the author on the basis of the four types of social implications in their discursive rhetoric.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Business</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>governance</kwd><kwd>linguistics</kwd><kwd>management</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Business</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>governance</kwd><kwd>linguistics</kwd><kwd>management</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bargiela-Chiappini F., Nickerson&amp;nbsp; C., Planken B. Business Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Danyushina Y.V. Business Discourse. Moscow: GUU, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Danyushina Y.V. Business Linguistics and Internet Communication. Moscow: GUU, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Fairclough&amp;nbsp; N. &amp;ldquo;Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities&amp;rdquo;. In &amp;laquo;Discourse and Society&amp;raquo;, 1993. 4. Pp. 133-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Fairclough N. &amp;ldquo;Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research&amp;rdquo;, in R. WODAK and M. MEYER (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 2001. Pp. 121-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Gurieva Z.I. Verbal communication in business: to create an integrative theory: Dissertation of Doctor of Philology: 10/02/1919. Krasnodar, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Johns A. &amp;ldquo;Cohesion in written business discourse: Some contrasts‟. In &amp;laquo;The ESP Journal&amp;raquo;, 1980. 1(1). Pp. 35-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Johns A. &amp;ldquo;The Language of Business&amp;rdquo;. In &amp;laquo;Annual Review of Applied Linguistics&amp;raquo;, 1986. 7. Pp. 3-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Karasik V.I. &amp;ldquo;About types of discourse&amp;rdquo;. In Linguistic personality: institutional and personal discourse. Collected scientific works / Volgograd State Pedagogic University. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000. Pp. 5-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Nazarova T.B. The vocabulary of the English language of business communication. Special course / T.B. Nazarova, N. Kuznetsova, I.A. Presnukhina. Moscow: Astrel: AST, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Saussure&amp;nbsp; F. de. 1916/1977. Cours de linguistique g&amp;eacute;n&amp;eacute;rale, ed. C.BALLY and A.SECHEHAYE, Lausanne and Paris: Payot; trans. W.BASKIN, Course in General Linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Scoble&amp;nbsp; R., Israel, Sh. Naked Conversations. How blogs are changing the way businesses talk with customers. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>ShiryaevaT.A. Cognitive model of business discourse. Pyatigorsk: Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Tomashevskaya&amp;nbsp; K.V. The economic discourse of the contemporary in its lexical representation. Dissertation of Doctor of Philology: 10.02.01. St. Petersburg., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Vandijk T. A. (Ed.) Discourse Studies. 5 vols. Sage Benchmarks in Discourse Studies. (pp. xix-xiii). London: Sage, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Wodak R. and P. Chilton (Eds.) New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Sources of the textual materials</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>http://www.coca-colaconversations.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>http://googleblog.blogspot.com&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>http://www.exxonmobil.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>http://www.futurebanking.bankofamerica.com/</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>