<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2016-2-4-23-28</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">902</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>PEDAGOGICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>RESEARCH RESULTS: THE STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RESEARCH RESULTS: THE STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Polonskiy</surname><given-names>Valentin Mikhaylovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Polonskiy</surname><given-names>Valentin Mikhaylovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>polon7@yandex.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2016/4/Полонский_ВМ.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The result of scientific and pedagogical research is fixed in the individual consciousness as a certain knowledge, or exists objectively in extra subject formalized types of knowledge, such as concept, methodology, theory, conditions, etc. Pedagogical research as a result contains extra subject knowledge, consciously objectified by the developer for subsequent use by other people.
The object-component method for describing the result of scientific and pedagogical research in the form of three interrelated components has been developed. The object component describes the product of research subject-categorically, it shows the kind of results obtained in the end of the study. Translating component shows, what in fact was performed with the object part. A specifically-pedagogical component complements and specifies the result of the scientific and pedagogical research. All components complement each other, describing different sides of the result of the research as a whole. 
The scientific result has two sides: a substantive (ontological) side and an internally related to its value (axiological) side. The criterion of novelty characterizes the substantive side of the result of the scientific and pedagogical research. The criterion of theoretical and practical significance characterizes the value side. The presentation of the result of the study in the form of three interlinked components makes it possible to analyze and describe the scientific result from unified methodological positions.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The result of scientific and pedagogical research is fixed in the individual consciousness as a certain knowledge, or exists objectively in extra subject formalized types of knowledge, such as concept, methodology, theory, conditions, etc. Pedagogical research as a result contains extra subject knowledge, consciously objectified by the developer for subsequent use by other people.
The object-component method for describing the result of scientific and pedagogical research in the form of three interrelated components has been developed. The object component describes the product of research subject-categorically, it shows the kind of results obtained in the end of the study. Translating component shows, what in fact was performed with the object part. A specifically-pedagogical component complements and specifies the result of the scientific and pedagogical research. All components complement each other, describing different sides of the result of the research as a whole. 
The scientific result has two sides: a substantive (ontological) side and an internally related to its value (axiological) side. The criterion of novelty characterizes the substantive side of the result of the scientific and pedagogical research. The criterion of theoretical and practical significance characterizes the value side. The presentation of the result of the study in the form of three interlinked components makes it possible to analyze and describe the scientific result from unified methodological positions.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Scientific result</kwd><kwd>result components</kwd><kwd>result structure</kwd><kwd>object-component method for describing the results of the study</kwd><kwd>theoretical and practical significance</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Scientific result</kwd><kwd>result components</kwd><kwd>result structure</kwd><kwd>object-component method for describing the results of the study</kwd><kwd>theoretical and practical significance</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Altukhova M.A. Terms and conditions as a result of scientific and pedagogical research. Theoretical studies in 2006. / Ed. V.A. Myasnikova. M.: ITIP, 2007. Pp. 34-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Altukhova M.A. Description of the novelty of the results of educational research from the perspective of the object-component method: Author. cand. ped. Sciences. M., 2007. 24 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Klyuchevskiy V.O. The course of the Russian history. Part 1. M .: Mysl&amp;#39;. 1987. P. 55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy of the Russian Federation: Federal Law. Adopted by the State Duma on July 12, 1996 Approved by the Federation Council on August 7, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Polonskiy V.M. The structure of the results of the scientific and pedagogical research // Pedagogy № 7.1998.Pp. 26-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Polonskiy V.M. Criteria and methods for evaluating the quality of the scientific and pedagogical research. Author. diss. for the degree of Doctor. ped. Sciences. M: 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Polonskiy V.M. The object-component method of describing the scientific and pedagogical research. P.72-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Bagozzi R.P. A prospectus for theory construction in marketing //The Journal of Marketing. 1984. С. 11-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Greenwald A.G. et al. Under what conditions does theory obstruct research&amp;nbsp; progress? // Psychological review. 1986. Т. 93. №. 2. С. 216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>MacKenzie S.B. The dangers of poor construct conceptualization&amp;nbsp; // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2003. Т. 31. №. 3. С. 323-326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Podsakoff P.M., Organ D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects&amp;nbsp; // Journal of management. 1986. Т. 12. №. 4. Pp. 531-544.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Spector P. E. Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Sage, 1992. №. 82.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>