<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8971</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8971</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8971-2026-12-1-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4068</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>ПЕДАГОГИКА</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Зарубежный опыт исследования взаимодействия обучающихся с генеративным искусственным интеллектом: подходы и методы&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Foreign experience in studying the interaction of students with generative artificial intelligence: approaches and methods&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гнедых</surname><given-names>Дарья Сергеевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gnedykh</surname><given-names>Daria Sergeevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>d.gnedyh@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/pedagogy/2026/1/Гнедых.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Введение. Становится неизбежным внедрение генеративного искусственного интеллекта (ГИИ) во все сферы жизнедеятельности человека, в том числе и в сферу образования. В связи с этим актуальным является изучение процесса взаимодействия индивида с ГИИ для разработки наиболее эффективных стратегий такого сотрудничества. Таким образом, в настоящий момент одной из первостепенных задач выступает определение методологии и методов изучения процесса взаимодействия с ГИИ. Цель исследования &amp;ndash; анализ зарубежных научных статей, направленный на выявление методов изучения взаимодействия обучающихся с генеративным искусственным интеллектом. Методология&amp;nbsp;и методы. Для достижения цели исследования были проведены библиометрический анализ, а также аналитический обзор зарубежных статей, посвященных изучению взаимодействия обучающихся с ГИИ. Результаты. Установлено, что изучение взаимодействия обучающихся с ГИИ происходит через анализ как количественных, так и качественных данных, собранных в ходе эмпирических, экспериментальных и квазиэкспериментальных исследований. Было выделено четыре группы параметров и критериев оценки такого взаимодействия: технические, психологические, социальные и академические. Предметом анализа в текстах диалогов обучающихся с ГИИ выступают такие параметры, как характеристики промптов (сложность, структура, тип), стратегии промпт-инжиниринга, контекст взаимодействия, а также релевантность ответов ГИИ запросам обучающегося. Заключение. Полученные результаты могут быть полезны специалистам в сфере образования для организации исследований взаимодействия обучающихся с ГИИ. Изучение характеристик и особенностей такого взаимодействия может помочь в разработке стратегий психолого-педагогического сопровождения, направленных на снижение его нежелательного влияния не только на процесс и результат обучения, но и на личность обучающихся.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into all spheres of human activity, including education, is becoming inevitable. In this regard, it is relevant to study the process of individual interaction with GenAI in order to develop the most effective strategies for such cooperation. Thus, at the moment, one of the priority tasks is to determine the methodology and methods for studying the process of human-GenAI interaction. The purpose of the study is to analyze foreign scientific articles aimed at identifying methods for studying the interaction of students with generative artificial intelligence. Materials and methods. To achieve the purpose of the study, bibliometric analysis was carried out, as well as an analytical review of foreign articles dedicated to the study of students-GenAI interaction. Results. It was revealed that the investigation of students-GenAI interaction is organized through the analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data collected during empirical, experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Four groups of parameters and criteria for evaluating such interaction were identified: technical, psychological, social, and academic. The subject of analysis in the texts of dialogues between students and GenAI are such parameters as the characteristics of prompts (complexity, structure, type), prompt-engineering strategies, the context of interaction, as well as the relevance of GenAI responses to student requests. Conclusion. The results can be useful to specialists in the field of education for organizing research on the interaction of students with GenAI. Studying the characteristics and features of such interaction can help in developing strategies for psychological and pedagogical support aimed at reducing its undesirable impact not only on the learning process and academic outcomes, but also on students&amp;rsquo; personality.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>генеративный искусственный интеллект</kwd><kwd>взаимодействие с генеративным искусственным интеллектом</kwd><kwd>обучающиеся</kwd><kwd>методы оценки взаимодействия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>generative artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>interaction with generative artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>students</kwd><kwd>methods of interaction assessment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Носуленко В.Н. Вопросы интеграции качественных и количественных методов в психологическом исследовании // Экспериментальная психология. 2021. Т. 14. № 3. C. 4-16. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2021140301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Потенциал искусственного интеллекта в контексте педагогики совместной деятельности / Иванова А.С., Савченко У.А., Фещенко А.В., Чечихина А.Н. // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2025. № 514.&amp;nbsp;С. 151-158. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/514/17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Развитие субъектности студентов при взаимодействии с генеративным искусственным интеллектом: систематизация научных представлений / Гнедых Д.С., Бордовская Н.В., Кошкина Е.А., Посохова С.Т., Хромова М.А., Исхакова М.П. // Образование и наука. 2025.&amp;nbsp;№ 27(8). С. 9-34. DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2025-8-9-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Резцов, С. М. Сравнительный анализ языковых моделей в обработке неструктурированных данных на примере Deepseek и GigaChat // Парадигма. 2025. №5. Ч 2. С. 200-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>AI in the classroom: GPT usage and learner typologies in programming / Wang D., Dong X., Fang Z., Wang L.Y.K., Jin Z. // Education Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15(10). P. 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101353.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Alafnan M.A., Dishari S., MohdZuki S.F. Developing soft skills in the artificial intelligence era: communication, business writing, and composition skills // Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology. 2024. Vol. 4(4). P. 305-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2024.0496.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Artificial intelligence in education: enhancing student engagement and academic success / Farhat T., Ali M., Batool M., Nagal C.J.C., Ahmad R. // Research Journal for Social Affairs. 2025. Vol.&amp;nbsp;03(06). P.&amp;nbsp;419-433. DOI:10.71317/RJSA.003.06.0469.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Belda-Medina J., Koko&amp;scaron;kov&amp;aacute; V. Integrating chatbots in education: insights from the Chatbot-Human Interaction Satisfaction Model (CHISM) // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023. Vol. 20. P. 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00432-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Design language learning with artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on activity theory from a systematic review / Li Y., Zhou X., Yin Hb., Chiu T.K.F. // Smart Learning Environments. 2025. Vol.&amp;nbsp;12. P.&amp;nbsp;1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00379-0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>From prompting to proficiency: a mixed-methods analysis of prompting with ChatGPT versus lecturer interaction in an EFL classroom / Andewi W., Waziana W., Wibisono D., Putra K.A., Hastomo T., Oktarin I. B. // Journal of Studies in the English Language. 2025. Vol. 20(2). P. 210-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64731/jsel.v20i2.282318.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Gabrov&amp;scaron;ek R., Rihtar&amp;scaron;icˇ D. Custom generative artiﬁcial intelligence tutors in action: an experimental evaluation of prompt strategies in STEM education // Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17. P. 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Gelo O., Braakmann D., Benetka G. Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate // Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2008. Vol. 42. P. 266-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Generative AI and the future of education: ragnar&amp;ouml;k or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators / Lim W.M., Gunasekara A., Pallant J.L., Pallant J.I.,&amp;nbsp;Pechenkina E. // The International Journal of Management Education. 2023. Vol. 21(2). P. 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>G&amp;ouml;k&amp;ccedil;earslan S., Tosun C., Erdemir Z.G. Benefits, challenges, and methods of Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots in education: A systematic literature review // International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE). 2024. Vol. 7(1). P. 19-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.600.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Hwang G.J., Chang C.Y. A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education // Interactive Learning Environments. 2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Vol.&amp;nbsp;31(7). P.&amp;nbsp;4099-4112. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Investigating the tripartite interaction among teachers, students, and generative AI in EFL education: A mixed-methods study / L. Guan, Lee J.C.-K., Zhang Y., Gu M.M. // Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2025. Vol. 8.&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Ismail I.A., Abuhamda E. Understanding quantitative and qualitative research methods: A theoretical perspective for young researchers // International Journal of Research. 2021. Vol. 8(2). P. 71-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-201-5-070.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Jony A.I., Hamim S.A. Empowering virtual collaboration: harnessing AI for enhanced teamwork in higher education // Educational Technology Quarterly [Online]. 2024. Vol. 3. P.337-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.746.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Klar M. Using ChatGPT is easy, using it effectively is tough? A mixed methods study on K-12 students&amp;rsquo; perceptions, interaction patterns, and support for learning with generative AI chatbots // Smart Learning Environments. 2025. Vol. 12. P. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00385-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Li Z., Zhu Y. Fostering deep belonging through culturally-responsive AI mentorship agents: an identity-affirming framework for educational support // Journal of Computer Technology and Applied Mathematics. 2025. Vol. 2(6). P. 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6374616d.333334.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Martin-Moncunill D., Martinez D.A. Students&amp;rsquo; trust in AI and their veriﬁcation strategies: a case study at Camilo Jos&amp;eacute; Cela University // Education Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15(10). P. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Munawwarah M., Alqadri Z., Zubair S. Exploring students&amp;#39; perspectives on the integration of AI in chemistry learning processes: opportunities and challenges // Asian Journal of Science Education. 2025. Vol. 7(1). P. 76-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v6i2.43492.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj P. M., Oteir I. Playing with AI to investigate human-computer interaction technology and improving critical thinking skills to pursue 21st century age // Education Research International. 2022. Vol. 1.&amp;nbsp;P. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6468995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Naseer F., Khawaja S. Mitigating conceptual learning gaps in mixed-ability classrooms: a learning analytics-based evaluation of AI-driven adaptive feedback for struggling learners // Applied Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15. P. 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ app15084473.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Okubo Y. Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples. Paris: Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing. 1997. 70 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/208277770603.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Optimization of digital communication strategy in the use of Gemini AI in education (case study and analysis): breaking the limits of virtual interaction in the Metaverse / Solviana M.D., Anisya S., Puspita L., Novitasari A., Elice D. // The International Conference on Da&amp;rsquo;wah &amp;amp; Communication. 2025. P. 436-450. DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i14.19108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Organization of interdisciplinary integration in geography lessons using ChatGPT and digital technologies in shaping students&amp;rsquo; environmental culture / Nurbaeva A., Utebayev N, Mukhanbetkali A., Zakirova S., Bozhbanova M.&amp;nbsp; // International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 2025. Vol. 8(6). P. 990-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.9778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Putra I.K.A., Santosa M.H., Indrayani L. ChatGPT in English language learning: user experience and enjoyment among students and teacher // Journal of Educational Study. 2025.&amp;nbsp;Vol.&amp;nbsp;5(1). P.&amp;nbsp;31-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v5i1.973.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Ramadana M.R., Ulfa S., Soepriyanto Y. Analyzing student cognitive engagement in AI-based learning using prompting techniques // Indonesian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining. 2025. Vol. 8(2). P. 326-336. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ijaidm.v8i2.36160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Saha S. The role of AI-powered chatbots in reducing student anxiety in online learning environments // International Journal for Research in Applied Science &amp;amp; Engineering Technology. 2025. Vol. 13(3). P. 155-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.67066.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Sarwar A., Khan M. The role of AI in shaping passive learning behaviour: A Vygotskian perspective from Pakistani students // Social Sciences &amp;amp; Humanity Research Review. 2025. Vol.&amp;nbsp;3. №&amp;nbsp;4. P.&amp;nbsp; 426-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Shiffman S., Stone A.A., Hufford M.R. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008. Vol. 4. P. 1-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Slijepcevic N., Yaylali A. Leveraging &amp;ldquo;Khanmigo&amp;rdquo; generative AI-powered tool for personalized tutoring to learn scientific concepts // Journal of Teaching and Learning. 2025. Vol. 19.&amp;nbsp;№ 4. P. 155-178. DOI:10.22329/jtl.v19i4.10052.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Song L. Designing AI-empowered personalized learning pathways: construction and empirical study of an adaptive education model based on learning analytics // Journal of Technology Innovation and Engineering. 2025. Vol.1. № 5. P. 1-9. DOI:10.63887/jtie.2025.1.5.10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Thomas D.R. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data // American Journal of Evaluation. 2006. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 237-246. DOI: 10.1177/1098214005283748.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial / Veras M., Dyer J.O., Rooney M., Barros S. P.G., Rutherford D., Kairy D. // JMIR Research Protocols. 2023. Vol. 12. P. 1-11. DOI: 10.2196/51873.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>