Formative professional development of teachers: theoretical foundations and practical implementation
Introduction. In a rapidly changing world, traditional models of professional development that focus on knowledge and skill transfer are no longer effective in fostering flexible competencies and self-development. The study of the potential of formative professional development is a response to these challenges. The purpose of the study was to provide a scientific basis for understanding the essence, content, and practical implementation of formative professional development for educators. Materials and methods. The work used the ideas of a systemic and personality-oriented approach, the principles of acmeology and axiology in relation to the professional development of a teacher. The study was conducted through a structural and comparative analysis of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the process of a teacher's professional development. Results. The framework of the research of the concepts “development”, “formation”, “professional development” included in the concept “forming professional development of a teacher” is determined. It was established that the forming professional development involves a directed change of the teacher’s personality, reflected in the acquisition of a new form of professionalism under the influence of certain factors and conditions of professional activity and opening up new ways for professional self-realization and effective activity. The key characteristics of a teacher's professional development were revealed: the active role of the teacher, constant striving for self-improvement, the presence of feedback, the acceptance of a state of crisis and the development of “deficient” abilities. The ideas of formative assessment in relation to the teacher's formative professional development were substantiated. The main strategies for implementing the teacher's formative professional development (educational, expert-evaluative, managerial, reflexive, motivational, and accompanying) were described. Conclusion. The formative professional development of a teacher is a new tool for improving professional and pedagogical activities. The perspective of studying the formative nature of a teacher's professional development is to consider it as a process of meaningful change in a teacher's personality and a mechanism for integrating the results of critical reflection into value-based attitudes towards professional growth.

















While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Antsyferova, L.I. (2006), Razvitie lichnosti i problemy gerontopsikhologii, [Personality Development and Gerontopsychology Issues], Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Bendler, R. and Grinder, D. (2022), Refreyming: neyrolingvisticheskoe programmirovanie i transformatsiya smyslov, [Reframing: Neuro-linguistic Programming and the Transformation of Meanings], Psi, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Vorobieva, S.V. (2025), Sovremennye sredstva otsenivaniya rezultatov obucheniya v obshheobrazovatelnoy shkole, [Modern means of evaluating learning outcomes in secondary schools], Urite, Moscow, Russia.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1982), Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii, [Questions of theory and history of psychology], Pedagogy, Moscow, Russia.
Gerczberg, F. (2007), Motivatsiya k rabote, [Motivation to work], Top, Moscow, Russia.
Gonobolin, F.N. (1965), Kniga ob uchitele, [A book about a teacher], Education, Moscow, Russia.
Derkach, A. A. (2013), “Psychological and Acmeological Foundations and Means of Optimizing the Personal and Professional Development of a Competitive Specialist”, Acmeology, 1, 11-16. (In Russian).
Gruzdev, P.N. (1949), Voprosy vospitaniya i obucheniya [Issues of education and training], APN OF THE RSFSR, Moscow, Russia.
Efremova, T.F. (2000), Novy slovar russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatelny, [New Dictionary of the Russian Language. Explanatory and Word-Formation Dictionary], Russian language, Moscow, Russia.
Zeer, E.F. (2006), Psikhologiya professionalnogo razvitiya, [Psychology of professional development], Akademiya, Moscow, Russia.
Isaev, I.F. (1993), “Theory and Practice of Forming the Professional and Pedagogical Culture of a Higher School Teacher”, Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow, Russia.
Krutetszky, V.A. (1980), Psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya uchashhikhsya pedagogicheskikh uchilishh, [Psychology: A Textbook for Teachers' College Students], Education, Moscow, Russia.
Krylova, O.N. (2023), Tekhnologiya formiruyushhego otsenivaniya v sovremennoy shkole, [Technology of formative assessment in modern schools], KARO, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Kuzmina, N.V. (1961), Formirovanie pedagogicheskikh sposobnostey, [Formation of pedagogical abilities], Leningrad State Institute, Leningrad, Russia.
Mitina, L.M. (2024), Psikhologiya truda uchitelya, [The psychology of teacher’s work], Urite, Moscow, Russia.
Mitina, L.M. (2018), Lichnostno-professionalnoe razvitie uchitelya: strategii, resursy, riski, [Personal and Professional Development of Teachers: Strategies, Results, and Risks], Nestor-The Story, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Moshnina, R.Sh., Khilenko, T.P. and Batyreva, S.G. (2020), Professionalnoe razvitie pedagogov na osnove kompetentnostnogo podkhoda, [Professional development of teachers based on a competence-based approach], Planet, Moscow, Russia.
Neumoeva-Kolchedanceva, E.V. (2020), “Accompanying the personal self-determination of future teachers as a facilitating practice”, World of Science, Culture, and Education, 4(83), 248-251. DOI: 10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00748. (In Russian).
Petrovsky, V.A. (1984), K postroeniyu modeli razvitiya lichnosti v perekhodnom vozraste. Problemy motivatsii obshhestvenno poleznoy deyatelnosti shkolnikov, [Towards building a model of personality development during adolescence. Problems of motivating students' socially useful activities], APN SSSR, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Povarenkov, Yu.P., (2002), Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie professionalnogo stanovleniya cheloveka, [The psychological content of a person's professional development], URAO, Moscow, Russia.
Prokhorov, A.M., (2000), Bolshoy entsiklopedichesky slovar, [The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary], Norint, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Rukavishnikova, E.E. (2023), Professionalnoe stanovlenie i razvitie pedagoga, [Professional formation and development of a teacher], ARGUS, Stavropol, Russia.
Slastenin, V.A., Isaev, I.F., Mishhenko, A.I. and Shiyanov E.N. (2013), Pedagogika. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vysshikh pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeny [Pedagogy. A textbook for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions], The academy, Moscow, Russia.
Shherbakov, A.I. (1967), Psikhologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya lichnosti sovetskogo uchitelya v sisteme vysshego pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, [Psychological Foundations of the Formation of a Soviet Teacher's Personality in the System], Enlightenment, Leningrad, Russia.
Aguilar, E. and Cohen, L. (2022), 7 Habits That Transform Professional Development, Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, USA.
Beck, D and Cowan, C. (2005), Spiral Dynamics: Understanding Values, Leadership, and Change, Wiley-Blackwell, USA.
Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2009), “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment”, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, November, 1-41. (In UK).
Clare W. Graves. (2005), The Never Ending Quest, ECLET, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Dweck, C.S. (2013), Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, Moscow, Russia.
Fletcher, S.J. and Mullen, C.A. (2012), Mentoring and Coaching in Education. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, UK.
Garraway, J. (2011), “Professional development through formative evaluation”, International Journal for Academic Development, 16 (2), 97-107. (In UK).
Holland, Y. L. (1968), “Explorations of a theory оf vocational choice. VI. A longitudinal study using a sample of typical college students”, Journal of applied psychology, 52 (1), 1-37. DOI: 10.1037/h0025350. (In USA).
Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A. (2005), The Kolb Learning Style Inventory – Version 3.1 2005: Technical Specifications, Hay Group, Boston, USA.
Mezirow, J. (1991), Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA.
Safir, S. and Dugan, J.A. (2021), Next-Generation Model for Equity, Pedagogy, and School Transformation, Thousand Oaks, Corwin, California, USA.
Super, D.E. (1957), Vocational Development: A Framework of Research, Teachers College Press, New York, USA.
Super, D.E. and Bohn, M.Y. (1971), Occupational psychology, Tavistock Publications, London, UK.
Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M. (1990), “Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. (In USA).