Development of communicative interaction of junior schoolchildren in music lessons
Introduction. Communicative interaction in the educational sphere of primary school is the most important component of the personal development of each child. Active participation in communicative interaction is crucial for the development of a person’s personality, social competence and cognitive abilities. For children of primary school age, it can be a key factor in subsequent social integration. One of the areas of development of communicative interaction in primary school age is the use of music. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to analyze and summarize scientific information to identify the features of the development of communicative interaction of primary school students in music lessons, as well as to describe the practical implementation of this process, built on the recognition and use of intonation and semantic elements of musical language in all types of musical activities. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study was the conceptual provisions of general and musical pedagogy and psychology – systemic, subject-activity, individual-creative approaches, the theory of musical and intonation perception, ideas and principles of psycholinguistics (theory of semantic perception of speech). To achieve the goal, the following general scientific theoretical methods were used: analysis of scientific sources on the research problem, generalization, synthesis, systematization, as well as empirical methods, including observation and conversation. Research results. The article describes the multi-level nature of human communicative behavior, analyzes the specifics of prosodic elements of speech and music responsible for the transmission and understanding of meaning, presents the rationale for the “mechanism” of developing communicative interaction of primary school students in music lessons based on the use of musical and intonation models, and practically illustrates the principles of working with musical and intonation models in different types of musical and creative activities of primary school students. Conclusion. The functional interpretation of the presented complex of musical and intonation models can serve as a guide for further methodological and practical improvement of communication processes in the musical and educational sphere at all levels.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Bubnova, G.I. (2021), “Perceptual-auditory segmentation of orally generated speech”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Linguistics and intercultural communication, 19(3), 51-64 (In Russian).
Volchegorskaya, E.Yu. and Nogina, O.A. (2013), “Theoretical and methodological aspects of musical and intonational development of young children”, Nachalnaya shkola plyus Do i Posle, 8, 82-87. (In Russian).
Kazakovskaya, V.V. (2004), “Question-answer unities in the dialogue “adult – child”, Questions of linguistics, 2, 89-110. (In Russian).
Kirnarskaya, D.K. (2004), Psikhologiya spetsialnukh sposobnostey. Muzykalnye sposobnosti [Psychology of special abilities. Musical abilities], Talanty XX1 vek, Moscow, Russia.
Luriya, A.R. (2020), Yazyk i soznanie [Language and consciousness], Progress kniga, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Maksimova, N.V. (2005), “Alien speech” as a communicative strategy», Izdatelsky tsentr Rossiyskiy gosudarstvenny gumanitarny universitet, Moscow, Russia.
Medushevskiy, V.V. (1993), Intonatsionnaya forma muzyki [Intonational form of music], Composer, Moscow, Russia.
Orlov, G.A. (2015), Drevo muzyki [Tree of Music], Composer, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Popova, M.V. (2021), “Comparative analysis of the concepts of “prosody”, “intonation” and related special terms in linguistics”, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 11 (853), 150-159. (In Russian).
Maksimova, V.I. and Golubeva, A.V. (2010), Russian language and culture of speech: textbook, Zlatoust, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Sinyov, A.D. (2010), “Prosody as a supersegmental phonological phenomenon in the context of modern linguistic research”, Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 17, 104-113. (In Russian).
Teplov, B.M. (2024), Psikhologiya muzykalnykh sposobnostey: uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of musical abilities: a textbook], Lan, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Toropova, V.A. (2010), Muzykalnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhologiya muzykalnogo obrazovaniya [Musical Psychology and Psychology of Music Education: a textbook], Uchebno-metodicheskiy izdatelskiy tsentr “GRAF-PRESS”, Moscow, Russia.
Trusova, T.S. (2020), “On the distinction between the concepts of “prosody” and “intonation” in modern linguistics”, EUROPEAN RESEARCH, [European research], Penza, Russia.
Shevtsova, E.E. (2024), Tekhnologii formirovaniya intonatsionnoy storony rechi: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Technologies for the formation of the intonation aspect of speech: a teaching aid for universities], Izdatelstvo Yurait, Moscow, Russia.
Yakubinskiy, L.P. (1986), Yazyk i ego funktsionirovanie: Izbrannye raboty [Language and its Functioning: Selected Works], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
Brandt, A., Gebrian, M. and Slevc, LR. (2012), “Music and early language acquisition”, Frontiers in Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Corriveau, K., Pasquini, E. and Goswami, U. (2007), “Basic auditory processing skills and specific language impairment: a new look at an old hypothesis”, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(3), 647-666. (In USA).
Fitch, W.T. (2006), “The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective”, Cognition, 100(1), 173-215. (In Nederland).
Fox, A. (2000), “Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals”, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Hale, С. and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005), “Social communication in children with autism”, Autism: the international journal of research and practice, 9, 311-328. (In USA).
Hauser, M.D. and McDermott, J. (2003), “The evolution of the music faculty: a comparative perspective”, Nature Neuroscience, 6 (7), 663-668. (In UK).
Hellbernd, N. 2016, “Prosody conveys speaker’s intentions: Acoustic cues for speech act perception”, Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70-86. (In USA).
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. and Halle. M. (1967), “Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates”, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, 13, 472-481. (In USA).
Koelsch, S. (2014), “Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions”, Nat Rev Neurosci, 15(3), 170-180. (In UK).
Koelsch, S. (2011), “Toward a neural basis of music perception–a review and updated model)”, Frontiers in Psychology, 2(110), 1-20. (In USA).
Parsons, L., Cordier, R., Munro, N. and Joosten, A. (2019), “The feasibility and appropriateness of a peer-to-peer, play-based intervention for improving pragmatic language in children with autism spectrum disorder”, Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 21(4), August, 412-424. (In Australia).
Turing, A.M. (1950), “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, 59, (23659), 433-460. (In UK).
Vaissière, J. (2005), Perception of Intonation, Pisoni, D.B.; Remez, R.E. (ed.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.