Continuity of the Educational Environment in the School-University Interaction System: An Organizational Aspect
Introduction. The issue of the points of contact between schools and pedagogical universities, viewed through the commonality of their values and the diversity of their views on the forms of cooperation, highlights the problem of the continuity of the educational environment in multi-level educational institutions. Practice shows that the declared connection between general and higher pedagogical education is not always supported by a systematic organization of educational interaction, which leads to a mismatch in the environmental influences on the student's personality. The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical basis for the technology of organizing the continuity of the educational environment in the school-university interaction system, which includes a set of principles and stages that ensure the integrity of the educational process as students move from one educational stage to another. Materials and methods. The study used an analysis of legal and regulatory documents, a theoretical analysis and synthesis of psychological and pedagogical literature, a comparative analysis, and a generalization of the authors' practical experience in the field of education. Theoretical modeling allowed for the development of a technology for organizing the continuity of the educational environment in the “school-pedagogical university” system. The study was based on the axiological, systemic-activity, holistic, and environmental approaches. Results. The leading concepts of “continuity” (as the preservation and development of educational traditions during the transition from one educational stage to another) and “educational environment” (as a set of conditions that ensure the value-based and meaningful development of subjects) were analyzed. The principles of organizing a continuous educational environment were substantiated: value-based and meaningful unity, eventfulness, openness, and nature-based approach. The article describes the stages that ensure effective interaction between schools and pedagogical universities: organizational and regulatory (contractual framework, local acts), content and methodological (joint design of educational practices and extracurricular activities), and environmental (organization of spatial and temporal conditions and navigation of educational events). Conclusion. The obtained results create theoretical grounds for designing a unified educational environment in the “school-pedagogical university” system, aimed at developing value-based guidelines and spiritual and moral enrichment of all subjects of educational relations.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Asmolov, A.G. (2008), “Historical-evolutionary paradigm of constructing the diversity of worlds: activity as existence”, Voprosy Psikhologii, 5, 3-11. (In Russian).
Bogdanova, R.U. (2019), “Training of student counselors for creating an educational environment in educational organizations”, Bulletin of Pedagogical Innovations, 1, 52-58. (In Russian).
Godnik, S.M. and Dudetskaya, G.V. (2006), “Lessons in upbringing in the context of continuity between secondary and higher school: from the experience of cooperation between school and university”, Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education, 2, 63-69. (In Russian).
Disterweg, A. (1956), Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Selected Pedagogical Works], Moscow, Russia.
Drobnitsky, O.G. (2002), Moralnaya filosofiya: izbrannye trudy [Moral Philosophy: Selected Works], Gardariki, Moscow, Russia.
Comenius, J.A., Locke, D., Rousseau, J.J. and Pestalozzi, I.G. (1987), Pedagogicheskoe nasledie [Pedagogical Heritage], Moscow, Russia.
Kustov, Yu.A. (1990), Preemstvennost professionalno-tekhnicheskoy i vysshey shkoly [Continuity of Vocational and Higher Education], Sverdlovsk, Russia.
Kyveryalg, A.A. (1971), Voprosy metodiki pedagogicheskih issledovaniy [Voprosy metodiki pedagogicheskih issledovanij], Tallin, Russia.
Makarova, I.A., Novikova, E.S., Petruchenya, N.V. and Sakharcuk, E.I. (2024), “Designing a Model of Continuity of the Educational Environment in the System of Interaction between a General Education School and a Pedagogical University”, Izvestiya of Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 1 (184), 45-56. (In Russian).
Manuilov, Yu.S. (2002), Sredovoy podkhod v vospitanii [Environmental approach in education], Volga-Vyatka Academy of Public Administration, Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Popova, I.N. (2006), “Purposeful formation of school culture as a pedagogical problem”, Education is successful if it is systematic, Vladimir-Moscow, 172-174. (In Russian).
Sergeev, N.K. (2019), Nepreryvnoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v sovremennyh usloviyah: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika [Continuous pedagogical education in modern conditions: methodology, theory, practice], Scientific Publishing House VGSPU “Peremena”, Volgograd, Russia.
Ushinsky, K.D. (1974), Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya. Opyt pedagogicheskoy antropologii i izbr. ped. soch. [Man as an Object of Education. Experience of Pedagogical Anthropology and Selected Pedagogical Works], Moscow, Russia.
Khuseynova, Z.A. (2016), “Educational environment according to L.S. Vygotsky”, Young Scientist, 27.1 (131.1), 31-33. (In Russian).
Shchurkova, N.E. (2019), Pedagogicheskie tekhnologii [Pedagogical Technologies], Yurait, Moscow, Russia.
Amal Musa Alrashidi and Ahmad Mohammad Okleh Alzboon (2025), “School Activities and the Development of Social Values among Saudi High School Students”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24, 11, 637-658. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.24.11.30. (In Saudi Arabia).
Babić, N. (2017), “Continuity and discontinuity in education: example of transition from preschool to school”, Early Child Development and Care, 187(10), 1596-1609. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2017.1301935. (In USA).
Bronkhorst, L.H. and Akkerman, S.F. (2016), “At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts”, Educational Research Review, 19, 18-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001. (In Netherlands).
Gorlova, N.A. (2020), “On the concept of continuity of pedagogical and general education”, The world of University Science: Culture, Education, (8), 56-63. DOI: 10.18522/2658-6983-2020-08-56-63. (In Russian).
Green, C.A. and Eady, M.J. (2024), Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships: Building Connections Across Diverse Educational Systems. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9. (In Singapore).
Lau Y. et al. (2019), “Volunteer motivation, social problem solving, self-efficacy, and mental health: a structural equation model approach”, Educational Psychology, 39, 1, 112-132. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1514102. (In Singapore).
Ling, Chen, Degang, Li and Yong, Li (2023), “Does Volunteer Service Foster Education for A Sustainable Future? – Empirical Evidence from Chinese University Students”, Sustainability, 15(14), 11259. DOI: 10.3390/su151411259. (In China).
Smith, E.P. and Bradshaw, C.P. (2017), “Promoting Nurturing Environments in Afterschool Settings”, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20(2), 117-126. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-017-0239-0. (In USA).
Subban, P., Woodcock, S., Bradford, B., Romano, A., Kullmann, C., Sharma, U., Loreman, T. and Avramidis, E. (2024), “What does the village need to raise a child with additional needs? Thoughts on creating a framework to support collective inclusion”, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 668-683. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2024.2338398. (In Australia).
Zubova, E. and Nechaev, M. (2019) “Scientific-pedagogical research, devoted to the questions of theoretical justification, creation and development of the educating environment”, Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies, 1 (686), 105-114. DOI: 10.32906/AJES/686/2019.01.40. (In Azerbaijan).