Transformation of school rituals in the digital environment of an educational organisation
Introduction. Today, education, including educational practices, is moving toward a digital format. Digital transformation affects all areas of educational activity, and digital resources, neural networks, and instant messengers are part of everyday life. Traditional school systems are also gradually transitioning to digital formats. Rituals have always been an integral part of school life. Today, school rituals are losing or changing some of their characteristics, which affects their educational function. The purpose of this study is to determine the directions and results of the transformation of school rituals, their place and characteristics in the digital environment of modern schools. Materials and Methods. The empirical base consisted of educational organizations in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (8 regions). The survey covered 875 teaching staff and used a specially designed questionnaire. The results of data processing revealed a gap between the assessment of the capabilities and significance of ritual in the traditional school environment. Despite the seemingly successful transition to digital education, there is a problem with quality indicators. Teachers only understand the translation of rituals into digital formats through photo reports of digital resources. This means that the meaning of rituals and students' subjective engagement are lost, indicating that the educational potential of digital formats is not being utilised to its fullest extent. Conclusion. Maintaining and realizing the educational function and potential of ritual in a digital school requires not so much technical solutions as a rethinking of its formats and the roles of participants. A key condition is the transition from information-based formats to active ones that involve collaborative activities.

















While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Barannikov, K.A., Ananin, D.P. Strikun, N.G., Alkanova O.N. and Bayzarov A.Ye. (2023), “Hybrid learning: Russian and foreign experience”, Educational Studies Moscow, (2), 33-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2023-2-33-69. (In Russian).
Vachkova, S.N. (2013), “The impact of global information environment on the educational space and the school way of life”, Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, (4), 114-122. DOI: 10.51314/2073-2635-2013-4-123-125. (In Russian).
Dvoretskaya, I.V. and Uvarov, A.Yu. (2025), “Are schools ready for digital transformation: on the results of monitoring general education organizations”, Educational Studies Moscow, (1), 140-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2025-19763. (In Russian).
Ignatova, V.V. and Kozlova, L.A. (2004), Obnovlenie uklada shkolnoy zhizni: monografiya [Updating the way of school life: a monograph], Sib. gos. tehnol. un-t, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Kazakova, E.I. (2020), “Digital transformation of teacher education”, Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 1(112), 8-14. DOI: 10.20323/1813-145X-2020-1-112-8-14. (In Russian).
Kalybekova, A.A., Ashen, B.M. and Mamaeva, Zh.N. (2019), “Formation of value orientations of youth on the ideas of folk pedagogy of Kazakhs”, Qazaqtaný, 1(1), 109-113. (In Russian).
Kornetov, G.B. (2022), “The way of school life and the school spirit in the domestic pedagogical tradition”, Innovative projects and programs in education 3(81), 4-10. (In Russian).
Korsakova, T.V. (2011), “Pedagogical provision of spiritual and moral way of school life”, Man and education, 3(28), 23-27. (In Russian).
Korsakova, T.V. (2010), “The concept of 'the way of school life': pedagogical potential for solving the problems of updating the structure and content of education”, The world of academia: Culture, Education, (5), 39-45. (In Russian).
Korsakova, T.V. (2011), “The way of school life: stages and logic of development in domestic education”, The world of academia: Culture, Education, (3), 49-54. (In Russian).
Korsakova, T.V. (2011), Uklad shkol'noy zhizni: monografiya [The way of school life: a monograph], Izd-vo Rostovskogo obl. IPK i PRO, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Kupriyanov, B.V. (2015), “The ways of school life”, Public Education, 8(1451), 147-154, available at: narodnoe.org (Accessed 18 June 2026). (In Russian).
Nyudyurmagomedova, L.A. and Nyudyurmagomedov, A.N. (2015), “Integration of traditional and interactive rituals in ethnocultural education of adolescents”, International Research Journal, 11-4(42), 91-93. DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2015.42.057. (In Russian).
Savelieva, O.E. (2024), “The use of rituals in the pedagogical process for the formation of conflict-free communication skills in schoolchildren”, Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 3(44), 206-211. DOI: 10.36809/2309-9380-2024-44-206-211. (In Russian).
Selivanova, N.L. (2025), “Features of raising children in the era of digital environment: pedagogical risks and opportunities”, Siberian Pedagogical Journal, (4), 19-31. DOI: 10.15293/1813-4718.2504.02. (In Russian).
Soldatova, G.U. (2017), “Digital generation, or the main humanitarian challenge to adults in the XXI century”, Akademicheskiy vestnik Akademii sotsial'nogo upravleniya, 3(25), 3-6. (In Russian).
Soldatova, G.U. and Rasskazova, E.I. (2023), “Digital socialization of Russian adolescents: through the prism of comparison with adolescents from 18 European countries”, Social Psychology and Society, 14(3), 11-30. DOI: doi.org. (In Russian).
Sukhomlinskiy, V.A. (1979), Pavlyshskaya srednyaya shkola: Obobshchenie opyta uchebno-vospitatel'noj raboty v sel'skoj srednej shkole [Pavlysh secondary school: Summarizing the experience of educational work in a rural secondary school], 2nd ed., Prosveshchenie, Moscow, USSR.
Tubelskiy, A.N. (2007), “The way of school life – the hidden content of education”, Educational Studies (Moscow), (4), 177-181. (In Russian).
Khrenova, T.P. (2012), Stanovlenie i tendentsii razvitiya uklada zhizni otechestvennoy shkoly (20-90-ye gody KhKh veka, pervoe desyatiletie KhKhI veka) [Formation and development trends of the way of life of the domestic school (20-90s of the XX century, the first decade of the XXI century)], GU DPO “Institut razvitiya obrazovaniya Zabaykal'skogo kraya”, Chita, Russia.
Ball, S.J. (2000), “Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society?”, The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1-23. (In Australian).
Douglas, M. (2002), Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo, Routledge, New York, USA.
Lenoir, R. and Durkheim, E. (2007), “L’enseignement de la morale: The Lenoir-Durkheim Lecture Notes”, Durkheimian Studies, 13(1), 8-58. 10.1515/commun-2014-0113. URL: https: // www.researchgate.net/publication/278156184. (In UK).
Livingstone, S. (2014), “Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites”, Communications, 39, 283-303. DOI: 10.1515/commun-2014-0113, available at: researchgate.net (Accessed 08 July 2026). (In USA).
Quantz, R.A. (1999), “School ritual as performance: a reconstruction of Durkheim's and Turner's uses of ritual”, Educational Theory, 49, 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1999.00493.x. (In USA).
Turner, V. (1969), The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, USA.
Zhao, Y. (2020), “COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change”, Prospects (Paris), 49(1-2), 29-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11125-020-09477-y. (In France).
The article was prepared as part of the implementation of the state assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation for the provision of public services (performance of work) on the topic “The Impact of the Digital Structure of the Modern School on the Transformation of Educational Practices in the Context of Digitalization of Education” No. QZOY-2026-0009.