Development of pedagogical abilities of schoolchildren of psychological and pedagogical classes in the context
of digitalization of education: methodological approaches and theoretical foundations
Introduction. The early identification of pedagogical talent and the development of pedagogical skills in specialised classes are now considered an important factor in the intensification of the Russian system of pedagogical education. At present this task should be solved taking into account the digitalisation of all spheres of life of the Russian society. At present there are attempts to solve this problem in practice, but methodologically it is still poorly developed, which leads to unsatisfactory results both in terms of insufficient motivation and level of development of pedagogical skills of graduates of specialised classes, and in terms of low percentage of their admission to pedagogical universities. The purpose of the article is to determine the methodological approaches to the development of pedagogical abilities of schoolchildren studying in psychological and pedagogical classes, taking into account modern trends in the digitalization of Russian education. Methods: analysis, synthesis, abstraction, generalization, integration, classification, comparison, which together made it possible to achieve completeness and complexity in the study of the problem. As a result of the study, it was found that in the works of Russian scientists, the criteria for classifying pedagogical abilities were the conditions of the effectiveness of pedagogical activity, sensitivity to various components of pedagogical activity, the valence of the result of action, correlated with the psychophysiological characteristics of mental functions and states. Today, Russian researchers are trying to identify and substantiate new abilities that will allow teachers of the future to carry out the educational process in the high-tech world – this is the ability to metacognition, critical thinking, reflexivity, creativity, psychological flexibility, social and emotional intelligence, self-presentation skills, etc. If earlier morphological and sociological criteria were used in foreign classifications, then at present foreign scientists focus on the study of pedagogical talent and a number of qualities that are not directly related to the performance of pedagogical activity, but are associated with maintaining and stimulating the effectiveness of the process of its implementation and effectiveness. In light of the aforementioned considerations, we have identified a number of methodological approaches that facilitate a qualitative restructuring of specialised education in psychological and pedagogical classes, thereby enabling a transition to a new level of pre-professional training of teachers for the school of the future. These approaches include the systemic, competence-based, cultural, subjective, anthropological, personal-activity-based, and convergent approaches. Conclusion. The socio-cultural development of future teachers in the context of the convergence of the real and digital environment should bring education closer to the needs of the modern generation, the demands of practice, and at the same time contribute to their enriched professional and personal development and the formation of subjects of their own professional self-determination.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Aminov, N.A., Chernyavskaya, V.S. and Osadcheva, I.I. (2020), “The differential context of the study of pedagogical abilities and pedagogical skills”, Mir psixologii, 3(103), 131-143. (In Russian).
Andriadi, I.P. (1997), “The authority of the teacher and the process of his formation”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, Moscow, Russia.
Asmakovets, E.S. (2000), “Psychological factors and conditions for the development of emotional flexibility of a teacher”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.07 Educational psychology, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia.
Belomestnova, N.V. (2005), “A systematic approach in psychology”, Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 10-1(48), 43-54. (In Russian).
Berestovskaya, L.P. (1998), “A personal-activity approach in the formation of pedagogical knowledge”, Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitelnykh organakh, 1(7), 123-125. (In Russian).
Blinova, T.L. (2018), “A convergent approach in teaching”, Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 8, 42-48. (In Russian).
Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B., Bogoyavlenskaya, M.E. (2005), Psikhologiya odarennosti: ponyatie, vidy, problemy [Psychology of giftedness: concept, types, problems], MIOO, Voskresensk (Mosk. obl.), Moscow, Russia.
Burlakova, N.Yu. (2000), “Professional abilities in the structure of the integral individuality of a physical education teacher”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, Perm, Russia.
Vasilieva, E.M. and Khakimzyanova, I.M. (2014), “General pedagogical abilities and their diagnosis”, Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov, 1, 21-26. (In Russian).
Vygotskiy, L.S. (2024), Istoriya razvitiya vysshih psikhicheskih funktsiy [The history of the development of higher mental functions], Yurait, Moscow, Russia.
Vyatkina, L.B. (2004), “Special abilities in the structure of the integral personality of an elementary school teacher”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.01 General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology, Perm State Pedagogical University, Perm, Russia.
Gonobolin, N.F. (1962), “Psikhologicheskiy analiz pedagogicheskikh sposobnostei”, “Sposobnosti i interesy” [Abilities and interests], in Levitova, N.D., Krutetsky, V.A. (ed.), Izdatelstvo Akademii pedagogicheskikh nauk RSFSR, Moscow, Russia.
Gorbatova, M.M. (1996), “The relationship of general and special abilities in pedagogical management activities”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.07 Educational psychology, Irkutsk State Pedagogical Institute, Irkutsk, Russia.
Deev, M.V., Finogeev, A.G. and Grushevskiy A.A. (2022), “Development of the concept of convergent education within the digital educational environment based on the analysis of the requirements of regional labor markets”, Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve, 4, 104-123. (In Russian).
Domanova, E.E. (1999), “Special abilities in the structure of the integral individuality of biology and chemistry teachers”: Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.01 General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology, Perm State Pedagogical University, Perm, Russia.
Zimnyaya, I.A. (2010), “Lichnostno-deyatelnostny podkhod kak osnova organizatsii obrazovatelnogo protsessa”, Pedagogicheskaya psihkologiya [Educational psychology], Psychological and Social Institute, MODEK, Moscow, Voronezh, Russia, 245-252.
Ilaltdinova, E.Yu., Fedorov, A.A. and Frolova, S.V. (2019), Pedagogicheskaya odarennost: aktualnye psikhologo-pedagogicheskie resheniya [Pedagogical giftedness: current psychological and pedagogical solutions]. NGPU im. K. Minina, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia.
Kazakova, E.I., Basyuk, V.S. and Vrublevskaya E.G. (2019), “Problema razvitiya pedagogicheskoy kultury shkolnikov v usloviyakh modernizatsii pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii” [The problem of the development of pedagogical culture of schoolchildren in the context of modernization of pedagogical education in Russia], Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya, 11, 3, 143-154. (In Russian).
Koncepciya profil`ny`kh Psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh klassov (2021). Astapova, E.V., Basyuk, V.S., Baiborodova, L.V., Pazukhina, S.V. and others, “Organizatsiya deyatelnosti Psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh klassov” [Organization of the activities of psychological and pedagogical classes], Akademiya realizatsii gosudarstvennoy politiki i professionalnogo razvitiya rabotnikov obrazovaniya Ministerstva prosveshheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Moscow, Russia.
Kossov, B.B. (1998), Lichnost'i pedagogicheskaya odarennost: novy metod [Personality and pedagogical giftedness: a new method], In-t prakt. psikhologii, MODEK, Voronezh, Moscow, Russia.
Krutetskiy, V.A. and Balbasova, E.G. (1991), Pedagogicheskie sposobnosti, ikh struktura, diagnostika, usloviya formirovaniya i razvitiya [Pedagogical abilities, their structure, diagnostics, conditions of formation and development], Prometej, Moscow, Russia.
Kudryavtsev, V.T. (1998), “The cultural and historical status of childhood: a sketch of a new understanding”, Psychological Journal, 19, 3, 17-33. (In Russian).
Kuzmina, N.V. (1985), Sposobnosti, odarennost, talant uchitelya [Abilities, giftedness, talent of a teacher], Znanie, Leningrad, Russia.
Levitov, N.D. (1964), Detskaya i pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Child and educational psychology], Prosveshhenie, Moscow, Russia.
Leontiev, A.N. (2004), Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity. Conscience. Personality], Smysl, Academia, Moscow, Russia.
Mazilov, V.A. and Kostrigin, A.A. (2012), “Problema pedagogicheskikh sposobnostey v sovremennoy zarubezhnoy psikhologii” [The problem of pedagogical abilities in modern foreign psychology], Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika, 2, 68-85. (In Russian).
Markova, A.K. (1993), Psikhologiya truda uchitelya [Psychology of teacher's work], Prosveshchenie, Moscow, Russia.
Merlin, V.S. (1986), Ocherk integral'ogo issledovaniya individual'osti [An essay on the integral study of individuality], Pedagogika, Moscow, Russia.
Mityaeva, A.M. (2007), “Competence model of multilevel higher education (based on the material of formation of educational and research competence of bachelors and masters)”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, Volgograd, Russia.
Pazukhina, S.V. (2011), “Professional training of future teachers: an anthropological approach”, Akmeologiya, 4(40), 62-73. (In Russian).
Petrenko, V.F. (2005), Osnovy psikhosemantiki [The basics of psychosemantics], Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti [The working concept of giftedness] (1998). Avtorskiy kollektiv, in Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. and Shadrikov, V.D. (ed.). Magistr, Moscow, Russia.
Rean, A.A. (1990), “Reflexive and perceptual analysis of the teacher's activity”, Voprosy` psixologii, 2, 77-81. (In Russian).
Rudenko, G.I. (1996), “Pedagogical giftedness in the structure of integral individuality”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, Perm, Russia.
Savenkov, A.I. (2024), Psikhologiya detskoy odarennosti [Psychology of child giftedness], Yurait, Moscow, Russia.
Serikov, V.V. (1994), Lichnostny podhkod v obrazovanii: kontseptsiya i tekhnologii [A personal approach in education: concept and technologies], Peremena, Volgograd, Russia.
Slobodchikov, V.I. and Isaev, E.I. (1998), “The anthropological principle in developmental psychology”, Voprosy psikhologii, 6, 3-17. (In Russian).
Sposobnosti i sklonnosti: kompleksnye issledovaniya (1989), [Abilities and inclinations: complex studies], in E.A. Golubeva (ed.),
V.V. Pechenkov, E.P. Guseva etc., Pedagogika, Moscow, Russia.
Stakhneva, L.A. (2005), “A subjective approach to the problem of personality development and its significance for pedagogical psychology”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.07 Educational psychology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Strakhova, L.M. (2000), “Formation of emotionality of pedagogical activity of future teachers”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, Saratov, Russia.
Subiketny podkhod v psihkologii: sbornik nauchnyh trudov (2009), [The subjective approach in psychology: a collection of scientific papers] / Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology; in A. L. Zhuravleva (ed.) et al. Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Tatur, Yu.G. (2004), “Competence in the structure of the quality model of specialist training”, Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 3, 20-26. (In Russian).
Teplov, B.M. (2014), “Abilities and giftedness”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 20, Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie, 4, 99-105. (In Russian).
Ushinskiy, K.D. (2004), Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya: opyt pedagogicheskoy antropologii [Man as a subject of education: the experience of pedagogical anthropology], Fair-Press, Moscow, Russia.
Feshhenko, T.S. and Shestakova, L.A. (2017), “A convergent approach in school education – new opportunities for the future”, Mezhdunarodny nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal, 11(65), available at: https://research-journal.org/archive/11-65-2017-november/konvergentnyj-podxod-v-shkolnom-obrazovanii-novye-vozmozhnosti-dlya-budushhego (Accessed 10 July 2024). DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2017.65.127. (In Russian).
Firsova, A.E. (2023), Primenenie antropologicheskogo podkhoda v sovremennoy otechestvennoy pedagogicheskoy teorii i innovatsionnoy obrazovatelnoy praktike [The application of the anthropological approach in modern Russian pedagogical theory and innovative educational practice], Sfera, Volgograd, Russia.
Holodnaya, M.A. (2017), Psikhologiya odarennosti i tvorchestva [Psychology of giftedness and creativity], in L.I. Larionova, A.I. Savenkova (ed.), Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Khrustaleva, T.M. (2012), “Pedagogical giftedness of schoolchildren: theoretical foundations and empirical research”, Vektor nauki TGU, 1(8), 312-315. (In Russian).
Hutorskoy, A.V. and Hutorskaya, L.N. (2003), “Kompetentnostny podkhod k modelirovaniyu poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya”, Teoriya i praktika poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya [Theory and practice of postgraduate education], in A.I. Zhuka (ed.), Grodnenskiy gosudarstvenny universitet, Grodno, Belarus.
Chigintseva, O.N. (2022), “Features of the anthropological approach to adult personality education”, Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 1, 192-202. (In Russian).
Chudnovskiy, V.E. (2006), Stanovlenie lichnosti i problemy smysla zhizni [The formation of personality and the problems of the meaning of life], Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Psikhologo-sotsialnogo instituta, MODE`K, Moscow, Voronezh, Russia.
Shadrikov, V.D. (2004), “A new specialist model: innovative training and a competence-based approach”, Higher education today, 8, 26-31. (In Russian).
Shhukina, M.A. (2015), “Psychology of personality self-development: a subjective approach”, Abstract of Ph.D. Dissertation, 19.00.13 Developmental psychology, acmeology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Abramo, J.M. and Tan, L. (2017), “A Cross-Cultural Interview Study of Singaporean and US General Music Teachers' “Pedagogical Creativity””, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 214, 41-61. DOI: 10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.214.0041. (In UK).
Cascio, J. (2020), “Facing the Age of Chaos”, available at: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d (Accessed 13 July 2024). (In UK).
Edwards, M.N. et al. (2007), “Pedagogical practices: Examining preservice teachers' perceptions of their abilities”, Instructional Science, 35, 5, 443-465. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-006-9014-1 35. (In UK).
Elliott, K. (2015), “Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development?”, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 102-116. DOI: 10.3316/informit.490666162557912. (In UK).
Gardner, Н. (1993), Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Inteligences. Basic Book, New York, USA.
Golombek, P. and Doran, M. (2014), “Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002. (In UK).
Jiang, Y., Ma, L. and Gao, L. (2016), “Assessing teachers' metacognition in teaching: The teacher metacognition inventory”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 403-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.014. (In UK).
Holland, J.L. (1996), “Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions”, American Psychologist, 51, 397-406. (In UK).
Kuntze, S. (2012), “Pedagogical content beliefs: global, content domain-related and situation-specific components”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 2, 273-292. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-011-9347-9. (In UK).
Lachner, A., Jarodzka, H. and Nuckles, M. (2016), “What makes an expert teacher? Investigating teachers' professional vision and discourse abilities”, Instructional Science, 44, 3, 197-203. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-016-9376-y. (In UK).
Larrivee, B. (2008), “Development of a tool to assess teachers' level of reflective practice”, Reflective practice, 9, 3, 341-360. DOI: 10.1080/14623940802207451. (In UK).
Mid, M. (1970), Culture and commitment: a study of the generation gap. Natural History Press, New York, USA.
Renzulli, J.S. (1994), Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, Creative Learning Press, inc., Connecticut, USA.
Trung, P.T., Liu, Q. and Quyen, D. (2016), “Heart and talent of teacher for improving the quality of teaching political theory subjects in universities of Vietnam”, International Journal of Information Research and Review, 3(10), 2872-2875. (In UK).
Var, L. (2018), “The Analysis of Teacher Candidates' Self-Sufficiency about Their Teaching Abilities at Different Departments”, Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4, 3, 246-249. (In UK).
Voss, T., Kunter, M. and Baumert, J. (2011), “Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation”, Journal of educational psychology, 103, 4, 952-969. DOI: 10.1037/a0025125. (In UK).
Windt, A. et al. (2016), “Teaching Abilities of Prospective Teachers at the Beginning of the Practical Phase of Teacher Education”, In J. Lavonen
et al. (Eds.). Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 13. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2188-2195. (In UK).
Zhao, J. et al. (2016), “Chinese EFL teachers' knowledge of basic language constructs and their self-perceived teaching abilities”, Annals of dyslexia, 66, 1, 127-146. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-015-0110-2. (In UK).
This article was written as part of a research project funded by the Russian Ministry of Education (State Assignment No. 073-00033-24-01, dated 9 February 2024) with the aim of developing a scientific and methodological framework for the creation of digital educational content for psychological training in pedagogical classes.